Cerro Largo vs Racing: match statistics
Cerro Largo vs Racing: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cerro Largo played Racing in Primera División (Uruguay). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Cerro Largo: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Racing: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cerro Largo scores 1.08 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Racing scores 1.75 and concedes 0.92. League average: 2.52 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cerro Largo 42%, Racing 67%. Over 2.5: Cerro Largo 42%, Racing 50%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Racing has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.35. Cerro Largo: 11.0 shots per match, Racing: 13.1.
Match halves
Cerro Largo: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Racing: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Cerro Largo: 76-90+ (5 goals). Racing: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite is Racing, who this season have 8 wins, 3 draws and only 1 loss, while Cerro Largo have 4 wins, 2 draws and 6 losses. Racing arrives in better form — in their last 5 away matches they have 4 wins and 1 draw, and over the last 5 fixtures they average 2.2 points versus Cerro’s 1.0. The visitors show a clear advantage in attack and quality of chances: 21 goals this season compared to the hosts’ 13, an average of 1.8 goals per away match versus 1.4 for Cerro, and 4.2 shots on target per game versus 2.8. This is supported by xG and defensive metrics: Racing have an average xG for of 1.51 versus Cerro’s 1.29, and Racing concede an average of 0.8 goals on the road while the hosts concede 1.0 goals per home match, suggesting superiority both in chance creation and in limiting threats. Additionally, Racing have no away clean sheets percentage (0% matches without conceding), while Cerro fail to score in 20% of home games; therefore I tip a Racing win and assess probabilities at 58% for the visitors, 24% for a draw and 18% for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes. Racing has BTTS at 80% this season and 100% in the last 5 matches, while Cerro Largo has 57% seasonally and 40% in the last 5, which together signals a strong likelihood of both teams scoring. Both sides create and concede goals: Cerro Largo averages 1.71 goals scored at home with xG_for 1.69 and concedes 1.0, whereas Racing scores 1.8 away with xG_for 1.51 and concedes 0.8 (Racing xG_against is 1.26, indicating higher risk of conceded goals). In the last 5 matches Racing averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, and Cerro Largo averaged 1.0 scored and 1.4 conceded, so current form favors goal exchange. Shot metrics confirm the threat: Cerro Largo has 5.29 shots on target and 13.71 total shots, Racing 4.20 on target and 12.20 total, with conversion rates of 13% versus 15%. Considering Racing’s seasonal 80% BTTS, Cerro Largo 57% and the league average 2.51 goals with BTTS 53%, I assess BTTS probability at 80% (No 20%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on attacking xG: Cerro Largo 1.69 vs Racing 1.51 and opponent defensive xG: Cerro Largo 1.01 vs Racing 1.26, I expect approximately 1.48 goals for the home side and 1.26 for the visitors, totaling 2.74 goals. Seasonal stats confirm a strong signal for Over 1.5 – Cerro Largo has Over 1.5 in 71% of matches, Racing in 80%, and both teams register BTTS in 57% and 80% of games respectively. The hosts average 5.29 shots on target and 13.71 total shots, the visitors 4.20 shots on target and 12.2 total shots, with conversion rates of 13% vs 15%, so there will be sufficient shooting opportunities. A Poisson model with mean 2.74 estimates probabilities of Over 1.5 at ~76%, Over 2.5 at ~52% and Over 3.5 at ~29%. Therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest line: high seasonal frequencies 71%/80%, an expected 2.74 goals and a 76% chance provide a clear edge for the Over side.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back HT/FT 1/2: Cerro Largo will lead at the break, but Racing will win the match. Cerro Largo led at half-time in 4 of 7 home matches (57%), averaging 0.86 goals scored and 0.43 conceded in the first half, with an xG of 1.69 and 5.29 shots on target per home game. Racing has an 80% win rate this season and averages 2.6 points per match, with 1.8 goals scored and 0.8 conceded on average, giving them the edge in the final result. Additionally, Racing performs better after the break: they have scored 4 goals in the 61–75 minute window, average 1.2 goals in the second half and collect 2.2 points on average in second halves with a 60% win rate in those periods versus 43% for home teams, which favors their turnaround.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cerro Largo | Racing | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Racing is 120% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Cerro Largo · 2.2 pts / match - Racing
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Racing is 62% better for: goals scored per match.
1.08 goals / match - Cerro Largo · 1.75 goals / match - Racing
Racing is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.25 goals / match - Cerro Largo · 0.92 goals / match - Racing
Cerro Largo scores in 58% of matches (7 of 12 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).
Racing scores in 100% of matches (12 of 12 matches), while Cerro Largo keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cerro Largo
Over / Under - Racing
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Racing is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - Cerro Largo · 1.67 pts / match - Racing
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cerro Largo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Racing - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cerro Largo
Racing
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Cerro Largo | Liga | Racing | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.33 | 2.52 | ▲ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 54% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 25% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 72% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 78% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Cerro Largo 0 - 2 - 0 Racing. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cerro Largo vs Racing?
The Primera División match finished Cerro Largo 0:1 Racing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cerro Largo and Racing?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Cerro Largo won 0, Racing won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cerro Largo vs Racing?
Cerro Largo score 1.08 goals per game on average and Racing 1.75. The Primera División average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Cerro Largo's matches and 67% of Racing's.
What form are Cerro Largo and Racing in?
Over the last 5 games Cerro Largo have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Racing 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cerro Largo vs Racing?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Cerro Largo vs Racing: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


