India - I-LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Chanmari vs Dempo: match statistics

Chanmari crest
Chanmari
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Dempo crest
Dempo

Chanmari vs Dempo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chanmari played Dempo in I-League (India). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Chanmari: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Dempo: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chanmari scores 1.27 and concedes 1.82 goals per match. Dempo scores 1.36 and concedes 1.27. League average: 3.07 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chanmari 64%, Dempo 55%. Over 2.5: Chanmari 64%, Dempo 64%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Chanmari has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.46. Chanmari: 11.2 shots per match, Dempo: 10.2.

Match halves

Chanmari: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.64. Dempo: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Chanmari: 46-60 (4 goals). Dempo: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

I-League: 3.07 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win (Dempo). Dempo have scored 8 goals in their last 5 matches and average 2.0 points per game in that period, while Chanmari have 7 goals and only 1.2 points per game. The key advantage for the visitors is defensive form — Dempo have conceded just 2 goals in their last five matches, whereas the hosts have conceded 11 in their last 5 (avg. 2.2 per game). Chanmari create more chances at home (avg. 12.8 shots, 5 on target and xG 1.63) but convert that into only 1.0 goal per game with a conversion rate of 8%, which limits their effectiveness. Considering Dempo’s run (3 wins in 5), better recent form and fewer goals conceded, the visitors look like favourites, although Chanmari’s high home draw rate (60% draws) also gives a realistic chance of a point share.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Based on the data I lean toward BTTS: I assign 65% to 'Yes' and 35% to 'No'. Chanmari at home scores on average 2.0 goals per match with xG 1.58, 5.4 shots on target and 20% conversion, while Dempo away this season averages only 0.83 goals per match, 3.5 shots on target and 8% accuracy. A key signal for BTTS is the last 5 matches — Chanmari conceded 11 goals (2.2 per match) and Dempo scored 8 goals (1.6 per match), so the hosts are vulnerable to opponent goals. Additionally, season BTTS rates are 60% for Chanmari and 50% for Dempo, and the league overall has 62% of matches with both teams scoring, which together increases the probability of Goal/Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate expected goals at 1.72 for Chanmari and 1.26 for Dempo, totalling approximately 2.98 goals. A strong signal is that Chanmari have 100% of home matches with at least 2 goals, while Dempo’s away fixtures have seen at least 2 goals in 67% of games, clearly supporting Over 1.5. At the 2.5 line there is a moderate signal for Over: Chanmari record Over 2.5 in 80% of matches, Dempo in 50%, and the projected 2.98 goals exceeds 2.5, so Over 2.5 is also plausible. Additionally, Chanmari average 5.4 shots on target and have 1.58 xG versus 1.85 xG conceded by Dempo away, and Chanmari’s conversion rate is 20% compared to Dempo’s 8%, which favors the hosts to score. Based on this, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 and that is the recommended side to back.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Chanmari have a clear advantage in the first half: they led at the break in 3 of 5 matches (60%), average 1.2 goals by half-time and 100% of matches with at least one goal before the break. Dempo, conversely, did not lead at half-time (0%) and average only 0.17 goals before the break, which makes it difficult for them to take a lead. Over the full match the hosts score an average of 2.0 goals versus 0.83 for the visitors and collect 1.6 points per match compared to 0.83 for Dempo, with the gap also visible in win share (40% vs 17%). Additionally, Chanmari show better efficiency (conversion rate 20% vs 8%) and xG 1.58 versus 1.38, while the away side concede an xG against of 1.85 compared to 1.13 for the hosts, suggesting Chanmari are more likely to convert their chances. Considering the 60% probability of Chanmari leading at the break and superior attacking and defensive metrics, the most likely scenario is 1/1 (I assess at 42%), with lower likelihoods for a draw or a Dempo turnaround.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
ChanmariDempo
6Shots6
ChanmariDempo
2Shots on target0
ChanmariDempo
0.97xG0.82
ChanmariDempo
6Corners9
ChanmariDempo
60Dangerous attacks60
ChanmariDempo
13Fouls13
ChanmariDempo
3Cards0
ChanmariDempo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.27Goals scored / match1.36
ChanmariDempo
1.82Goals conceded / match1.27
ChanmariDempo
48%Average possession47%
ChanmariDempo
4.27Shots on target / match4.36
ChanmariDempo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.18Shots per match10.18
ChanmariDempo
4.27Shots on target4.36
ChanmariDempo
11.4%Shot conversion13.4%
ChanmariDempo
48%Possession47%
ChanmariDempo
1.49xG for1.46
ChanmariDempo
1.55xG against1.56
ChanmariDempo

Shooting quality

Chanmari: BalancedDempo: Counter-attacking
ChanmariDempo
Accuracy (shots on target)38%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dempo is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Chanmari · 2 pts / match - Dempo

Chanmari
WLWLL
Season result split
27% W27% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-5
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-1
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Dempo
WWLDW
Season result split
27% W36% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-4
1.18 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dempo is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - Chanmari · 1.36 goals / match - Dempo

Dempo is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.82 goals / match - Chanmari · 1.27 goals / match - Dempo

Chanmari scoring profile: strong

Chanmari scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Dempo keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).

Dempo scoring profile: very strong

Dempo scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Chanmari keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).

14Goals scored (season)15
ChanmariDempo
20Goals conceded (season)14
ChanmariDempo
3.09Average goals in match2.64
ChanmariDempo
7Goals scored (last 5)8
ChanmariDempo
11Goals conceded (last 5)2
ChanmariDempo

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal82%
ChanmariDempo
45%2 goals36%
ChanmariDempo
9%3 goals18%
ChanmariDempo
9%4 goals0%
ChanmariDempo

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal64%
ChanmariDempo
55%2 goals55%
ChanmariDempo
27%3 goals9%
ChanmariDempo
9%4 goals0%
ChanmariDempo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time27%
ChanmariDempo
0%BTTS in both halves9%
ChanmariDempo
18%Scored in both halves36%
ChanmariDempo

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
ChanmariDempo
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
ChanmariDempo
60%BTTS - last 520%
ChanmariDempo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
ChanmariDempo
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
ChanmariDempo
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
ChanmariDempo

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
ChanmariDempo
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
ChanmariDempo
45%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
ChanmariDempo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chanmari is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.73 pts / match - Chanmari · 1.18 pts / match - Dempo

Chanmari - half-time state
45% leading36% draw18% trailing
Dempo - half-time state
27% leading36% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.73Points per match (1st half)1.18
ChanmariDempo
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.64
ChanmariDempo
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
ChanmariDempo
0.91Average goals (1st half)1.36
ChanmariDempo
73%Clean sheet before half-time45%
ChanmariDempo
55%No goal before half-time45%
ChanmariDempo

After half-time (2nd half)

0.73Points per match (2nd half)1.55
ChanmariDempo
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
ChanmariDempo
1.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
ChanmariDempo
2.18Average goals (2nd half)1.27
ChanmariDempo
9%Clean sheet after half-time55%
ChanmariDempo
64%No goal after half-time36%
ChanmariDempo

Chanmari - second-half results

18% W18% R64% P
19
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding60%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.3

Concedes 1.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dempo - second-half results

36% W45% R18% P
13
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chanmari - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.8
Average goals in match0.82.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Dempo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chanmari
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
3
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
1
6
61-75
2
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Dempo
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
4
31-45
3
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.86
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chanmari

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Dempo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).

Teams vs league

ChanmariLigaDempo
Average goals in match 3.093.07 2.64
Both teams scored 64%63% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%57% 64%
Clean sheets 9%21% 36%
Goal before half-time 64%71% 82%
Goal after half-time 91%89% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.07
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ChanmariYellow cardMarlon Rangel de Almeida
  2. ChanmariYellow cardAron Vanlalrinchhana
  3. ChanmariYellow cardAron Vanlalrinchhana
  4. ChanmariSubstitutionOn: Lalpekhlua LalpekhluaOff: Malsawmsanga KC

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Chanmari 0 - 1 - 0 Dempo. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Chanmari vs Dempo?

The I-League match finished Chanmari 2:0 Dempo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chanmari vs Dempo?

Chanmari score 1.27 goals per game on average and Dempo 1.36. The I-League average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Chanmari's matches and 55% of Dempo's.

What form are Chanmari and Dempo in?

Over the last 5 games Chanmari have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Dempo 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chanmari vs Dempo?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chanmari vs Dempo: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.