England - ChampionshipData current as of 13 September 2026

Charlton Athletic vs Birmingham City: match statistics

150%(3.50)
X28%(3.45)
222%(2.16)

Charlton Athletic presents significantly better home form with 41% of matches won at home and a goal difference of -1, which is impressive compared to Birmingham City, who have only 28% wins on the road and a disastrous balance of -13. The hosts have higher shooting effectiveness in home matches (8%) and a better average xG (1.46 vs 1.14), indicating higher quality of created chances. Birmingham City fails in offense on the road, scoring an average of just 0.83 goals per match and not scoring a goal in 39% of away meetings. Recent form for both teams is similar (1 point per game in the last 5 matches), but home advantage and the guests' poor disposition on foreign grounds speak for the hosts. Charlton's high percentage of draws at home (24%) and defensive problems for both teams make a draw a real scenario as well, but the hosts have the advantage in this clash.

Charlton Athletic vs Birmingham City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Charlton Athletic played Birmingham City in Championship (England). The match was played on 7 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Charlton Athletic: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Birmingham City: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Charlton Athletic scores 0.94 and concedes 1.26 goals per match. Birmingham City scores 1.31 and concedes 1.31. League average: 2.60 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Charlton Athletic 49%, Birmingham City 57%. Over 2.5: Charlton Athletic 37%, Birmingham City 51%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Birmingham City has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.25. Charlton Athletic: 11.0 shots per match, Birmingham City: 13.9.

Match halves

Charlton Athletic: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.63. Birmingham City: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Charlton Athletic: 76-90+ (10 goals). Birmingham City: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Championship: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Charlton Athletic presents significantly better home form with 41% of matches won at home and a goal difference of -1, which is impressive compared to Birmingham City, who have only 28% wins on the road and a disastrous balance of -13. The hosts have higher shooting effectiveness in home matches (8%) and a better average xG (1.46 vs 1.14), indicating higher quality of created chances. Birmingham City fails in offense on the road, scoring an average of just 0.83 goals per match and not scoring a goal in 39% of away meetings. Recent form for both teams is similar (1 point per game in the last 5 matches), but home advantage and the guests' poor disposition on foreign grounds speak for the hosts. Charlton's high percentage of draws at home (24%) and defensive problems for both teams make a draw a real scenario as well, but the hosts have the advantage in this clash.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
12Shots7
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
4Shots on target1
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
1.26xG0.82
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
3Corners3
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
30Dangerous attacks40
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
6Fouls14
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
0Cards1
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
0.94Goals scored / match1.31
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
1.26Goals conceded / match1.31
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
43%Average possession54%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
3.51Shots on target / match3.94
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match13.94
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
3.51Shots on target3.94
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
8.6%Shot conversion9.4%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
43%Possession54%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
1.25xG for1.5
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
1.63xG against1.23
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City

Shooting quality

Charlton Athletic: BalancedBirmingham City: Balanced
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
Accuracy (shots on target)32%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Birmingham City is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Charlton Athletic · 1.4 pts / match - Birmingham City

Charlton Athletic
WLDDL
Season result split
29% W31% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-11-14
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-6
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Birmingham City
WDWLL
Season result split
37% W29% D34% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-10-12
1.40 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-10
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Birmingham City is 39% better for: goals scored per match.

0.94 goals / match - Charlton Athletic · 1.31 goals / match - Birmingham City

Charlton Athletic scoring profile: very strong

Charlton Athletic scores in 74% of matches (26 of 35 matches), while Birmingham City keeps a clean sheet in 23% (8 of 35 matches).

Birmingham City scoring profile: very strong

Birmingham City scores in 77% of matches (27 of 35 matches), while Charlton Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 35 matches).

33Goals scored (season)46
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
44Goals conceded (season)46
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
2.2Average goals in match2.63
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
4Goals scored (last 5)5
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal77%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
14%2 goals34%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
6%3 goals11%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
0%4 goals9%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal77%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
31%2 goals34%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
17%3 goals20%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
6%4 goals0%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
Charlton Athletic - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.17 of 35 matches
56%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time17%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
0%BTTS in both halves9%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
3%Scored in both halves23%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS34%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
60%BTTS - last 560%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

51%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Birmingham City is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Charlton Athletic · 1.17 pts / match - Birmingham City

Charlton Athletic - half-time state
17% leading49% draw34% trailing
Birmingham City - half-time state
31% leading23% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.17
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
0.31Goals scored (1st half)0.6
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.77
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
0.94Average goals (1st half)1.37
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
63%Clean sheet before half-time43%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
77%No goal before half-time57%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.34Points per match (2nd half)1.43
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.54
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.26
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
51%Clean sheet after half-time49%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City
46%No goal after half-time43%
Charlton AthleticBirmingham City

Charlton Athletic - second-half results

34% W31% D34% L
35
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding171%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Birmingham City - second-half results

34% W40% D26% L
41
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Charlton Athletic - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.80
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-4+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Birmingham City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Charlton Athletic
ScoredConceded
1
6
0-15
2
7
16-30
8
9
31-45
5
5
46-60
7
5
61-75
10
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Birmingham City
ScoredConceded
7
9
0-15
7
10
16-30
7
8
31-45
8
8
46-60
7
5
61-75
10
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.41
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Charlton Athletic

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Birmingham City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

Charlton AthleticLigaBirmingham City
Average goals in match 2.202.60 2.63
Both teams scored 49%56% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%51% 51%
Clean sheets 31%25% 23%
Goal before half-time 51%71% 83%
Goal after half-time 83%78% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Birmingham CityYellow cardAugust Priske
  2. Charlton AthleticGoalCharlie Kelman
  3. Charlton AthleticSubstitutionOn: Miles LeaburnOff: Lyndon Dykes
  4. Birmingham CitySubstitutionOn: Kanya FujimotoOff: Johnathan Panzo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

James LiningtonMatches officiated: 17
3.47Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 265%Home wins12%Draws24%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Charlton Athletic 0 - 1 - 0 Birmingham City. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Charlton Athletic vs Birmingham City?

The Championship match finished Charlton Athletic 1:0 Birmingham City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Charlton Athletic vs Birmingham City?

Charlton Athletic score 0.94 goals per game on average and Birmingham City 1.31. The Championship average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 49% of Charlton Athletic's matches and 57% of Birmingham City's.

What form are Charlton Athletic and Birmingham City in?

Over the last 5 games Charlton Athletic have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Birmingham City 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charlton Athletic vs Birmingham City?

The statistical background for Charlton Athletic vs Birmingham City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.