Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers: match statistics
Charlton Athletic presents solid form at home with a 46% win rate in domestic matches and a positive goal difference (+1). The hosts score an average of 1.15 goals per match with an xG of 1.44, indicating undervalued efficiency. Queens Park Rangers performs significantly worse in away matches – only 27% wins with a negative balance of -8 and averaging 0.93 goals scored on the road. The visitors also have a higher rate of goals conceded away (1.47) than Charlton at home (1.08). The recent form of both teams is unstable, yet the hosts' advantage in home matches and QPR's weakness on the road speak for a Charlton victory. Taking into account all statistical parameters, a draw is also a realistic scenario due to similar possession and shot conversion rates.
Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Charlton Athletic played Queens Park Rangers in Championship (England). The match was played on 6 February 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Charlton Athletic: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Queens Park Rangers: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Charlton Athletic scores 1.00 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Queens Park Rangers scores 1.40 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Charlton Athletic 48%, Queens Park Rangers 70%. Over 2.5: Charlton Athletic 41%, Queens Park Rangers 63%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Queens Park Rangers has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.26. Charlton Athletic: 11.0 shots per match, Queens Park Rangers: 12.6.
Match halves
Charlton Athletic: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.62. Queens Park Rangers: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
Charlton Athletic: 76-90+ (9 goals). Queens Park Rangers: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Championship: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Charlton Athletic presents solid form at home with a 46% win rate in domestic matches and a positive goal difference (+1). The hosts score an average of 1.15 goals per match with an xG of 1.44, indicating undervalued efficiency. Queens Park Rangers performs significantly worse in away matches – only 27% wins with a negative balance of -8 and averaging 0.93 goals scored on the road. The visitors also have a higher rate of goals conceded away (1.47) than Charlton at home (1.08). The recent form of both teams is unstable, yet the hosts' advantage in home matches and QPR's weakness on the road speak for a Charlton victory. Taking into account all statistical parameters, a draw is also a realistic scenario due to similar possession and shot conversion rates.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Charlton Athletic | Queens Park Rangers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Queens Park Rangers is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Charlton Athletic · 1.6 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Queens Park Rangers is 40% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Charlton Athletic · 1.4 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers
Charlton Athletic is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.31 goals / match - Charlton Athletic · 1.43 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers
Charlton Athletic scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).
Queens Park Rangers scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Charlton Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Charlton Athletic
Over / Under - Queens Park Rangers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Queens Park Rangers is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / match - Charlton Athletic · 1.3 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Charlton Athletic - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Queens Park Rangers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Charlton Athletic
Queens Park Rangers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Charlton Athletic | Liga | Queens Park Rangers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.31 | 2.58 | ▲ 2.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 57% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 51% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 25% | ▲ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 52% | 72% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 78% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Charlton Athletic 0 - 0 - 1 Queens Park Rangers. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers?
The Championship match finished Charlton Athletic 0:0 Queens Park Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers?
Charlton Athletic score 1.00 goals per game on average and Queens Park Rangers 1.40. The Championship average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Charlton Athletic's matches and 70% of Queens Park Rangers's.
What form are Charlton Athletic and Queens Park Rangers in?
Over the last 5 games Charlton Athletic have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Queens Park Rangers 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.