United States - MLSData current as of 07 September 2026

Charlotte vs FC Cincinnati: match statistics

Charlotte crest
Charlotte
2 : 2half-time 0:2
FC Cincinnati crest
FC Cincinnati

Charlotte vs FC Cincinnati: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Charlotte played FC Cincinnati in MLS (United States). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Charlotte: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. FC Cincinnati: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Charlotte scores 1.64 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. FC Cincinnati scores 2.00 and concedes 2.27. League average: 3.20 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Charlotte 73%, FC Cincinnati 64%. Over 2.5: Charlotte 73%, FC Cincinnati 55%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

FC Cincinnati has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.32. Charlotte: 10.8 shots per match, FC Cincinnati: 13.8.

Match halves

Charlotte: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 1.18. FC Cincinnati: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 1.18.

Goals by minute

Charlotte: 76-90+ (6 goals). FC Cincinnati: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back Charlotte to win (1): at home the team averages 2.4 goals per match and wins 60% of home games, giving them a clear offensive edge. FC Cincinnati average 1.83 goals scored on the road but concede as many as 3.0 goals per match and have an away xG against of 2.07, indicating significant defensive fragility away from home. Charlotte creates more high-quality chances: 6.8 shots on target and 13.6 shots per match with an 18% conversion rate, versus the visitors' 5.5 shots on target, 12.33 attempts and 15% conversion. Forms are mixed — at home Charlotte’s last 5 home matches read 'wdwwl' (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), although overall their last 5 are 1 win and 4 losses; Cincinnati’s last 5 are 2 wins and 3 draws with an average of 1.8 points per match, but 0% clean sheets on the road. Considering also the average xG (Charlotte 1.6 at home vs Cincinnati 1.44 away) and superior conversion, I estimate the probability of a home win at around 60%, draw 25% and away win 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I tip BTTS - Yes because FC Cincinnati has a seasonal BTTS rate of 83% (80% in the last 5), while Charlotte has 40% for the season and 60% in the last 5 — the 5-match average for both teams is 70%, which strongly favors both teams scoring. Both sides have been conceding heavily: Charlotte conceded 12 goals in the last 5 matches (2.4 per match), and Cincinnati conceded 10 in the last 5 (2.0 per match); seasonally Cincinnati concedes as many as 3.0 goals per match and has 0% clean sheets, increasing the likelihood both will find the net. Offensively Cincinnati is in form (13 goals in the last 5, avg 2.6), and Charlotte has a season rate of 2.2 goals per match despite a drop in form over the last 5 (1.0), so both sides have goal-scoring potential. xG and shot metrics confirm this: xG_for is 1.63 for Charlotte and 1.44 for Cincinnati, while xG_against is 1.63 (Charlotte) vs 2.07 (Cincinnati), and shots on target are similar at 5.4 vs 5.5. Considering Cincinnati’s 83% BTTS, the high goals conceded figures (12 and 10 in the last 5), comparable shots on target, and both teams’ clear tendency to be involved in goal-heavy matches, I assign BTTS - Yes probability 76% and No 24%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have high goal potential: Charlotte scores an average of 2.2 goals per game with xG 1.63, while FC Cincinnati records 1.83 goals with xG 1.44 and concedes an average of 3.0 goals as an away side. The average of the home xG (1.63) and Cincinnati’s xG conceded (2.07) gives ~1.85 expected goals for Charlotte, and the average of the away xG (1.44) and the home xG conceded (1.63) gives ~1.53 for FC Cincinnati, totaling 3.38 expected goals. Seasonal rates show Over 1.5 occurs in 80% of Charlotte’s matches and 83% of Cincinnati’s; additionally, Cincinnati has 0% clean sheets away and the percentage of away matches with Both Teams to Score is 83%, all strongly supporting Over 1.5. Over 2.5 has smaller but meaningful backing (40% for the home side, 67% for the away side and a league average of 3.18 goals), whereas Over 3.5 is less certain since the predicted 3.38 goals is slightly below the 3.5 threshold. Therefore the best and safest line is Over 1.5, based on high seasonal percentages (>80%) and a combined xG of 3.38.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back X/1 (Half-Time draw, Charlotte win) because the hosts have a clear seasonal advantage: an average of 2.0 points per home match and a 60% home win rate versus 0.83 points and 17% wins for FC Cincinnati. Draws at the break are common — Charlotte were level at half-time in 40% of matches and Cincinnati in 67%, with half-time goals averages of 0.8 for the hosts and 0.83 for the visitors. Charlotte have a higher xG (1.63 vs. 1.44) and score on average 1.4 goals in the second half, which suggests they more often take the initiative after the interval. Cincinnati concede an average of 3.0 goals per match and have an xG against of 2.07, and they concede 1.33 goals on average before half-time, so when the score is level at the break they are more exposed to conceding after the restart. On that basis I assigned the X/1 scenario the highest probability of 33%, with 1/1 second at 20% due to Charlotte’s strong home efficiency.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
12Shots13
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
3Shots on target5
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
1.34xG1.39
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
7Corners4
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
52Dangerous attacks29
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
9Fouls15
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
1Cards4
CharlotteFC Cincinnati

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CharlotteFC Cincinnati
1.64Goals scored / match2
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
1.73Goals conceded / match2.27
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
48%Average possession50%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
4.91Shots on target / match5.45
CharlotteFC Cincinnati

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.82Shots per match13.82
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
4.91Shots on target5.45
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
15.1%Shot conversion14.5%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
48%Possession50%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
1.32xG for1.53
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
1.63xG against1.87
CharlotteFC Cincinnati

Shooting quality

Charlotte: Efficient finishingFC Cincinnati: Efficient finishing
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
Accuracy (shots on target)45%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FC Cincinnati is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Charlotte · 1.8 pts / match - FC Cincinnati

Charlotte
LWLLL
Season result split
36% W18% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-5
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
FC Cincinnati
DDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
36% W27% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-4
1.36 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 2.13BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cincinnati is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

1.64 goals / match - Charlotte · 2 goals / match - FC Cincinnati

Charlotte is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.73 goals / match - Charlotte · 2.27 goals / match - FC Cincinnati

Charlotte scoring profile: very strong

Charlotte scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Charlotte keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).

18Goals scored (season)22
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
19Goals conceded (season)25
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
3.36Average goals in match4.27
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
6Goals scored (last 5)13
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
12Goals conceded (last 5)10
CharlotteFC Cincinnati

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal82%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
45%2 goals64%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
18%3 goals36%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
9%4 goals18%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal82%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
36%2 goals55%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
27%3 goals45%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
18%4 goals27%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time55%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
9%BTTS in both halves36%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
36%Scored in both halves45%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati

BTTS and goal count

64%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
80%BTTS - last 580%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time64%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time45%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
73%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
36%Min. 3 goals after half-time45%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charlotte is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / match - Charlotte · 0.82 pts / match - FC Cincinnati

Charlotte - half-time state
18% leading55% draw27% trailing
FC Cincinnati - half-time state
9% leading55% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per match (1st half)0.82
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.82
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
0.73Goals conceded (1st half)1.09
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
1.18Average goals (1st half)1.91
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
55%Clean sheet before half-time45%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
55%No goal before half-time36%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per match (2nd half)1.55
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
1.18Goals scored (2nd half)1.18
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.18
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
2.18Average goals (2nd half)2.36
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
27%Clean sheet after half-time27%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati
36%No goal after half-time36%
CharlotteFC Cincinnati

Charlotte - second-half results

27% W45% R27% P
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

45% W18% R36% P
9
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding400%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Charlotte - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.6
Average goals in match1.22.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
FC Cincinnati - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.20
Goals scored / match1.21.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match2.42.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Charlotte
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
2
1
31-45
3
3
46-60
4
3
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
3
5
16-30
6
5
31-45
1
4
46-60
2
3
61-75
10
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
119%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Charlotte

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.67
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
156%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

CharlotteLigaFC Cincinnati
Average goals in match 3.363.20 4.27
Both teams scored 73%58% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%60% 55%
Clean sheets 9%24% 18%
Goal before half-time 64%73% 64%
Goal after half-time 82%78% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.20
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.28
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC CincinnatiYellow cardGerardo Valenzuela
  2. FC CincinnatiGoalAhoueke Denkey
  3. FC CincinnatiGoalEvander da Silva FerreiraAssist: Pavel Bucha
  4. CharlotteGoalIdan GurnoAssist: Timothy Michael Ream
  5. CharlotteGoalPep Biel Mas JaumeAssist: Djibril Diani
  6. CharlotteYellow cardAshley Westwood
  7. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Miles RobinsonOff: Matt Miazga
  8. FC CincinnatiYellow cardSamuel Gidi
  9. FC CincinnatiYellow cardEvander da Silva Ferreira
  10. CharlotteSubstitutionOn: Liel AbadaOff: Kerwin Calderón Vargas
  11. CharlotteSubstitutionOn: Archie Stuart GoodwinOff: Idan Gurno
  12. FC CincinnatiYellow cardObinna Nwobodo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Ismail ElfathMatches officiated: 9
4.56Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 222%Home wins22%Draws56%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Charlotte vs FC Cincinnati?

The MLS match finished Charlotte 2:2 FC Cincinnati. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Charlotte vs FC Cincinnati?

Charlotte score 1.64 goals per game on average and FC Cincinnati 2.00. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Charlotte's matches and 64% of FC Cincinnati's.

What form are Charlotte and FC Cincinnati in?

Over the last 5 games Charlotte have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and FC Cincinnati 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charlotte vs FC Cincinnati?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.