United States - MLSData current as of 13 September 2026

Charlotte vs Philadelphia Union: match statistics

Charlotte crest
Charlotte
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Philadelphia Union crest
Philadelphia Union

Charlotte vs Philadelphia Union: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Charlotte played Philadelphia Union in MLS (United States). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Charlotte: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Philadelphia Union: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Charlotte scores 2.00 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Philadelphia Union scores 0.60 and concedes 1.80. League average: 3.06 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Charlotte 60%, Philadelphia Union 60%. Over 2.5: Charlotte 60%, Philadelphia Union 60%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Philadelphia Union has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.47. Charlotte: 12.6 shots per match, Philadelphia Union: 13.4.

Match halves

Charlotte: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.60. Philadelphia Union: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Charlotte: 61-75 (3 goals). Philadelphia Union: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.06 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The statistics strongly favor Charlotte: the hosts score an average of 3.0 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.88, whereas Philadelphia averages only 0.5 goals away with an xG of 1.5. Charlotte concedes an average of 0.67 goals at their stadium, while the visitors concede 2.0 goals on the road and have a 100% loss rate in away matches. In the last 5 fixtures Charlotte has scored 10 goals and averaged 1.6 points per game, whereas Philadelphia has scored 3 goals, lost 4 of 5 and averages just 0.2 points per game. The gap in quality of chances is significant: the hosts average 8.67 shots on target and 17 attempts per home match with a conversion rate of 18%, while the visitors manage only 3 shots on target and 13 attempts with a 4% conversion and 50% of away games without a goal. Considering the superiority in finishing (3.0 vs 0.5 goals), the better number of clear-cut chances (8.67 SOT vs 3) and the visitors’ poor form and defense (0.2 PPG and 100% away losses), I tip the hosts to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have season BTTS rates of 67% (Charlotte) and 50% (Philadelphia), and BTTS in the last 5 matches was 60% for both sides, indicating a mutual-goals tendency. Charlotte averages 0.67 goals scored and 1.67 conceded per game, while Philadelphia averages 0.5 scored and 2.0 conceded, so both teams regularly allow opposition goals. In terms of chance creation both sides generate xG of 1.6 (Charlotte) and 1.5 (Philadelphia), with averages of 13.67 and 13.0 shots and 3.67 and 3.0 shots on target, and conversion rates around 5% and 4%, which gives a realistic chance of goals from both teams. A supporting signal for BTTS is that neither team has recorded a clean sheet this season (0% clean sheets), and in the last 5 matches Charlotte has scored 10 and conceded 6, while Philadelphia has scored 3 and conceded 8. Considering Charlotte's higher BTTS (67%), the recent BTTS pace (60%) and the lack of clean sheets, the Both Teams To Score scenario is more likely, hence a 64% rating for 'yes' and 36% for 'no'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG for both teams is 1.60 + 1.50 = 3.10, above the league average of 3.03, suggesting an increased number of goal-scoring opportunities. Charlotte averages 0.67 goals this season, but has scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches (2.0 average) with an average xG of 1.47; Philadelphia averages 0.50 goals this season and has only 3 goals in the last 5 matches (0.6) with an xG of 1.28 — this indicates an improvement in the home side’s form and attacking issues for the visitors. Season Over 2.5 rates are 67% for Charlotte and 50% for Philadelphia, and both teams score in 67% and 50% of matches respectively, which further supports a higher goal count. Charlotte averages 13.67 shots and 3.67 on target with a 5% conversion compared to Philadelphia’s 13.0 shots, 3.0 on target and 4% conversion, so the hosts are creating slightly more quality chances. Based on this, I recommend Over 2.5 as the strongest signal; I project 1.60 expected goals for Charlotte and 1.50 for Philadelphia (total 3.10), corresponding to an approximate 67% probability of Over 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT scenario is a half-time draw with Charlotte winning after 90 minutes (X/1). The hosts drew at the break in 60% of their last five matches, and in the second halves of those games they averaged 2.0 goals and 1.8 points, indicating an ability to break the deadlock after the interval. Philadelphia have not won in their last five matches (0% wins) and score just 0.6 goals per game on average, so their capacity for a turnaround is limited. Charlotte also has a marginally better xG (1.6 vs 1.5) and more shots on target (3.67 vs 3.0), which supports the hosts’ chance of scoring in the second half. For these reasons I assigned the highest probability to the X/1 combination (36%), with a lower share for the hosts leading at the break (1/1 = 14%) and a very low probability for a Union win (2/2 = 3%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
9Shots17
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
5Shots on target3
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
1.2xG1.7
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
6Corners7
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
37Dangerous attacks58
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
10Fouls22
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
4Cards4
CharlottePhiladelphia Union

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CharlottePhiladelphia Union
2Goals scored / match0.6
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
1.2Goals conceded / match1.8
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
49%Average possession51%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
6Shots on target / match3.4
CharlottePhiladelphia Union

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.6Shots per match13.4
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
6Shots on target3.4
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
15.9%Shot conversion4.5%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
49%Possession51%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
1.47xG for1.56
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
1.61xG against1.18
CharlottePhiladelphia Union

Shooting quality

Charlotte: Efficient finishingPhiladelphia Union: Balanced
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
Accuracy (shots on target)48%25%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.18

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Charlotte
DLWDW
Season result split
40% W40% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
WDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Philadelphia Union
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Charlotte is 233% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Charlotte · 0.6 goals / match - Philadelphia Union

Charlotte is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.2 goals / match - Charlotte · 1.8 goals / match - Philadelphia Union

Charlotte scoring profile: very strong

Charlotte scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Philadelphia Union keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

Philadelphia Union scoring profile: strong

Philadelphia Union scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Charlotte keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

10Goals scored (season)3
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
6Goals conceded (season)9
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
3.2Average goals in match2.4
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
10Goals scored (last 5)3
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
6Goals conceded (last 5)9
CharlottePhiladelphia Union

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal60%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
40%2 goals0%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
40%3 goals0%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
20%4 goals0%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
20%2 goals60%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
20%3 goals20%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
0%4 goals0%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
Philadelphia Union - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.3 of 5 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
0%BTTS in both halves0%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
40%Scored in both halves0%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
60%BTTS - last 560%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charlotte is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Charlotte · 0.4 pts / match - Philadelphia Union

Charlotte - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing
Philadelphia Union - half-time state
0% leading40% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)0.4
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.2
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
1.2Average goals (1st half)1
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
60%Clean sheet before half-time20%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
60%No goal before half-time80%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per match (2nd half)0.4
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
1.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)1
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
2Average goals (2nd half)1.4
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
60%Clean sheet after half-time20%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union
40%No goal after half-time60%
CharlottePhiladelphia Union

Charlotte - second-half results

40% W60% D0% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Philadelphia Union - second-half results

0% W40% D60% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.40
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Charlotte - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.41.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Philadelphia Union - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.40
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Charlotte
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Philadelphia Union
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
3
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Charlotte

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.94
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Philadelphia Union

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.96
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

CharlotteLigaPhiladelphia Union
Average goals in match 3.203.06 2.40
Both teams scored 60%52% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%61% 60%
Clean sheets 20%28% 0%
Goal before half-time 60%73% 80%
Goal after half-time 60%82% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.06
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.97
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+81%
Home attack advantage
+45%
Home defence advantage
+30%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Philadelphia UnionYellow cardFrancis Westfield
  2. CharlotteYellow cardDjibril Diani
  3. CharlotteGoalAshley WestwoodAssist: Idan Gurno
  4. CharlotteYellow cardDazet Wilfried Armel Zaha
  5. Philadelphia UnionYellow cardBruno Damiani
  6. Philadelphia UnionSubstitutionOn: Jesús Daniel Bueno AñezOff: Ezekiel Alladoh
  7. Philadelphia UnionYellow cardNathan Harriel
  8. Philadelphia UnionSubstitutionOn: Cavan SullivanOff: Indiana Vassilev
  9. Philadelphia UnionGoalDanley Jean JacquesAssist: Cavan Sullivan
  10. CharlotteYellow cardMorrison Agyemang
  11. Philadelphia UnionSubstitutionOn: Malik JakupovicOff: Bruno Damiani
  12. CharlotteYellow cardKristijan Kahlina
  13. Philadelphia UnionYellow cardCavan Sullivan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Drew FischerMatches officiated: 11
5.09Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 255%Home wins18%Draws27%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Charlotte vs Philadelphia Union?

The MLS match finished Charlotte 2:1 Philadelphia Union. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Charlotte vs Philadelphia Union?

Charlotte score 2.00 goals per game on average and Philadelphia Union 0.60. The MLS average is 3.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Charlotte's matches and 60% of Philadelphia Union's.

What form are Charlotte and Philadelphia Union in?

Over the last 5 games Charlotte have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Philadelphia Union 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charlotte vs Philadelphia Union?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.