United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 24 July 2026

Charleston Battery vs Tampa Bay Rowdies: match statistics

Charleston Battery vs Tampa Bay Rowdies: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Charleston Battery play Tampa Bay Rowdies in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 21:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Charleston Battery: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Tampa Bay Rowdies: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Charleston Battery scores 1.94 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Tampa Bay Rowdies scores 1.56 and concedes 0.81. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Charleston Battery 50%, Tampa Bay Rowdies 44%. Over 2.5: Charleston Battery 56%, Tampa Bay Rowdies 38%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Tampa Bay Rowdies has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.61. Charleston Battery: 13.1 shots per match, Tampa Bay Rowdies: 16.0.

Match halves

Charleston Battery: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.00. Tampa Bay Rowdies: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Charleston Battery: 76-90+ (8 goals). Tampa Bay Rowdies: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 4-1-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Tampa Bay Rowdies are the favorites in this matchup primarily due to their standing and form: they sit 3rd versus Charleston’s 8th and have 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 matches, averaging 2.6 points per game versus the hosts’ 1.2. The visitors have scored 10 goals this season while conceding only 3, whereas Charleston’s record is 7 scored and 7 conceded with an average of 1.5 goals conceded at home. Charleston, however, possess a strong home attack — averaging 2.5 goals, xG 2.76 and 8.5 shots on target per match — and a conversion rate of 14% versus Rowdies’ 6% on the road. Rowdies’ key advantage is their defense: 100% clean sheets away and an average of 0 goals conceded per away match (xG against 0.93), delivering defensive stability. Based on this, I project an away victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
12Shots11
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
4Shots on target3
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
1.5xG1.2
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
6Corners5
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
63Dangerous attacks41
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
12Fouls11
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
2Cards4
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
1.94Goals scored / match1.56
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
1.38Goals conceded / match0.81
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
56%Average possession54%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
5.44Shots on target / match4.63
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.06Shots per match16
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
5.44Shots on target4.63
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
14.8%Shot conversion9.8%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
56%Possession54%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
1.61xG for1.77
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
1.27xG against1.14
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies

Shooting quality

Charleston Battery: Efficient finishingTampa Bay Rowdies: Attacking
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
Accuracy (shots on target)42%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Charleston Battery is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies

Charleston Battery
WWWLD
Season result split
50% W19% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-5
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Tampa Bay Rowdies
DLWLD
Season result split
56% W31% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-2
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-0
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.08Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Charleston Battery is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

1.94 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1.56 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 70% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 0.81 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies

Charleston Battery scoring profile: mixed

Charleston Battery scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Tampa Bay Rowdies keeps a clean sheet in 50% (8 of 16 matches).

Tampa Bay Rowdies scoring profile: very strong

Tampa Bay Rowdies scores in 94% of matches (15 of 16 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

31Goals scored (season)25
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
22Goals conceded (season)13
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
3.31Average goals in match2.38
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
15Goals scored (last 5)6
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal94%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
56%2 goals44%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
31%3 goals19%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
25%4 goals0%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal50%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
38%2 goals19%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
13%3 goals6%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
6%4 goals6%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Charleston Battery - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 16 matches
44%
Tampa Bay Rowdies - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 16 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time6%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
6%BTTS in both halves0%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
38%Scored in both halves19%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
80%BTTS - last 560%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.69 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 2 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies

Charleston Battery - half-time state
44% leading38% draw19% trailing
Tampa Bay Rowdies - half-time state
56% leading31% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.69Points per match (1st half)2
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
0.94Goals scored (1st half)0.81
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.31
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.13
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
69%Clean sheet before half-time81%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
56%No goal before half-time44%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
1.94Average goals (2nd half)1.25
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
31%Clean sheet after half-time56%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies
38%No goal after half-time44%
Charleston BatteryTampa Bay Rowdies

Charleston Battery - second-half results

44% W25% R31% P
27
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tampa Bay Rowdies - second-half results

38% W38% R25% P
32
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Charleston Battery - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match1.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+6+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8
Tampa Bay Rowdies - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Charleston Battery
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Tampa Bay Rowdies
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
1
16-30
4
1
31-45
3
3
46-60
0
0
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Charleston Battery

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Tampa Bay Rowdies

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Charleston BatteryLigaTampa Bay Rowdies
Average goals in match 3.312.79 2.38
Both teams scored 50%58% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%52% 38%
Clean sheets 19%26% 50%
Goal before half-time 63%67% 69%
Goal after half-time 94%80% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Charleston Battery 4 - 1 - 1 Tampa Bay Rowdies. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Tampa Bay Rowdies
2 : 2
Charleston Battery
Tampa Bay Rowdies
1 : 3
Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery
2 : 1
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Charleston Battery
2 : 1
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Charleston Battery
3 : 1
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Tampa Bay Rowdies
4 : 2
Charleston Battery

FAQ

What was the result of Charleston Battery vs Tampa Bay Rowdies?

The USL Championship match finished Charleston Battery 1:1 Tampa Bay Rowdies. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Charleston Battery and Tampa Bay Rowdies?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Charleston Battery won 4, Tampa Bay Rowdies won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Charleston Battery vs Tampa Bay Rowdies?

Charleston Battery score 1.94 goals per game on average and Tampa Bay Rowdies 1.56. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Charleston Battery's matches and 44% of Tampa Bay Rowdies's.

What form are Charleston Battery and Tampa Bay Rowdies in?

Over the last 5 games Charleston Battery have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Tampa Bay Rowdies 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charleston Battery vs Tampa Bay Rowdies?

The statistical background for Charleston Battery vs Tampa Bay Rowdies — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.