United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 07 September 2026

Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II: match statistics

Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chattanooga FC played Chicago Fire II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 27 June 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Chattanooga FC: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Chicago Fire II: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chattanooga FC scores 2.00 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. Chicago Fire II scores 1.36 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chattanooga FC 67%, Chicago Fire II 64%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga FC 67%, Chicago Fire II 79%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Chattanooga FC has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.53. Chattanooga FC: 13.5 shots per match, Chicago Fire II: 12.8.

Match halves

Chattanooga FC: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.93. Chicago Fire II: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Chattanooga FC: 31-45+ (7 goals). Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.25 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chattanooga FC has a clear home advantage: they average 2.14 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.77, scoring 30 goals this season and 12 in the last 5 games. Chicago Fire II score only 0.86 goals on the road on average and have an xG of 1.44, with a conversion rate of 7% versus the hosts' 15%, indicating the visitors create fewer and less efficiently converted chances. Chattanooga’s defense concedes 1.29 goals at home and keeps a clean sheet in 43% of home games, while Chicago concedes 1.57 goals away and has only 14% clean sheets. The hosts average 5.71 shots on target and 14.43 shots per home match versus the visitors’ 4.29 on target and 12.43 overall, and their goal difference at home is +6 compared to Chicago’s -5 away. Although Chicago have slightly better points per game in the last 5 (1.8 vs 1.6), the aggregate offensive and defensive metrics and a high home win rate (71%) favor a Chattanooga victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show statistical tendencies to score: Chattanooga has a seasonal BTTS of 57%, while Chicago Fire II has 71%, versus a league BTTS level of 62%, which already favors a "both teams to score" scenario. In the last 5 matches both sides had BTTS at 60% and simultaneously averaged 2.4 (Chattanooga) and 2.0 (Chicago) goals — important because despite Chicago’s seasonal away average of only 0.86 goals, recent results indicate a clear offensive improvement. xG supports this picture: xG for the home side 1.63 vs xG against 1.41, and for the visitors xG for 1.44 with xG against 1.41, i.e., the model expects ~1.6 and ~1.4 xG per team which typically translates into goals on both ends. Additionally, clean sheets are rare — Chattanooga has 29% clean sheets, Chicago only 14% — and over 2.5 rates are high (86% home, 71% away), further increasing the probability of a match with goals from both sides. Considering all numbers (BTTS 57% vs 71%, last 5 matches BTTS 60%-60%, xG ~1.6 vs 1.4, low CS 29%/14%), I back BTTS "Yes" with a probability of 72% vs 28% for "No".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model based on xG and attack vs defense matchup gives 1.52 xG for Chattanooga (1.63 xG attack vs 1.41 xG Chicago defense) and 1.43 xG for Chicago (1.44 xG attack vs 1.41 xG Chattanooga defense), totaling 2.95 expected goals. Seasonally both teams have a very high percentage of matches over 1.5 goals — 86% each — and in the last 5 matches Chattanooga averaged 2.4 goals while Chicago averaged 2.0, confirming offensive form. Both sides frequently score and concede: BTTS is 57% for the home team and 71% for the away team, and the league average is 3.23 goals per match, so a scenario with at least two goals is clearly more likely. The 2.5 line is also supported (seasonal over 2.5: 86% for Chattanooga and 71% for Chicago and in the last 5 matches 60–100% on over 2.5), hence I estimate Over 2.5 at around 66%. In summary, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (pick: Over 1.5), since both teams have 86% season matches over 1.5 and the combined xG of 2.95 points to at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Chattanooga scores on average 1.14 goals by half-time, while Chicago only 0.57, and the home side have led at the break in 4 of their matches so far (57%), indicating a clear advantage in the first 45 minutes. Over the full match Chattanooga averages 1.86 goals versus the visitors' 0.86, with xG of 1.63 versus 1.44 — this confirms better quality of created chances, further supported by a higher conversion rate of 14% versus 7%. Chicago concedes an average of 1.29 goals after the break, while Chattanooga concedes 0.86, so the hosts have a real opportunity to extend their lead in the second half. Additionally, Chattanooga wins 57% of matches compared to only 14% for Chicago, therefore the most likely and strongest scenario is a lead at the break and a win by full-time (1/1). Although Chicago averages 4.29 shots on target versus the hosts' 3.29, their lower efficiency translates those opportunities into fewer goals, which reinforces the signal to maintain Chattanooga's advantage.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
18Shots7
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
10Shots on target4
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
2.23xG1.03
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
6Corners5
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
57Dangerous attacks43
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
6Fouls6
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
1Cards0
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
2Goals scored / match1.36
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
1.73Goals conceded / match1.5
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
45%Average possession51%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
5.33Shots on target / match3.79
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.47Shots per match12.79
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
5.33Shots on target3.79
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
14.9%Shot conversion10.6%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
45%Possession51%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
1.63xG for1.53
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
1.51xG against1.41
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

Shooting quality

Chattanooga FC: Counter-attackingChicago Fire II: Balanced
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
Accuracy (shots on target)40%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire II is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Chattanooga FC · 1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire II

Chattanooga FC
WLWDD
Season result split
47% W20% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-5
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.88Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Chicago Fire II
LWLWW
Season result split
36% W21% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-6
1.29 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga FC is 47% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Chattanooga FC · 1.36 goals / match - Chicago Fire II

Chicago Fire II is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.73 goals / match - Chattanooga FC · 1.5 goals / match - Chicago Fire II

Chattanooga FC scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga FC scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).

Chicago Fire II scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire II scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Chattanooga FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

30Goals scored (season)19
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
26Goals conceded (season)21
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
3.73Average goals in match2.86
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
12Goals scored (last 5)10
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
10Goals conceded (last 5)7
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal71%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
60%2 goals36%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
33%3 goals21%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
20%4 goals7%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal79%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
47%2 goals50%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
20%3 goals21%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
20%4 goals0%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time21%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
7%BTTS in both halves7%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
33%Scored in both halves29%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS21%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
60%BTTS - last 560%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
53%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire II is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.53 pts / match - Chattanooga FC · 1.71 pts / match - Chicago Fire II

Chattanooga FC - half-time state
40% leading33% draw27% trailing
Chicago Fire II - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.53Points per match (1st half)1.71
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
1.07Goals scored (1st half)0.86
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
1.67Average goals (1st half)1.29
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
53%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
40%No goal before half-time43%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)0.86
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
1.13Goals conceded (2nd half)1.07
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
2.07Average goals (2nd half)1.57
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
40%Clean sheet after half-time21%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II
40%No goal after half-time57%
Chattanooga FCChicago Fire II

Chattanooga FC - second-half results

40% W20% R40% P
23
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire II - second-half results

14% W43% R43% P
24
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 36%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chattanooga FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.40
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.6
Average goals in match1.82.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+5-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7
Chicago Fire II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.20
Goals scored / match1.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.01.4
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+7-4
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chattanooga FC
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
7
3
31-45
7
5
46-60
1
7
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Chicago Fire II
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
0
16-30
8
2
31-45
3
7
46-60
2
3
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-39%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chattanooga FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Chicago Fire II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Chattanooga FCLigaChicago Fire II
Average goals in match 3.733.25 2.86
Both teams scored 67%62% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%65% 79%
Clean sheets 20%21% 21%
Goal before half-time 73%75% 71%
Goal after half-time 93%84% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.80
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chattanooga FCYellow cardLuke Husakiwsky
  2. Chattanooga FCSubstitutionOn: Yuval CohenOff: Keegan Ancelin
  3. Chattanooga FCGoalAlex McGrathAssist: Daniel Mangarov
  4. Chicago Fire IIGoalDamyan VillanuevaAssist: Damian Nigg
  5. Chicago Fire IIGoalDamyan VillanuevaAssist: Robert Turdean
  6. Chattanooga FCGoalDamien Barker JohnAssist: Farid Sar-Sar Cairo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Chattanooga FC 0 - 0 - 2 Chicago Fire II. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Chicago Fire II
2 : 1
Chattanooga FC
Chattanooga FC
0 : 1
Chicago Fire Premier FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Chattanooga FC 2:2 Chicago Fire II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chattanooga FC and Chicago Fire II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chattanooga FC won 0, Chicago Fire II won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II?

Chattanooga FC score 2.00 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire II 1.36. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Chattanooga FC's matches and 64% of Chicago Fire II's.

What form are Chattanooga FC and Chicago Fire II in?

Over the last 5 games Chattanooga FC have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Chicago Fire II 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chattanooga FC vs Chicago Fire II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.