Charlotte vs FC Cincinnati: match statistics
Charlotte vs FC Cincinnati: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Charlotte play FC Cincinnati in MLS (United States). The match date is 10 May 2026 at 01:30. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Charlotte: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. FC Cincinnati: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Charlotte scores 1.60 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. FC Cincinnati scores 2.50 and concedes 2.50. League average: 3.31 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Charlotte 67%, FC Cincinnati 75%. Over 2.5: Charlotte 67%, FC Cincinnati 69%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.
xG, shots and style
FC Cincinnati has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.34. Charlotte: 11.1 shots per match, FC Cincinnati: 13.4.
Match halves
Charlotte: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.07. FC Cincinnati: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.38.
Goals by minute
Charlotte: 76-90+ (7 goals). FC Cincinnati: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS: 3.31 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
I back Charlotte to win (1): at home the team averages 2.4 goals per match and wins 60% of home games, giving them a clear offensive edge. FC Cincinnati average 1.83 goals scored on the road but concede as many as 3.0 goals per match and have an away xG against of 2.07, indicating significant defensive fragility away from home. Charlotte creates more high-quality chances: 6.8 shots on target and 13.6 shots per match with an 18% conversion rate, versus the visitors' 5.5 shots on target, 12.33 attempts and 15% conversion. Forms are mixed — at home Charlotte’s last 5 home matches read 'wdwwl' (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), although overall their last 5 are 1 win and 4 losses; Cincinnati’s last 5 are 2 wins and 3 draws with an average of 1.8 points per match, but 0% clean sheets on the road. Considering also the average xG (Charlotte 1.6 at home vs Cincinnati 1.44 away) and superior conversion, I estimate the probability of a home win at around 60%, draw 25% and away win 15%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Charlotte | FC Cincinnati | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FC Cincinnati is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Charlotte · 1.6 pts / match - FC Cincinnati
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FC Cincinnati is 56% better for: goals scored per match.
1.6 goals / match - Charlotte · 2.5 goals / match - FC Cincinnati
Charlotte is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.53 goals / match - Charlotte · 2.5 goals / match - FC Cincinnati
Charlotte scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).
FC Cincinnati scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Charlotte keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Charlotte
Over / Under — FC Cincinnati
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Charlotte - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
FC Cincinnati - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.8 | 3.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Charlotte
FC Cincinnati
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Charlotte | Liga | FC Cincinnati | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.13 | 3.31 | ▲ 5.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 61% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 63% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 22% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 73% | 77% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 80% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Charlotte vs FC Cincinnati?
The MLS match finished Charlotte 2:2 FC Cincinnati. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Charlotte vs FC Cincinnati?
Charlotte score 1.60 goals per game on average and FC Cincinnati 2.50. The MLS average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Charlotte's matches and 75% of FC Cincinnati's.
What form are Charlotte and FC Cincinnati in?
Over the last 5 games Charlotte have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and FC Cincinnati 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charlotte vs FC Cincinnati?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.