Charleston Battery vs Hartford Athletic: match statistics
Charleston Battery vs Hartford Athletic: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Charleston Battery played Hartford Athletic in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 2 September 2026. Venue: MUSC Health Stadium. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Charleston Battery: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Hartford Athletic: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Charleston Battery scores 2.09 and concedes 1.23 goals per match. Hartford Athletic scores 0.90 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.69 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Charleston Battery 45%, Hartford Athletic 35%. Over 2.5: Charleston Battery 59%, Hartford Athletic 40%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Charleston Battery has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.45. Charleston Battery: 12.7 shots per match, Hartford Athletic: 12.2.
Match halves
Charleston Battery: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 1.14. Hartford Athletic: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Charleston Battery: 76-90+ (11 goals). Hartford Athletic: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 75%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Charleston Battery are very strong at home: they have won 80% of their matches, remain unbeaten on home soil, and average 3.2 goals per game. The hosts also create significantly more chances, recording 16.3 shots and 7.5 shots on target per match, with an xG of 1.98, while Hartford averages just 0.64 goals and 1.24 xG away from home. The visitors have failed to score in as many as 64% of their away matches, while their 42% possession and average of 3.18 shots on target should limit their attacking potential. Hartford defend relatively solidly, conceding an average of 0.73 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 45% of away matches, but they allow opponents an xG of 1.83, which is a significant concern against Charleston’s attacking strength. The last five matches also favour the hosts, who have scored 13 goals and won 3 times, making a Charleston victory the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal in favor of BTTS - No comes from Hartford’s seasonal profile: both teams scored in only 18% of its matches, while Hartford failed to score in 64% of games. Hartford averages just 0.64 goals per match, with a 6% shot conversion rate, whereas Charleston keeps a clean sheet in 38% of its appearances. The visitors do have the better recent run, averaging 1.4 goals and recording BTTS in 60% of their last 5 matches, but their long-term attacking output remains clearly below the league BTTS benchmark of 53%. Charleston have been highly effective lately, scoring 2.6 goals per match across their last five games, so a goal from them is likely; however, the more realistic scenario is that Hartford fail to respond with a goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Hartford play very tight matches: as many as 82% of their games have finished with under 2.5 goals, and 100% with under 3.5. The visitors score just 0.64 goals per match on average, with a 6% shot conversion rate, while Charleston keep a clean sheet in 38% of their games. The hosts have greater attacking potential, as reflected by an average xG of 1.67 and 2.6 goals scored in their last five appearances, but Hartford concede just 0.73 goals per match on average. The recent form of both teams raises the projection to 2.60 goals, but still does not point to a scenario with at least four goals. The strongest signal is therefore Under 3.5, supported by Hartford’s season-long defensive record and the fact that none of their matches have featured four goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point, as Charleston were level after 45 minutes in 63% of their matches, compared with 36% for Hartford. The hosts score just 0.25 goals per game before the break, while Hartford keep a clean sheet in this period in 64% of their appearances, limiting the likelihood of Charleston taking an early lead. After the break, however, the advantage should shift towards Battery: they average 0.75 goals compared with Hartford’s 0.27, while over their last five matches the difference is as much as 1.6 to 0.8. Charleston also have the higher average xG, at 1.67 versus their opponents’ 1.24, while Hartford’s defence concedes an average xG of 1.83. The HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time followed by a home win at the final whistle best combines a cautious start with Charleston’s greater second-half potential.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Charleston Battery | Hartford Athletic | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Charleston Battery is 50% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.6 pts / match - Hartford Athletic
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Charleston Battery is 132% better for: goals scored per match.
2.09 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 0.9 goals / match - Hartford Athletic
Hartford Athletic is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.23 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1 goals / match - Hartford Athletic
Charleston Battery scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Hartford Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).
Hartford Athletic scores in 45% of matches (9 of 20 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Charleston Battery
Over / Under - Hartford Athletic
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Charleston Battery is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.73 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.1 pts / match - Hartford Athletic
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Charleston Battery - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Hartford Athletic - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Charleston Battery
Hartford Athletic
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Charleston Battery | Liga | Hartford Athletic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.32 | 2.69 | ▼ 1.90 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 53% | ▼ 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 59% | 49% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 28% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | • 64% | 65% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 95% | 78% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Charleston Battery 3 - 1 - 0 Hartford Athletic. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 75% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Charleston Battery vs Hartford Athletic?
The USL Championship match finished Charleston Battery 1:2 Hartford Athletic. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Charleston Battery and Hartford Athletic?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Charleston Battery won 3, Hartford Athletic won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Charleston Battery vs Hartford Athletic?
Charleston Battery score 2.09 goals per game on average and Hartford Athletic 0.90. The USL Championship average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Charleston Battery's matches and 35% of Hartford Athletic's.
What form are Charleston Battery and Hartford Athletic in?
Over the last 5 games Charleston Battery have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Hartford Athletic 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charleston Battery vs Hartford Athletic?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Charleston Battery vs Hartford Athletic: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


