Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Chadormalu SC vs Paykan: match statistics

Chadormalu SC crest
Chadormalu SC
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Paykan crest
Paykan
135%(2.55)
X40%(2.75)
225%(2.95)

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match with a slight edge for a draw. Chadormalu SC shows solid home form with 67% clean sheets and a 0% loss rate at home, however their last five overall matches are a winless streak (0.4 PPG). Paykan displays better recent form (1.6 PPG) and higher offensive efficiency in away matches (3.2 shots on target per game). Both teams are characterized by low scoring efficiency - the hosts with an xG of 0.75 and the visitors averaging 0.78 goals per away match. Considering Chadormalu's defensive strength at home and Paykan's improving form, the most likely scenario is a share of the points in a low-scoring affair.

Chadormalu SC vs Paykan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chadormalu SC play Paykan in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match date is 8 February 2026 at 12:30. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Chadormalu SC: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Paykan: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chadormalu SC scores 1.23 and concedes 0.86 goals per match. Paykan scores 0.65 and concedes 0.91. League average: 1.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chadormalu SC 36%, Paykan 30%. Over 2.5: Chadormalu SC 32%, Paykan 17%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Paykan has higher xG: 1.14 vs 0.90. Chadormalu SC: 2.6 shots per match, Paykan: 3.6.

Match halves

Chadormalu SC: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.82. Paykan: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.22.

Goals by minute

Chadormalu SC: 76-90+ (11 goals). Paykan: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match with a slight edge for a draw. Chadormalu SC shows solid home form with 67% clean sheets and a 0% loss rate at home, however their last five overall matches are a winless streak (0.4 PPG). Paykan displays better recent form (1.6 PPG) and higher offensive efficiency in away matches (3.2 shots on target per game). Both teams are characterized by low scoring efficiency - the hosts with an xG of 0.75 and the visitors averaging 0.78 goals per away match. Considering Chadormalu's defensive strength at home and Paykan's improving form, the most likely scenario is a share of the points in a low-scoring affair.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Chadormalu SCPaykan
-1Shots-1
Chadormalu SCPaykan
-1Shots on target-1
Chadormalu SCPaykan
0xG0
Chadormalu SCPaykan
-1Corners-1
Chadormalu SCPaykan
0Dangerous attacks0
Chadormalu SCPaykan
-1Fouls-1
Chadormalu SCPaykan
4Cards3
Chadormalu SCPaykan

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chadormalu SCPaykan
1.23Goals scored / match0.65
Chadormalu SCPaykan
0.86Goals conceded / match0.91
Chadormalu SCPaykan
25%Average possession24%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
1.41Shots on target / match0.78
Chadormalu SCPaykan

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

2.64Shots per match3.65
Chadormalu SCPaykan
1.41Shots on target0.78
Chadormalu SCPaykan
46.6%Shot conversion17.9%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
25%Possession24%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
0.9xG for1.14
Chadormalu SCPaykan
1.23xG against0.96
Chadormalu SCPaykan

Shooting quality

Chadormalu SC: Counter-attackingPaykan: Counter-attacking
Chadormalu SCPaykan
Accuracy (shots on target)53%21%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.340.31
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.870.83

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chadormalu SC is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Chadormalu SC · 1 pts / match - Paykan

Chadormalu SC
LLWWW
Season result split
41% W36% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-5
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-5-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 0.80BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Paykan
WLLDD
Season result split
22% W39% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-9-9
1.04 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chadormalu SC is 89% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - Chadormalu SC · 0.65 goals / match - Paykan

Chadormalu SC is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.86 goals / match - Chadormalu SC · 0.91 goals / match - Paykan

Chadormalu SC scoring profile: mixed

Chadormalu SC scores in 55% of matches (12 of 22 matches), while Paykan keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 matches).

Paykan scoring profile: mixed

Paykan scores in 52% of matches (12 of 23 matches), while Chadormalu SC keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 matches).

27Goals scored (season)15
Chadormalu SCPaykan
19Goals conceded (season)21
Chadormalu SCPaykan
2.09Average goals in match1.57
Chadormalu SCPaykan
9Goals scored (last 5)2
Chadormalu SCPaykan
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
Chadormalu SCPaykan

How often they score at least...

55%1 goal52%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
36%2 goals13%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
18%3 goals0%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
9%4 goals0%
Chadormalu SCPaykan

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal61%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
18%2 goals30%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
9%3 goals0%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
5%4 goals0%
Chadormalu SCPaykan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time17%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
9%BTTS in both halves4%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
32%Scored in both halves4%
Chadormalu SCPaykan

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
20%BTTS - last 520%
Chadormalu SCPaykan

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

41%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Chadormalu SCPaykan

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Chadormalu SCPaykan

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paykan is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / match - Chadormalu SC · 1.35 pts / match - Paykan

Chadormalu SC - half-time state
14% leading77% draw9% trailing
Paykan - half-time state
26% leading57% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)1.35
Chadormalu SCPaykan
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.43
Chadormalu SCPaykan
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Chadormalu SCPaykan
0.77Average goals (1st half)0.78
Chadormalu SCPaykan
73%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
68%No goal before half-time61%
Chadormalu SCPaykan

After half-time (2nd half)

1.59Points per match (2nd half)0.74
Chadormalu SCPaykan
0.82Goals scored (2nd half)0.22
Chadormalu SCPaykan
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
Chadormalu SCPaykan
1.32Average goals (2nd half)0.78
Chadormalu SCPaykan
64%Clean sheet after half-time52%
Chadormalu SCPaykan
45%No goal after half-time83%
Chadormalu SCPaykan

Chadormalu SC - second-half results

36% W50% R14% P
26
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding293%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Paykan - second-half results

9% W48% R43% P
31
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 22%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chadormalu SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Paykan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chadormalu SC
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
3
31-45
2
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
11
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Paykan
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
1
16-30
4
4
31-45
1
4
46-60
1
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chadormalu SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

Paykan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Chadormalu SCLigaPaykan
Average goals in match 2.091.79 1.57
Both teams scored 36%38% 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%28% 17%
Clean sheets 45%41% 39%
Goal before half-time 41%54% 57%
Goal after half-time 64%62% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.79
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.01
Home goals / match
0.79
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Chadormalu SC 0 - 1 - 0 Paykan. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Paykan
0 : 0
Chadormalu SC

FAQ

What was the result of Chadormalu SC vs Paykan?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Chadormalu SC 2:0 Paykan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chadormalu SC vs Paykan?

Chadormalu SC score 1.23 goals per game on average and Paykan 0.65. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Chadormalu SC's matches and 30% of Paykan's.

What form are Chadormalu SC and Paykan in?

Over the last 5 games Chadormalu SC have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Paykan 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chadormalu SC vs Paykan?

The statistical background for Chadormalu SC vs Paykan — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.