Charleston Battery vs Tulsa Roughnecks: match statistics
Charleston Battery vs Tulsa Roughnecks: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Charleston Battery play Tulsa Roughnecks in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 14 June 2026 at 01:30. Venue: MUSC Health Stadium. Final score: 5:1.
Current form
Charleston Battery: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Tulsa Roughnecks: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Charleston Battery scores 1.94 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.29 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Charleston Battery 50%, Tulsa Roughnecks 50%. Over 2.5: Charleston Battery 56%, Tulsa Roughnecks 36%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Charleston Battery has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.29. Charleston Battery: 13.1 shots per match, Tulsa Roughnecks: 10.9.
Match halves
Charleston Battery: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.00. Tulsa Roughnecks: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.79.
Goals by minute
Charleston Battery: 76-90+ (8 goals). Tulsa Roughnecks: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Charleston Battery has a clear home advantage: they average 2.4 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.88, registering 14.6 shots per game of which 6.8 are on target, while Tulsa averages 1.4 goals away with xG 1.37 and 11.6 shots, 4.2 on target. The hosts concede 0.8 goals on average at home and keep 40% clean sheets, and additionally have 0% of home matches without scoring; the visitors concede 1.0 goals on average away and have 40% of away games without scoring. Charleston converts chances more efficiently (16% shot conversion vs 12% for Tulsa) and maintains greater possession (57% vs 45%), translating into superior chance quality (xG For 1.88 vs 1.37 and xG Against 1.03 vs 1.19). Tulsa, however, has better short-term form: 3 wins in the last 5 matches and an average of 2.0 points in that period versus Charleston’s 2 wins and 1.6 points, so the visitors can be dangerous on the counter. Considering the hosts’ statistical dominance in attack at home and stronger defense, I tip a Charleston win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Charleston Battery | Tulsa Roughnecks | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Charleston Battery is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.4 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Charleston Battery is 50% better for: goals scored per match.
1.94 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1.29 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks
Tulsa Roughnecks is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.38 goals / match - Charleston Battery · 1.14 goals / match - Tulsa Roughnecks
Charleston Battery scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Charleston Battery
Over / Under — Tulsa Roughnecks
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Charleston Battery is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.69 pts / match - Charleston Battery · 1.5 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Charleston Battery - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Charleston Battery
Tulsa Roughnecks
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Charleston Battery | Liga | Tulsa Roughnecks | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.31 | 2.79 | ▼ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 52% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 26% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 67% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 94% | 80% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Charleston Battery 1 - 0 - 0 Tulsa Roughnecks. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Charleston Battery vs Tulsa Roughnecks?
The USL Championship match finished Charleston Battery 5:1 Tulsa Roughnecks. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Charleston Battery vs Tulsa Roughnecks?
Charleston Battery score 1.94 goals per game on average and Tulsa Roughnecks 1.29. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Charleston Battery's matches and 50% of Tulsa Roughnecks's.
What form are Charleston Battery and Tulsa Roughnecks in?
Over the last 5 games Charleston Battery have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Tulsa Roughnecks 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charleston Battery vs Tulsa Roughnecks?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.