Chadormalu SC vs Shams Azar Qazvin: match statistics
Chadormalu SC presents decidedly better home form with 50% wins and zero losses at their own stadium, while Shams Azar Qazvin has just 14% victories on the road. The hosts demonstrate significantly higher shooting efficiency (24% shot conversion versus 9% for the guests) and average 1 goal per match at home, whereas the guests score a mere 0.29 goals away. Shams Azar Qazvin fails to score in 71% of away matches and is currently on a weak streak of five consecutive draws, indicating a lack of offensive power. Although the visitors possess a solid away defense (71% clean sheets), their total lack of effectiveness in attack makes them largely non-threatening. The difference in class and form points to a home win, though the visitors' defensive stance might result in a low-scoring affair. The xG statistics (0.75 for the hosts versus 0.81 for the guests) are close, but Chadormalu SC's actual efficiency exceeds model expectations, giving them the edge.
Chadormalu SC vs Shams Azar Qazvin: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chadormalu SC played Shams Azar Qazvin in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 23 January 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Chadormalu SC: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Shams Azar Qazvin: 0-5-0, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chadormalu SC scores 1.13 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Shams Azar Qazvin scores 0.63 and concedes 0.81. League average: 1.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chadormalu SC 44%, Shams Azar Qazvin 38%. Over 2.5: Chadormalu SC 38%, Shams Azar Qazvin 13%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 27%.
xG, shots and style
Shams Azar Qazvin has higher xG: 0.94 vs 0.90. Chadormalu SC: 3.5 shots per match, Shams Azar Qazvin: 4.6.
Match halves
Chadormalu SC: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.75. Shams Azar Qazvin: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.44.
Goals by minute
Chadormalu SC: 76-90+ (6 goals). Shams Azar Qazvin: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.75 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 27%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 8.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chadormalu SC presents decidedly better home form with 50% wins and zero losses at their own stadium, while Shams Azar Qazvin has just 14% victories on the road. The hosts demonstrate significantly higher shooting efficiency (24% shot conversion versus 9% for the guests) and average 1 goal per match at home, whereas the guests score a mere 0.29 goals away. Shams Azar Qazvin fails to score in 71% of away matches and is currently on a weak streak of five consecutive draws, indicating a lack of offensive power. Although the visitors possess a solid away defense (71% clean sheets), their total lack of effectiveness in attack makes them largely non-threatening. The difference in class and form points to a home win, though the visitors' defensive stance might result in a low-scoring affair. The xG statistics (0.75 for the hosts versus 0.81 for the guests) are close, but Chadormalu SC's actual efficiency exceeds model expectations, giving them the edge.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chadormalu SC | Shams Azar Qazvin | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 55% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.26 | 0.21 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.58 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chadormalu SC is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Chadormalu SC · 1 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chadormalu SC is 79% better for: goals scored per match.
1.13 goals / match - Chadormalu SC · 0.63 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin
Shams Azar Qazvin is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Chadormalu SC · 0.81 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin
Chadormalu SC scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while Shams Azar Qazvin keeps a clean sheet in 44% (7 of 16 matches).
Shams Azar Qazvin scores in 44% of matches (7 of 16 matches), while Chadormalu SC keeps a clean sheet in 44% (7 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chadormalu SC
Over / Under - Shams Azar Qazvin
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chadormalu SC is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / match - Chadormalu SC · 0.81 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chadormalu SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Shams Azar Qazvin - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chadormalu SC
Shams Azar Qazvin
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Chadormalu SC | Liga | Shams Azar Qazvin | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.13 | 1.75 | ▼ 1.44 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 44% | 38% | • 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 38% | 27% | ▼ 13% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 42% | ▲ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 31% | 53% | ▼ 31% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 63% | 59% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Chadormalu SC 0 - 1 - 0 Shams Azar Qazvin. Average goals 8.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Chadormalu SC vs Shams Azar Qazvin?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Chadormalu SC 0:0 Shams Azar Qazvin. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chadormalu SC vs Shams Azar Qazvin?
Chadormalu SC score 1.13 goals per game on average and Shams Azar Qazvin 0.63. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Chadormalu SC's matches and 38% of Shams Azar Qazvin's.
What form are Chadormalu SC and Shams Azar Qazvin in?
Over the last 5 games Chadormalu SC have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Shams Azar Qazvin 0-5-0 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chadormalu SC vs Shams Azar Qazvin?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chadormalu SC vs Shams Azar Qazvin: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.