United States - USL ChampionshipMUSC Health StadiumData current as of 23 October 2026

Charleston Battery vs Miami FC II: match statistics

Charleston Battery vs Miami FC II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Charleston Battery played Miami FC II in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 24 August 2026. Venue: MUSC Health Stadium. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Charleston Battery: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Miami FC II: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Charleston Battery scores 1.95 and concedes 1.35 goals per match. Miami FC II scores 1.19 and concedes 1.62. League average: 2.69 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Charleston Battery 50%, Miami FC II 52%. Over 2.5: Charleston Battery 60%, Miami FC II 52%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Charleston Battery has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.34. Charleston Battery: 12.5 shots per match, Miami FC II: 11.3.

Match halves

Charleston Battery: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.05. Miami FC II: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Charleston Battery: 76-90+ (10 goals). Miami FC II: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-1. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Charleston Battery are clear favorites: they win 78% of their home matches, remain unbeaten, and score an average of 3.0 goals per game. Miami FC II win just 10% of their away matches, average 0.7 goals, and fail to score in 60% of their outings. The hosts create significantly better chances, recording an average xG of 1.91 compared with the visitors’ 1.21, while also managing 7.11 shots on target per game versus 3.9 for their opponents. Charleston’s defense concedes just 0.78 goals per home match, whereas Miami allow opponents 1.4 goals and an xG of 1.73. In addition, the visitors have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, while Battery are unbeaten in their last nine home outings, strongly supporting a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Charleston Battery records BTTS in 64% of matches, while over their last five games the rate stood at 60%, with an average of 1.8 goals scored. Miami FC II has only a 40% BTTS rate across the season and failed to score in 60% of matches, but their recent run has clearly improved that picture: BTTS landed in 80% of their last five games. The visitors conceded an average of 2.0 goals during this period, while Charleston averages 3.91 shots on target per match and has a 13% conversion rate, making a home goal highly likely. At the same time, Miami have recently created chances worth 1.43 xG per match, compared with 1.35 xG allowed by Charleston, providing grounds to expect an away goal as well. The signal for both teams to score is only moderate due to Miami’s seasonal attacking weakness, but current form and the defensive vulnerability of both sides slightly support the BTTS - Yes option.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Charleston averages 1.64 goals per match, while Miami FC II conceded as many as 2.0 goals per game in their last five fixtures, clearly favoring goals for the home side. The combined xG potential of both teams stands at 2.67, with Miami’s defense allowing an average of 1.73 xG. At least two goals were scored in 82% of Charleston’s matches and 60% of Miami’s games throughout the season, while in their last five matches, the Over 2.5 rate increased to 60% and 80%, respectively. The visitors have recently improved their attacking output to 1.2 goals per match, whereas Charleston conceded 1.2 goals during this period, making Miami’s contribution to the total a realistic prospect. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5, as it requires only two goals with a projected total of 2.75 and is best supported by both season-long statistics and current form.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Charleston win at full-time, as the hosts have been level at the break in 60% of their last five matches, while Miami have been trailing at half-time in as many as 80% of their games over the same period. Charleston average 1.64 goals per match, compared with just 0.70 for Miami, and the difference in form over the last five rounds is even more pronounced: 1.8 goals scored by the hosts versus 1.2 by the visitors, as well as 1.4 points per match compared with 0.2. Miami have lost 50% of their matches this season and have been defeated in four of their last five games, whereas Charleston have won 40% of their last five fixtures. However, the visitors are often cautious before the break, having drawn at half-time in eight of their ten league matches this season, which reduces the likelihood of the hosts taking an early lead. After the interval, Charleston's advantage should increase: they average 0.91 goals in the second half, while Miami fail to score in as many as 80% of second halves. Therefore, the X/1 outcome has the strongest statistical support.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
23Shots2
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
11Shots on target1
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
2.59xG0.39
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
2Corners0
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
51Dangerous attacks25
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
13Fouls16
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
2Cards4
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
1.95Goals scored / match1.19
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
1.35Goals conceded / match1.62
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
57%Average possession49%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
5.15Shots on target / match3.9
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match11.33
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
5.15Shots on target3.9
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
15.6%Shot conversion10.5%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
57%Possession49%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
1.54xG for1.34
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
1.31xG against1.68
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

Shooting quality

Charleston Battery: Efficient finishingMiami FC II: Balanced
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
Accuracy (shots on target)41%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Charleston Battery is 600% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 0.2 pts / match - Miami FC II

Charleston Battery
DLWWL
Season result split
50% W15% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-3-7
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Miami FC II
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W33% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-9
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Charleston Battery is 64% better for: goals scored per match.

1.95 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1.19 goals / match - Miami FC II

Charleston Battery is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.35 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1.62 goals / match - Miami FC II

Charleston Battery scoring profile: very strong

Charleston Battery scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Miami FC II keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 matches).

Miami FC II scoring profile: strong

Miami FC II scores in 57% of matches (12 of 21 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).

39Goals scored (season)25
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
27Goals conceded (season)34
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
3.3Average goals in match2.81
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
9Goals scored (last 5)5
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
6Goals conceded (last 5)10
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal57%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
50%2 goals38%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
30%3 goals14%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
25%4 goals10%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal71%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
40%2 goals57%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
15%3 goals24%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
5%4 goals10%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Charleston Battery - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 20 matches
53%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time33%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
5%BTTS in both halves19%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
35%Scored in both halves33%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
60%BTTS - last 560%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
35%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charleston Battery is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.1 pts / match - Miami FC II

Charleston Battery - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
Miami FC II - half-time state
19% leading52% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)1.1
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.52
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
1.35Average goals (1st half)1.19
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
70%Clean sheet before half-time52%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
55%No goal before half-time52%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.55Points per match (2nd half)1
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
1.05Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
0.9Goals conceded (2nd half)0.95
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
1.95Average goals (2nd half)1.62
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
35%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
35%No goal after half-time57%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

Charleston Battery - second-half results

45% W20% D35% L
32
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Miami FC II - second-half results

19% W43% D38% L
23
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Charleston Battery - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Miami FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Charleston Battery
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
7
4
16-30
6
2
31-45
7
4
46-60
4
6
61-75
10
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Miami FC II
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
3
4
16-30
6
5
31-45
5
5
46-60
3
4
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.06
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Charleston Battery

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Miami FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.85
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Charleston BatteryLigaMiami FC II
Average goals in match▲ 3.302.69▲ 2.81
Both teams scored▼ 50%53%• 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 60%48%▲ 52%
Clean sheets▼ 25%28%• 29%
Goal before half-time▼ 60%65%▼ 62%
Goal after half-time▲ 95%79%▼ 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.69
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Charleston BatteryGoalMaalique Nathanael FosterAssist: Miguel Berry
  2. Charleston BatteryYellow cardLaurent Kissiedou
  3. Charleston BatteryGoalMiguel BerryAssist: Jeremy Kelley
  4. Miami FC IIYellow cardGerald Díaz
  5. Charleston BatteryGoalMiguel BerryAssist: Nathan Igor Messer
  6. Charleston BatteryGoalGraham Smith
  7. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Langston BlackstockOff: Maalique Nathanael Foster
  8. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Alec HughesOff: Jeremy Kelley
  9. Miami FC IISubstitutionOn: Mason TunbridgeOff: Jürgen Locadia
  10. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Chris AllanOff: Nathan Igor Messer
  11. Charleston BatteryYellow cardGraham Smith
  12. Charleston BatteryGoalAlec HughesAssist: Emilio Ycaza
  13. Miami FC IIYellow cardArney David Rocha Marimón

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Charleston Battery 3 - 0 - 1 Miami FC II. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 25% matches.

Charleston Battery
3 : 0
Miami FC II
Miami FC II
1 : 0
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
2 : 0
Miami FC II
Miami FC II
1 : 2
Charleston Battery

FAQ

What was the result of Charleston Battery vs Miami FC II?

The USL Championship match finished Charleston Battery 5:0 Miami FC II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Charleston Battery and Miami FC II?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Charleston Battery won 3, Miami FC II won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Charleston Battery vs Miami FC II?

Charleston Battery score 1.95 goals per game on average and Miami FC II 1.19. The USL Championship average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Charleston Battery's matches and 52% of Miami FC II's.

What form are Charleston Battery and Miami FC II in?

Over the last 5 games Charleston Battery have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Miami FC II 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charleston Battery vs Miami FC II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Charleston Battery vs Miami FC II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.