Chaco For Ever vs San Miguel: match statistics
Chaco For Ever vs San Miguel: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chaco For Ever played San Miguel in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The match was played on 26 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Juan Alberto García. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Chaco For Ever: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. San Miguel: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chaco For Ever scores 0.88 and concedes 1.16 goals per match. San Miguel scores 0.80 and concedes 1.00. League average: 1.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chaco For Ever 44%, San Miguel 40%. Over 2.5: Chaco For Ever 28%, San Miguel 24%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
San Miguel has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.22. Chaco For Ever: 9.6 shots per match, San Miguel: 10.8.
Match halves
Chaco For Ever: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.56. San Miguel: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.48.
Goals by minute
Chaco For Ever: 76-90+ (6 goals). San Miguel: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Prim B Nacional: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chaco For Ever are favorites primarily due to their clearly superior current form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 7 goals in that span, while San Miguel have scored just 2 goals and suffered 3 defeats. At home, the hosts average 1.18 goals with an xG of 1.38, whereas the visitors average only 0.67 goals away from home with an xG of 1.17 and fail to score in 50% of their matches. Chaco For Ever’s home defense also looks more solid, conceding an average of 1.09 goals compared with San Miguel’s 1.25 away from home. San Miguel often draw on the road, with as many as 58% of their away matches ending level, but they have won only 8% of those games. The hosts’ advantage in chances created, possession—52% compared with 45%—and current finishing form points to a narrow victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS - No is not clearly supported by the low scoring indicators of both teams: Chaco For Ever have seen both teams score in 33% of their matches, while the figure for San Miguel is 42%, against a league average of 40%. San Miguel score an average of just 0.67 goals per match and have netted only 2 goals in their last five games, averaging 0.4 per match, with both teams failing to score in any of those five fixtures. The hosts keep a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, while the visitors fail to score in 50% of their appearances, which particularly strengthens the scenario of only one team scoring or a 0:0 draw. Recent defensive form has also been solid, with Chaco conceding an average of 0.8 goals and San Miguel 0.6 goals across their last five matches. Although the visitors' xG over their last five games stands at 1.45, their poor finishing and just 2.83 shots on target per match make a San Miguel goal less likely than at least one side failing to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The profile of both teams clearly points to a low-scoring game: 83% of Chaco For Ever matches and 75% of San Miguel matches finished with Under 2.5 goals. The 3.5 line provides an even stronger signal, as none of the hosts’ matches went over it, while the visitors recorded Under 3.5 goals in 83% of cases. San Miguel scores an average of just 0.67 goals per match and has netted only 2 goals in its last five games, conceding 3. Chaco For Ever have been more effective recently, averaging 1.4 goals across five matches, while their defence allows just 0.67 goals per game on average this season and has kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches. The estimated total of 1.80 goals, combined with the low percentage of matches in which both teams scored—33% and 42%—further strengthens the case for Under 3.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Chaco For Ever have a clear quality advantage: they score an average of 0.92 goals and concede 0.67, while San Miguel score just 0.67 and allow opponents 1.25 goals per match. The hosts have won 42% of their matches, compared with only 8% for the visitors; moreover, Chaco have averaged 1.4 goals per game over their last five matches, compared with 0.4 for San Miguel. At half-time, a cautious picture remains the most likely, as both teams average 0.33 goals, while San Miguel have been level at the break in 58% of their matches. Nevertheless, Chaco have led at the break in 33% of their games, almost twice as often as their opponents (17%), and were ahead after the first half in 40% of their last five appearances. After the break, the hosts’ advantage should become more pronounced: they average 0.58 goals in the second half compared with San Miguel’s 0.33, while San Miguel’s defence concedes as many as 0.75 goals during this period. Therefore, the HT/FT 1/1 outcome—Chaco For Ever leading at half-time and securing the full-time victory—is the strongest option.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chaco For Ever | San Miguel | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chaco For Ever is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Chaco For Ever · 0.8 pts / match - San Miguel
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chaco For Ever is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
0.88 goals / match - Chaco For Ever · 0.8 goals / match - San Miguel
San Miguel is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.16 goals / match - Chaco For Ever · 1 goals / match - San Miguel
Chaco For Ever scores in 64% of matches (16 of 25 matches), while San Miguel keeps a clean sheet in 36% (9 of 25 matches).
San Miguel scores in 60% of matches (15 of 25 matches), while Chaco For Ever keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chaco For Ever
Over / Under - San Miguel
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
San Miguel is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Chaco For Ever · 1.2 pts / match - San Miguel
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chaco For Ever - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
San Miguel - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chaco For Ever
San Miguel
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).
Teams vs league
| Chaco For Ever | Liga | San Miguel | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.04 | 1.95 | ▼ 1.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 44% | 40% | • 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 28% | 32% | ▼ 24% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 28% | 38% | ▼ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 60% | 56% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 71% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Chaco For Ever 0 - 0 - 1 San Miguel. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Chaco For Ever vs San Miguel?
The Prim B Nacional match finished Chaco For Ever 3:0 San Miguel. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chaco For Ever vs San Miguel?
Chaco For Ever score 0.88 goals per game on average and San Miguel 0.80. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Chaco For Ever's matches and 40% of San Miguel's.
What form are Chaco For Ever and San Miguel in?
Over the last 5 games Chaco For Ever have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and San Miguel 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chaco For Ever vs San Miguel?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


