United States - USL ChampionshipMUSC Health StadiumData current as of 17 October 2026

Charleston Battery vs Louisville City: match statistics

Charleston Battery vs Louisville City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Charleston Battery played Louisville City in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: MUSC Health Stadium. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Charleston Battery: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Louisville City: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Charleston Battery scores 2.00 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. Louisville City scores 1.65 and concedes 1.62. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Charleston Battery 46%, Louisville City 69%. Over 2.5: Charleston Battery 58%, Louisville City 58%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Louisville City has higher xG: 1.86 vs 1.57. Charleston Battery: 12.7 shots per match, Louisville City: 15.7.

Match halves

Charleston Battery: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.08. Louisville City: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.92.

Goals by minute

Charleston Battery: 76-90+ (14 goals). Louisville City: 16-30 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-3. Average goals 3.80, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Charleston Battery have won 77% of their home matches, while Louisville City have won 31% of their away fixtures, clearly favouring the hosts. Charleston average 2.77 goals and 7.08 shots on target per match at home, compared with Louisville’s 1.92 goals and 4.62 shots on target away. The defensive gap is just as clear: the hosts concede an average of 0.69 goals at home and keep a clean sheet in 46% of matches, while Louisville concede 2 goals per away match and record clean sheets in 15% of fixtures. Chance quality also favours Charleston, whose average home xG is 1.90, compared with Louisville’s 1.64 away. In their last five matches, the hosts have won 3 times and conceded 4 goals, while the visitors have recorded 2 wins and conceded 5, making a Charleston victory the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes landed in 85% of Louisville City matches and 54% of Charleston Battery fixtures, pointing to a tendency toward both teams scoring. The visitors averaged 1.92 goals per match and had not failed to score, although the hosts conceded an average of just 1.23 goals. Charleston’s chances of finding the net are supported by an average xG of 2.09 and the fact that Louisville conceded an average of 2.00 goals and kept a clean sheet in just 15% of matches. Over their last five games, both teams continued to average at least 1.2 goals, but BTTS landed in 40% of Charleston’s matches and 60% of Louisville’s, so the case for BTTS - Yes is not overwhelming.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Over 1.5 goals landed in 77% of Charleston’s matches and 92% of Louisville’s, giving this line a significantly stronger signal than the higher goal totals. The hosts average 2.09 xG, while the visitors concede 2.00 goals per match, giving Charleston a solid basis for finding the net. Louisville score an average of 1.92 goals and have scored in every match they have played so far, although the hosts’ defence allows just 1.07 xG on average. The projected total of 2.80 goals supports Over 1.5, but the last five matches produced averages of just 2.4 goals for Charleston and 2.2 for Louisville, making Over 2.5 a less certain pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: Charleston went into the break level in 54% of their matches, compared with 46% for Louisville. The hosts also drew the first half in 3 of their last 5 games, reinforcing this scenario. Charleston should gain the upper hand after the break, with an average xG of 2.09 compared with Louisville’s 1.64, while the visitors concede an average of 1.31 goals in second halves. The hosts’ recent form also supports a home win: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored an average of 1.6 goals, while Louisville have won twice and averaged 1.2 goals. The visitors remain dangerous, averaging 1.92 goals per game over the season compared with Charleston’s 1.38, but the combination of frequent half-time draws and the hosts’ advantage in chance creation points to X/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
10Shots11
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
2Shots on target3
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
1.4xG1.35
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
6Corners5
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
86Dangerous attacks61
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
9Fouls5
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
0Cards1
Charleston BatteryLouisville City

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Charleston BatteryLouisville City
2Goals scored / match1.65
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
1.19Goals conceded / match1.62
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
57%Average possession51%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
5.35Shots on target / match5.27
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
Charleston BatteryLouisville City

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.65Shots per match15.65
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
5.35Shots on target5.27
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
15.8%Shot conversion10.6%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
57%Possession51%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
1.57xG for1.86
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
1.27xG against1.3
Charleston BatteryLouisville City

Shooting quality

Charleston Battery: Efficient finishingLouisville City: Attacking
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
Accuracy (shots on target)42%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Charleston Battery is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.2 pts / match - Louisville City

Charleston Battery
WLDWW
Season result split
54% W15% D31% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-4-8
1.77 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-2-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Louisville City
DDLWD
Season result split
38% W27% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-7-9
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Charleston Battery is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1.65 goals / match - Louisville City

Charleston Battery is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.19 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1.62 goals / match - Louisville City

Charleston Battery scoring profile: very strong

Charleston Battery scores in 81% of matches (21 of 26 matches), while Louisville City keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 matches).

Louisville City scoring profile: very strong

Louisville City scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 matches).

52Goals scored (season)43
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
31Goals conceded (season)42
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
3.19Average goals in match3.27
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
8Goals scored (last 5)6
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
Charleston BatteryLouisville City

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal85%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
54%2 goals46%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
27%3 goals23%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
23%4 goals12%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal81%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
38%2 goals54%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
12%3 goals15%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
4%4 goals8%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
Charleston Battery - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 26 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time35%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
4%BTTS in both halves15%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
35%Scored in both halves31%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
40%BTTS - last 580%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charleston Battery is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.69 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.19 pts / match - Louisville City

Charleston Battery - half-time state
42% leading42% draw15% trailing
Louisville City - half-time state
23% leading50% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.69Points per match (1st half)1.19
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
0.92Goals scored (1st half)0.73
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
1.35Average goals (1st half)1.42
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
73%Clean sheet before half-time42%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
50%No goal before half-time50%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.69Points per match (2nd half)1.46
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
1.08Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
1.85Average goals (2nd half)1.85
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
46%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City
35%No goal after half-time35%
Charleston BatteryLouisville City

Charleston Battery - second-half results

50% W19% D31% L
44
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Louisville City - second-half results

38% W31% D31% L
31
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Charleston Battery - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Louisville City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Charleston Battery
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
10
4
16-30
8
3
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
7
61-75
14
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Louisville City
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
10
6
16-30
5
6
31-45
8
11
46-60
8
6
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
119%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Charleston Battery

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Louisville City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Charleston BatteryLigaLouisville City
Average goals in match▲ 3.192.71▲ 3.27
Both teams scored▼ 46%54%▲ 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 58%50%▲ 58%
Clean sheets▲ 35%28%▼ 19%
Goal before half-time▼ 62%66%▲ 73%
Goal after half-time▲ 92%77%▲ 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Louisville CityYellow cardKevon Jamar Lambert
  2. Louisville CitySubstitutionOn: Amadou DiaOff: Jake Morris
  3. Louisville CityGoalJansen Wilson
  4. Louisville CitySubstitutionOn: Ray Serrano LopezOff: Jansen Wilson
  5. Louisville CitySubstitutionOn: Sean TotschOff: Emanuel Perez
  6. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Graham SmithOff: Douglas Francisco Martìnez Juárez
  7. Louisville CityGoalMukwelle Madzey Akale

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Charleston Battery 2 - 0 - 3 Louisville City. Average goals 3.80, both teams scored in 80% matches.

Louisville City
0 : 2
Charleston Battery
Louisville City FC
4 : 1
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
1 : 2
Louisville City FC
Louisville City
3 : 1
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
3 : 2
Louisville City

FAQ

What was the result of Charleston Battery vs Louisville City?

The USL Championship match finished Charleston Battery 0:2 Louisville City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Charleston Battery and Louisville City?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Charleston Battery won 2, Louisville City won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Charleston Battery vs Louisville City?

Charleston Battery score 2.00 goals per game on average and Louisville City 1.65. The USL Championship average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Charleston Battery's matches and 69% of Louisville City's.

What form are Charleston Battery and Louisville City in?

Over the last 5 games Charleston Battery have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Louisville City 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charleston Battery vs Louisville City?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Charleston Battery vs Louisville City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.