United States - USL ChampionshipMUSC Health StadiumData current as of 17 October 2026

Charleston Battery vs Hartford Athletic: match statistics

Charleston Battery vs Hartford Athletic: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Charleston Battery played Hartford Athletic in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 2 September 2026. Venue: MUSC Health Stadium. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Charleston Battery: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Hartford Athletic: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Charleston Battery scores 2.09 and concedes 1.23 goals per match. Hartford Athletic scores 0.90 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.69 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Charleston Battery 45%, Hartford Athletic 35%. Over 2.5: Charleston Battery 59%, Hartford Athletic 40%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Charleston Battery has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.45. Charleston Battery: 12.7 shots per match, Hartford Athletic: 12.2.

Match halves

Charleston Battery: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 1.14. Hartford Athletic: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Charleston Battery: 76-90+ (11 goals). Hartford Athletic: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Charleston Battery are very strong at home: they have won 80% of their matches, remain unbeaten on home soil, and average 3.2 goals per game. The hosts also create significantly more chances, recording 16.3 shots and 7.5 shots on target per match, with an xG of 1.98, while Hartford averages just 0.64 goals and 1.24 xG away from home. The visitors have failed to score in as many as 64% of their away matches, while their 42% possession and average of 3.18 shots on target should limit their attacking potential. Hartford defend relatively solidly, conceding an average of 0.73 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 45% of away matches, but they allow opponents an xG of 1.83, which is a significant concern against Charleston’s attacking strength. The last five matches also favour the hosts, who have scored 13 goals and won 3 times, making a Charleston victory the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal in favor of BTTS - No comes from Hartford’s seasonal profile: both teams scored in only 18% of its matches, while Hartford failed to score in 64% of games. Hartford averages just 0.64 goals per match, with a 6% shot conversion rate, whereas Charleston keeps a clean sheet in 38% of its appearances. The visitors do have the better recent run, averaging 1.4 goals and recording BTTS in 60% of their last 5 matches, but their long-term attacking output remains clearly below the league BTTS benchmark of 53%. Charleston have been highly effective lately, scoring 2.6 goals per match across their last five games, so a goal from them is likely; however, the more realistic scenario is that Hartford fail to respond with a goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Hartford play very tight matches: as many as 82% of their games have finished with under 2.5 goals, and 100% with under 3.5. The visitors score just 0.64 goals per match on average, with a 6% shot conversion rate, while Charleston keep a clean sheet in 38% of their games. The hosts have greater attacking potential, as reflected by an average xG of 1.67 and 2.6 goals scored in their last five appearances, but Hartford concede just 0.73 goals per match on average. The recent form of both teams raises the projection to 2.60 goals, but still does not point to a scenario with at least four goals. The strongest signal is therefore Under 3.5, supported by Hartford’s season-long defensive record and the fact that none of their matches have featured four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point, as Charleston were level after 45 minutes in 63% of their matches, compared with 36% for Hartford. The hosts score just 0.25 goals per game before the break, while Hartford keep a clean sheet in this period in 64% of their appearances, limiting the likelihood of Charleston taking an early lead. After the break, however, the advantage should shift towards Battery: they average 0.75 goals compared with Hartford’s 0.27, while over their last five matches the difference is as much as 1.6 to 0.8. Charleston also have the higher average xG, at 1.67 versus their opponents’ 1.24, while Hartford’s defence concedes an average xG of 1.83. The HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time followed by a home win at the final whistle best combines a cautious start with Charleston’s greater second-half potential.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
17Shots12
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
7Shots on target3
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
1.92xG1.34
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
7Corners5
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
51Dangerous attacks52
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
7Fouls21
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
3Cards3
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
2.09Goals scored / match0.9
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
1.23Goals conceded / match1
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
57%Average possession45%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
5.27Shots on target / match3.8
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.73Shots per match12.15
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
5.27Shots on target3.8
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
16.4%Shot conversion7.4%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
57%Possession45%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
1.56xG for1.45
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
1.3xG against1.59
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic

Shooting quality

Charleston Battery: Efficient finishingHartford Athletic: Balanced
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
Accuracy (shots on target)41%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Charleston Battery is 50% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.6 pts / match - Hartford Athletic

Charleston Battery
WWLWW
Season result split
55% W14% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-3-7
1.77 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Hartford Athletic
DLDWW
Season result split
30% W45% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-5
1.35 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-4
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Charleston Battery is 132% better for: goals scored per match.

2.09 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 0.9 goals / match - Hartford Athletic

Hartford Athletic is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.23 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1 goals / match - Hartford Athletic

Charleston Battery scoring profile: strong

Charleston Battery scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Hartford Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).

Hartford Athletic scoring profile: mixed

Hartford Athletic scores in 45% of matches (9 of 20 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

46Goals scored (season)18
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
27Goals conceded (season)20
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
3.32Average goals in match1.9
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
14Goals scored (last 5)6
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal45%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
55%2 goals35%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
32%3 goals10%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
27%4 goals0%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal60%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
36%2 goals30%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
14%3 goals5%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
5%4 goals5%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
Charleston Battery - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 22 matches
35%
Hartford Athletic - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 20 matches
53%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time10%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
5%BTTS in both halves0%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
41%Scored in both halves20%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
23%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
20%BTTS - last 560%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
59%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
36%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charleston Battery is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.73 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.1 pts / match - Hartford Athletic

Charleston Battery - half-time state
45% leading36% draw18% trailing
Hartford Athletic - half-time state
20% leading50% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.73Points per match (1st half)1.1
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
0.95Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
1.36Average goals (1st half)1
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
73%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
50%No goal before half-time70%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic

After half-time (2nd half)

1.68Points per match (2nd half)1.3
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
1.14Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
0.82Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
1.95Average goals (2nd half)0.9
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
41%Clean sheet after half-time65%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic
32%No goal after half-time65%
Charleston BatteryHartford Athletic

Charleston Battery - second-half results

50% W18% D32% L
38
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Hartford Athletic - second-half results

30% W40% D30% L
22
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Charleston Battery - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.40
Goals scored / match1.21.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+4+7
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Hartford Athletic - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match1.60.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Charleston Battery
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
8
4
16-30
8
2
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
6
61-75
11
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Hartford Athletic
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
6
61-75
6
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.61
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Charleston Battery

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Hartford Athletic

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Charleston BatteryLigaHartford Athletic
Average goals in match▲ 3.322.69▼ 1.90
Both teams scored▼ 45%53%▼ 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 59%49%▼ 40%
Clean sheets▲ 32%28%▲ 40%
Goal before half-time• 64%65%▼ 60%
Goal after half-time▲ 95%78%▼ 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.69
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Charleston BatteryYellow cardNathan Igor Messer
  2. Hartford AthleticYellow cardBeverly Makangila
  3. Charleston BatteryYellow cardEmilio Ycaza
  4. Charleston BatteryGoalKirill PakhomovAssist: Jeremy Kelley
  5. Hartford AthleticSubstitutionOn: Thomas John PresthusOff: Britton Fischer
  6. Charleston BatteryYellow cardNathan Igor Messer
  7. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Houssou LandryOff: Andy Cabrera
  8. Hartford AthleticGoalMichee Ngalina
  9. Hartford AthleticYellow cardJordan Scarlett
  10. Hartford AthleticSubstitutionOn: Matthew RealOff: Michee Ngalina
  11. Hartford AthleticGoalBarry CoffeyAssist: Sebastian Anderson
  12. Hartford AthleticYellow cardBaboucarr Njie

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Charleston Battery 3 - 1 - 0 Hartford Athletic. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 75% matches.

Hartford Athletic
1 : 2
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
4 : 2
Hartford Athletic
Hartford Athletic
2 : 2
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
1 : 0
Hartford Athletic

FAQ

What was the result of Charleston Battery vs Hartford Athletic?

The USL Championship match finished Charleston Battery 1:2 Hartford Athletic. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Charleston Battery and Hartford Athletic?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Charleston Battery won 3, Hartford Athletic won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Charleston Battery vs Hartford Athletic?

Charleston Battery score 2.09 goals per game on average and Hartford Athletic 0.90. The USL Championship average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Charleston Battery's matches and 35% of Hartford Athletic's.

What form are Charleston Battery and Hartford Athletic in?

Over the last 5 games Charleston Battery have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Hartford Athletic 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charleston Battery vs Hartford Athletic?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Charleston Battery vs Hartford Athletic: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.