India - I-LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong: match statistics

Chanmari crest
Chanmari
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Shillong Lajong crest
Shillong Lajong
145%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Chanmari FC displays solid home form with a three-match unbeaten streak at home (draw-win-draw) and a goal difference of +1 at their own stadium. The hosts stand out with their effectiveness in home matches, scoring an average of 1.33 goals with a decent shot conversion rate of 10%. Shillong Lajong has not played any official away match this season, which confirms the absence of any away statistics – this is a significant risk factor for the visitors. Chanmari holds the advantage of experience at their own venue and more stable form, which speaks in favor of their victory. Considering the hosts' tendency for draws (67% of home matches) and the lack of data on Shillong's away strength, there is also a realistic chance of a points split, but the home advantage and Chanmari's effectiveness so far give them the highest chances of securing three points.

Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chanmari played Shillong Lajong in I-League (India). The match was played on 19 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Chanmari: 1-2-0, 1.67 points/match. Shillong Lajong: 1-1-1, 1.33 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chanmari scores 1.33 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Shillong Lajong scores 1.33 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chanmari 67%, Shillong Lajong 100%. Over 2.5: Chanmari 67%, Shillong Lajong 67%. League level: BTTS 75%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Chanmari has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.37. Chanmari: 13.3 shots per match, Shillong Lajong: 8.0.

Match halves

Chanmari: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Shillong Lajong: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Chanmari: 0-15 (1 goals). Shillong Lajong: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

I-League: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 75%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chanmari FC displays solid home form with a three-match unbeaten streak at home (draw-win-draw) and a goal difference of +1 at their own stadium. The hosts stand out with their effectiveness in home matches, scoring an average of 1.33 goals with a decent shot conversion rate of 10%. Shillong Lajong has not played any official away match this season, which confirms the absence of any away statistics – this is a significant risk factor for the visitors. Chanmari holds the advantage of experience at their own venue and more stable form, which speaks in favor of their victory. Considering the hosts' tendency for draws (67% of home matches) and the lack of data on Shillong's away strength, there is also a realistic chance of a points split, but the home advantage and Chanmari's effectiveness so far give them the highest chances of securing three points.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
ChanmariShillong Lajong
12Shots9
ChanmariShillong Lajong
5Shots on target7
ChanmariShillong Lajong
1.8xG1.65
ChanmariShillong Lajong
8Corners5
ChanmariShillong Lajong
97Dangerous attacks82
ChanmariShillong Lajong
-1Fouls-1
ChanmariShillong Lajong
1Cards1
ChanmariShillong Lajong

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ChanmariShillong Lajong
1.33Goals scored / match1.33
ChanmariShillong Lajong
1Goals conceded / match1.33
ChanmariShillong Lajong
48%Average possession56%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
6Shots on target / match2.67
ChanmariShillong Lajong

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.33Shots per match8
ChanmariShillong Lajong
6Shots on target2.67
ChanmariShillong Lajong
10%Shot conversion16.7%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
48%Possession56%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
1.69xG for1.37
ChanmariShillong Lajong
1.5xG against1.26
ChanmariShillong Lajong

Shooting quality

Chanmari: BalancedShillong Lajong: Efficient finishing
ChanmariShillong Lajong
Accuracy (shots on target)45%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chanmari is 26% better for: last-5 form.

1.67 pts / match - Chanmari · 1.33 pts / match - Shillong Lajong

Chanmari
DWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W67% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-0
1.67 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 at home
1-2-0
DWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%
Shillong Lajong
DWL
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chanmari is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Chanmari · 1.33 goals / match - Shillong Lajong

Chanmari scoring profile: very strong

Chanmari scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Shillong Lajong keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

Shillong Lajong scoring profile: very strong

Shillong Lajong scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Chanmari keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

4Goals scored (season)4
ChanmariShillong Lajong
3Goals conceded (season)4
ChanmariShillong Lajong
2.33Average goals in match2.67
ChanmariShillong Lajong
4Goals scored (last 5)4
ChanmariShillong Lajong
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
ChanmariShillong Lajong

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal100%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
67%2 goals33%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
0%3 goals0%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
0%4 goals0%
ChanmariShillong Lajong

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal100%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
33%2 goals33%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
0%3 goals0%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
0%4 goals0%
ChanmariShillong Lajong

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

75%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time33%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
0%Scored in both halves33%
ChanmariShillong Lajong

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
67%BTTS - last 5100%
ChanmariShillong Lajong

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ChanmariShillong Lajong

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
ChanmariShillong Lajong

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chanmari is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Chanmari · 1.33 pts / match - Shillong Lajong

Chanmari - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
Shillong Lajong - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)1.33
ChanmariShillong Lajong
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.67
ChanmariShillong Lajong
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)1
ChanmariShillong Lajong
1Average goals (1st half)1.67
ChanmariShillong Lajong
67%Clean sheet before half-time33%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
67%No goal before half-time33%
ChanmariShillong Lajong

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)2
ChanmariShillong Lajong
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
ChanmariShillong Lajong
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
ChanmariShillong Lajong
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1
ChanmariShillong Lajong
33%Clean sheet after half-time67%
ChanmariShillong Lajong
67%No goal after half-time33%
ChanmariShillong Lajong

Chanmari - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shillong Lajong - second-half results

67% W0% R33% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.7

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chanmari - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.671.33
Goals scored / match0.70.7
Goals conceded / match0.30.7
Average goals in match1.01.3
1 goal33%67%
2 goals33%33%
3 goals33%33%
Clean sheet67%33%
No goal67%67%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 33% leading - 67% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 2
Shillong Lajong - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.332.00
Goals scored / match0.70.7
Goals conceded / match1.00.3
Average goals in match1.71.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals67%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet33%67%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 0% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chanmari
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Shillong Lajong
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
84%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chanmari

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Shillong Lajong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).

Teams vs league

ChanmariLigaShillong Lajong
Average goals in match 2.332.63 2.67
Both teams scored 67%75% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%56% 67%
Clean sheets 33%16% 0%
Goal before half-time 33%75% 100%
Goal after half-time 67%88% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
75%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
16%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Shillong LajongYellow cardKenstar Kharshong
  2. ChanmariYellow cardZothanmawia Zothanmawia
  3. Shillong LajongSubstitutionOn: Treimiki LamurongOff: Abhay Gurung
  4. Shillong LajongSubstitutionOn: Wadajied Kynsai RyngkhlemOff: Gladdy Nelcen Kharbuli
  5. Shillong LajongSubstitutionOn: Jakob VanlalhlimpuiaOff: Everbrightson Sana Mylliempdah
  6. Shillong LajongGoalPhrangki BuamAssist: Jakob Vanlalhlimpuia

FAQ

What was the result of Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong?

The I-League match finished Chanmari 1:1 Shillong Lajong. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong?

Chanmari score 1.33 goals per game on average and Shillong Lajong 1.33. The I-League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Chanmari's matches and 100% of Shillong Lajong's.

What form are Chanmari and Shillong Lajong in?

Over the last 5 games Chanmari have a 1-2-0 record (1.67 points per game) and Shillong Lajong 1-1-1 (1.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.