Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong: match statistics
Chanmari FC displays solid home form with a three-match unbeaten streak at home (draw-win-draw) and a goal difference of +1 at their own stadium. The hosts stand out with their effectiveness in home matches, scoring an average of 1.33 goals with a decent shot conversion rate of 10%. Shillong Lajong has not played any official away match this season, which confirms the absence of any away statistics – this is a significant risk factor for the visitors. Chanmari holds the advantage of experience at their own venue and more stable form, which speaks in favor of their victory. Considering the hosts' tendency for draws (67% of home matches) and the lack of data on Shillong's away strength, there is also a realistic chance of a points split, but the home advantage and Chanmari's effectiveness so far give them the highest chances of securing three points.
Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chanmari play Shillong Lajong in I-League (India). The match date is 19 March 2026 at 11:30. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Chanmari: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Shillong Lajong: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chanmari scores 1.36 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. Shillong Lajong scores 1.93 and concedes 0.86. League average: 3.03 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chanmari 64%, Shillong Lajong 50%. Over 2.5: Chanmari 64%, Shillong Lajong 50%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Shillong Lajong has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.47. Chanmari: 11.2 shots per match, Shillong Lajong: 9.5.
Match halves
Chanmari: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.71. Shillong Lajong: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.21.
Goals by minute
Chanmari: 76-90+ (5 goals). Shillong Lajong: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
I-League: 3.03 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Chanmari FC displays solid home form with a three-match unbeaten streak at home (draw-win-draw) and a goal difference of +1 at their own stadium. The hosts stand out with their effectiveness in home matches, scoring an average of 1.33 goals with a decent shot conversion rate of 10%. Shillong Lajong has not played any official away match this season, which confirms the absence of any away statistics – this is a significant risk factor for the visitors. Chanmari holds the advantage of experience at their own venue and more stable form, which speaks in favor of their victory. Considering the hosts' tendency for draws (67% of home matches) and the lack of data on Shillong's away strength, there is also a realistic chance of a points split, but the home advantage and Chanmari's effectiveness so far give them the highest chances of securing three points.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chanmari | Shillong Lajong | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.48 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Shillong Lajong is 175% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Chanmari · 2.2 pts / match - Shillong Lajong
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shillong Lajong is 42% better for: goals scored per match.
1.36 goals / match - Chanmari · 1.93 goals / match - Shillong Lajong
Shillong Lajong is 99% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.71 goals / match - Chanmari · 0.86 goals / match - Shillong Lajong
Chanmari scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Shillong Lajong keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 matches).
Shillong Lajong scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Chanmari keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Chanmari
Over / Under — Shillong Lajong
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chanmari - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Shillong Lajong - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chanmari
Shillong Lajong
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).
Teams vs league
| Chanmari | Liga | Shillong Lajong | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.07 | 3.03 | ▼ 2.79 |
| Both teams scored | • 64% | 64% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 56% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 20% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 73% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 86% | 89% | ▼ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Chanmari 0 - 0 - 1 Shillong Lajong. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong?
The I-League match finished Chanmari 1:1 Shillong Lajong. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong?
Chanmari score 1.36 goals per game on average and Shillong Lajong 1.93. The I-League average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Chanmari's matches and 50% of Shillong Lajong's.
What form are Chanmari and Shillong Lajong in?
Over the last 5 games Chanmari have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Shillong Lajong 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chanmari vs Shillong Lajong: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.