Charlotte vs FC Cincinnati: match statistics
Charlotte vs FC Cincinnati: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Charlotte played FC Cincinnati in MLS (United States). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Charlotte: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. FC Cincinnati: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Charlotte scores 1.64 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. FC Cincinnati scores 2.00 and concedes 2.27. League average: 3.20 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Charlotte 73%, FC Cincinnati 64%. Over 2.5: Charlotte 73%, FC Cincinnati 55%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
FC Cincinnati has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.32. Charlotte: 10.8 shots per match, FC Cincinnati: 13.8.
Match halves
Charlotte: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 1.18. FC Cincinnati: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 1.18.
Goals by minute
Charlotte: 76-90+ (6 goals). FC Cincinnati: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Charlotte to win (1): at home the team averages 2.4 goals per match and wins 60% of home games, giving them a clear offensive edge. FC Cincinnati average 1.83 goals scored on the road but concede as many as 3.0 goals per match and have an away xG against of 2.07, indicating significant defensive fragility away from home. Charlotte creates more high-quality chances: 6.8 shots on target and 13.6 shots per match with an 18% conversion rate, versus the visitors' 5.5 shots on target, 12.33 attempts and 15% conversion. Forms are mixed — at home Charlotte’s last 5 home matches read 'wdwwl' (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), although overall their last 5 are 1 win and 4 losses; Cincinnati’s last 5 are 2 wins and 3 draws with an average of 1.8 points per match, but 0% clean sheets on the road. Considering also the average xG (Charlotte 1.6 at home vs Cincinnati 1.44 away) and superior conversion, I estimate the probability of a home win at around 60%, draw 25% and away win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I tip BTTS - Yes because FC Cincinnati has a seasonal BTTS rate of 83% (80% in the last 5), while Charlotte has 40% for the season and 60% in the last 5 — the 5-match average for both teams is 70%, which strongly favors both teams scoring. Both sides have been conceding heavily: Charlotte conceded 12 goals in the last 5 matches (2.4 per match), and Cincinnati conceded 10 in the last 5 (2.0 per match); seasonally Cincinnati concedes as many as 3.0 goals per match and has 0% clean sheets, increasing the likelihood both will find the net. Offensively Cincinnati is in form (13 goals in the last 5, avg 2.6), and Charlotte has a season rate of 2.2 goals per match despite a drop in form over the last 5 (1.0), so both sides have goal-scoring potential. xG and shot metrics confirm this: xG_for is 1.63 for Charlotte and 1.44 for Cincinnati, while xG_against is 1.63 (Charlotte) vs 2.07 (Cincinnati), and shots on target are similar at 5.4 vs 5.5. Considering Cincinnati’s 83% BTTS, the high goals conceded figures (12 and 10 in the last 5), comparable shots on target, and both teams’ clear tendency to be involved in goal-heavy matches, I assign BTTS - Yes probability 76% and No 24%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have high goal potential: Charlotte scores an average of 2.2 goals per game with xG 1.63, while FC Cincinnati records 1.83 goals with xG 1.44 and concedes an average of 3.0 goals as an away side. The average of the home xG (1.63) and Cincinnati’s xG conceded (2.07) gives ~1.85 expected goals for Charlotte, and the average of the away xG (1.44) and the home xG conceded (1.63) gives ~1.53 for FC Cincinnati, totaling 3.38 expected goals. Seasonal rates show Over 1.5 occurs in 80% of Charlotte’s matches and 83% of Cincinnati’s; additionally, Cincinnati has 0% clean sheets away and the percentage of away matches with Both Teams to Score is 83%, all strongly supporting Over 1.5. Over 2.5 has smaller but meaningful backing (40% for the home side, 67% for the away side and a league average of 3.18 goals), whereas Over 3.5 is less certain since the predicted 3.38 goals is slightly below the 3.5 threshold. Therefore the best and safest line is Over 1.5, based on high seasonal percentages (>80%) and a combined xG of 3.38.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back X/1 (Half-Time draw, Charlotte win) because the hosts have a clear seasonal advantage: an average of 2.0 points per home match and a 60% home win rate versus 0.83 points and 17% wins for FC Cincinnati. Draws at the break are common — Charlotte were level at half-time in 40% of matches and Cincinnati in 67%, with half-time goals averages of 0.8 for the hosts and 0.83 for the visitors. Charlotte have a higher xG (1.63 vs. 1.44) and score on average 1.4 goals in the second half, which suggests they more often take the initiative after the interval. Cincinnati concede an average of 3.0 goals per match and have an xG against of 2.07, and they concede 1.33 goals on average before half-time, so when the score is level at the break they are more exposed to conceding after the restart. On that basis I assigned the X/1 scenario the highest probability of 33%, with 1/1 second at 20% due to Charlotte’s strong home efficiency.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Charlotte | FC Cincinnati | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FC Cincinnati is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Charlotte · 1.8 pts / match - FC Cincinnati
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FC Cincinnati is 22% better for: goals scored per match.
1.64 goals / match - Charlotte · 2 goals / match - FC Cincinnati
Charlotte is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.73 goals / match - Charlotte · 2.27 goals / match - FC Cincinnati
Charlotte scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).
FC Cincinnati scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Charlotte keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Charlotte
Over / Under - FC Cincinnati
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Charlotte is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.09 pts / match - Charlotte · 0.82 pts / match - FC Cincinnati
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Charlotte - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
FC Cincinnati - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Charlotte
FC Cincinnati
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Charlotte | Liga | FC Cincinnati | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.36 | 3.20 | ▲ 4.27 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 73% | 58% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 73% | 60% | ▼ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 9% | 24% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 73% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 78% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Charlotte vs FC Cincinnati?
The MLS match finished Charlotte 2:2 FC Cincinnati. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Charlotte vs FC Cincinnati?
Charlotte score 1.64 goals per game on average and FC Cincinnati 2.00. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Charlotte's matches and 64% of FC Cincinnati's.
What form are Charlotte and FC Cincinnati in?
Over the last 5 games Charlotte have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and FC Cincinnati 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charlotte vs FC Cincinnati?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


