United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 08 September 2026

Charleston Battery vs Miami FC II: match statistics

Charleston Battery vs Miami FC II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Charleston Battery played Miami FC II in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 24 August 2026. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Charleston Battery: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Miami FC II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Charleston Battery scores 1.94 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Miami FC II scores 1.25 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Charleston Battery 50%, Miami FC II 50%. Over 2.5: Charleston Battery 56%, Miami FC II 50%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Charleston Battery has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.34. Charleston Battery: 13.1 shots per match, Miami FC II: 11.3.

Match halves

Charleston Battery: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.00. Miami FC II: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Charleston Battery: 76-90+ (8 goals). Miami FC II: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-1. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Charleston Battery are clear favorites: they win 78% of their home matches, remain unbeaten, and score an average of 3.0 goals per game. Miami FC II win just 10% of their away matches, average 0.7 goals, and fail to score in 60% of their outings. The hosts create significantly better chances, recording an average xG of 1.91 compared with the visitors’ 1.21, while also managing 7.11 shots on target per game versus 3.9 for their opponents. Charleston’s defense concedes just 0.78 goals per home match, whereas Miami allow opponents 1.4 goals and an xG of 1.73. In addition, the visitors have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, while Battery are unbeaten in their last nine home outings, strongly supporting a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Charleston Battery records BTTS in 64% of matches, while over their last five games the rate stood at 60%, with an average of 1.8 goals scored. Miami FC II has only a 40% BTTS rate across the season and failed to score in 60% of matches, but their recent run has clearly improved that picture: BTTS landed in 80% of their last five games. The visitors conceded an average of 2.0 goals during this period, while Charleston averages 3.91 shots on target per match and has a 13% conversion rate, making a home goal highly likely. At the same time, Miami have recently created chances worth 1.43 xG per match, compared with 1.35 xG allowed by Charleston, providing grounds to expect an away goal as well. The signal for both teams to score is only moderate due to Miami’s seasonal attacking weakness, but current form and the defensive vulnerability of both sides slightly support the BTTS - Yes option.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Charleston averages 1.64 goals per match, while Miami FC II conceded as many as 2.0 goals per game in their last five fixtures, clearly favoring goals for the home side. The combined xG potential of both teams stands at 2.67, with Miami’s defense allowing an average of 1.73 xG. At least two goals were scored in 82% of Charleston’s matches and 60% of Miami’s games throughout the season, while in their last five matches, the Over 2.5 rate increased to 60% and 80%, respectively. The visitors have recently improved their attacking output to 1.2 goals per match, whereas Charleston conceded 1.2 goals during this period, making Miami’s contribution to the total a realistic prospect. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5, as it requires only two goals with a projected total of 2.75 and is best supported by both season-long statistics and current form.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Charleston win at full-time, as the hosts have been level at the break in 60% of their last five matches, while Miami have been trailing at half-time in as many as 80% of their games over the same period. Charleston average 1.64 goals per match, compared with just 0.70 for Miami, and the difference in form over the last five rounds is even more pronounced: 1.8 goals scored by the hosts versus 1.2 by the visitors, as well as 1.4 points per match compared with 0.2. Miami have lost 50% of their matches this season and have been defeated in four of their last five games, whereas Charleston have won 40% of their last five fixtures. However, the visitors are often cautious before the break, having drawn at half-time in eight of their ten league matches this season, which reduces the likelihood of the hosts taking an early lead. After the interval, Charleston's advantage should increase: they average 0.91 goals in the second half, while Miami fail to score in as many as 80% of second halves. Therefore, the X/1 outcome has the strongest statistical support.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
-1Shots-1
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
-1Shots on target-1
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
0xG0
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
-1Corners-1
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
0Dangerous attacks0
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
-1Fouls-1
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
-1Cards-1
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
1.94Goals scored / match1.25
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
1.38Goals conceded / match1.5
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
56%Average possession48%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
5.44Shots on target / match4.06
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.06Shots per match11.25
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
5.44Shots on target4.06
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
14.8%Shot conversion11.1%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
56%Possession48%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
1.61xG for1.34
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
1.27xG against1.71
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

Shooting quality

Charleston Battery: Efficient finishingMiami FC II: Balanced
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
Accuracy (shots on target)42%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Charleston Battery is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1 pts / match - Miami FC II

Charleston Battery
WWWLD
Season result split
50% W19% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-5
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Miami FC II
LDLDW
Season result split
31% W38% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-5
1.31 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-3
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Charleston Battery is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

1.94 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1.25 goals / match - Miami FC II

Charleston Battery is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1.5 goals / match - Miami FC II

Charleston Battery scoring profile: strong

Charleston Battery scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Miami FC II keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).

Miami FC II scoring profile: strong

Miami FC II scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

31Goals scored (season)20
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
22Goals conceded (season)24
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
3.31Average goals in match2.75
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
15Goals scored (last 5)5
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal56%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
56%2 goals38%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
31%3 goals19%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
25%4 goals13%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal63%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
38%2 goals50%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
13%3 goals25%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
6%4 goals13%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Charleston Battery - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 16 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time31%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
6%BTTS in both halves19%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
38%Scored in both halves38%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
80%BTTS - last 540%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charleston Battery is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.69 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.31 pts / match - Miami FC II

Charleston Battery - half-time state
44% leading38% draw19% trailing
Miami FC II - half-time state
25% leading56% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.69Points per match (1st half)1.31
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
0.94Goals scored (1st half)0.56
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.13
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
69%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
56%No goal before half-time50%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)1
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
1.94Average goals (2nd half)1.63
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
31%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II
38%No goal after half-time56%
Charleston BatteryMiami FC II

Charleston Battery - second-half results

44% W25% R31% P
27
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Miami FC II - second-half results

19% W44% R38% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Charleston Battery - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match1.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+6+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8
Miami FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Charleston Battery
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Miami FC II
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
4
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
39%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Charleston Battery

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Miami FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Charleston BatteryLigaMiami FC II
Average goals in match 3.312.79 2.75
Both teams scored 50%58% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%52% 50%
Clean sheets 19%26% 38%
Goal before half-time 63%67% 56%
Goal after half-time 94%80% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Charleston BatteryGoalMaalique Nathanael FosterAssist: Miguel Berry
  2. Charleston BatteryYellow cardLaurent Kissiedou
  3. Charleston BatteryGoalMiguel BerryAssist: Jeremy Kelley
  4. Miami FC IIYellow cardGerald Díaz
  5. Charleston BatteryGoalMiguel BerryAssist: Nathan Igor Messer
  6. Charleston BatteryGoalGraham Smith
  7. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Langston BlackstockOff: Maalique Nathanael Foster
  8. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Alec HughesOff: Jeremy Kelley
  9. Miami FC IISubstitutionOn: Mason TunbridgeOff: Jürgen Locadia
  10. Charleston BatterySubstitutionOn: Chris AllanOff: Nathan Igor Messer
  11. Charleston BatteryYellow cardGraham Smith
  12. Charleston BatteryGoalAlec HughesAssist: Emilio Ycaza
  13. Miami FC IIYellow cardArney David Rocha Marimón

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Charleston Battery 3 - 0 - 1 Miami FC II. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 25% matches.

Charleston Battery
3 : 0
Miami FC II
Miami FC II
1 : 0
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
2 : 0
Miami FC II
Miami FC II
1 : 2
Charleston Battery

FAQ

What was the result of Charleston Battery vs Miami FC II?

The USL Championship match finished Charleston Battery 5:0 Miami FC II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Charleston Battery and Miami FC II?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Charleston Battery won 3, Miami FC II won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Charleston Battery vs Miami FC II?

Charleston Battery score 1.94 goals per game on average and Miami FC II 1.25. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Charleston Battery's matches and 50% of Miami FC II's.

What form are Charleston Battery and Miami FC II in?

Over the last 5 games Charleston Battery have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Miami FC II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charleston Battery vs Miami FC II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Charleston Battery vs Miami FC II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.