Chattanooga FC vs Philadelphia Union II: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Chattanooga FC vs Philadelphia Union II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chattanooga FC play Philadelphia Union II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 26 July 2026 at 01:00.
Current form
Chattanooga FC: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Philadelphia Union II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chattanooga FC scores 1.84 and concedes 1.58 goals per match. Philadelphia Union II scores 1.11 and concedes 1.21. League average: 3.23 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chattanooga FC 68%, Philadelphia Union II 47%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga FC 58%, Philadelphia Union II 47%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Chattanooga FC has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.22. Chattanooga FC: 13.7 shots per match, Philadelphia Union II: 10.3.
Match halves
Chattanooga FC: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.89. Philadelphia Union II: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.58.
Goals by minute
Chattanooga FC: 31-45+ (9 goals). Philadelphia Union II: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 0-2-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chattanooga FC | Philadelphia Union II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga FC is 66% better for: goals scored per match.
1.84 goals / match - Chattanooga FC · 1.11 goals / match - Philadelphia Union II
Philadelphia Union II is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.58 goals / match - Chattanooga FC · 1.21 goals / match - Philadelphia Union II
Chattanooga FC scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while Philadelphia Union II keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).
Philadelphia Union II scores in 63% of matches (12 of 19 matches), while Chattanooga FC keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Chattanooga FC
Over / Under — Philadelphia Union II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chattanooga FC is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.58 pts / match - Chattanooga FC · 1.21 pts / match - Philadelphia Union II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chattanooga FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Philadelphia Union II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chattanooga FC
Philadelphia Union II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Chattanooga FC | Liga | Philadelphia Union II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.42 | 3.23 | ▼ 2.32 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 61% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 58% | 65% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | • 21% | 22% | • 21% |
| Goal before half-time | • 74% | 75% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 95% | 84% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Chattanooga FC 0 - 2 - 0 Philadelphia Union II. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
When do Chattanooga FC and Philadelphia Union II play?
Chattanooga FC face Philadelphia Union II on 25 July 2026 in MLS Next Pro. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chattanooga FC and Philadelphia Union II?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chattanooga FC won 0, Philadelphia Union II won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga FC vs Philadelphia Union II?
Chattanooga FC score 1.84 goals per game on average and Philadelphia Union II 1.11. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Chattanooga FC's matches and 47% of Philadelphia Union II's.
What form are Chattanooga FC and Philadelphia Union II in?
Over the last 5 games Chattanooga FC have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Philadelphia Union II 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga FC vs Philadelphia Union II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.