Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Fort Wayne: match statistics
Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Fort Wayne: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chattanooga Red Wolves played Fort Wayne in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Chattanooga Red Wolves: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. Fort Wayne: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 2.00 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Fort Wayne scores 0.67 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.74 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chattanooga Red Wolves 100%, Fort Wayne 33%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga Red Wolves 100%, Fort Wayne 33%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Fort Wayne has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.18. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 10.0 shots per match, Fort Wayne: 13.0.
Match halves
Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50. Fort Wayne: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.00.
Goals by minute
Chattanooga Red Wolves: 16-30 (2 goals). Fort Wayne: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chattanooga Red Wolves appear to be the favorites: they sit 11th with a season record of 1-1-0 (W-D-L), while Fort Wayne are 17th with 0-1-2. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 6 goals and averaged 1.4 points (form: 2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses), whereas Fort Wayne scored 5 goals and averaged 0.8 points (form: 1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses). Defensively Chattanooga conceded 3 goals this season and 6 in the last 5, while Fort Wayne have conceded 6 goals this season and as many as 10 in the last 5; the visitors concede on average 2.0 goals away. Fort Wayne register 57% possession and average 13 shots with 3.67 on target per match, but conversion is only 5% and goals per match 0.67 with xG 1.46, indicating wasted chances. Considering the hosts’ better efficiency and lower concessions (4 goals vs 2 this season; 6 vs 5 in the last 5), I predict a Chattanooga win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Signal analysis indicates a preference for the BTTS market: league-wide BTTS rate is 61%, BTTS occurred in 60% of the home side’s last 5 matches and 40% for the away side. In the last 5 matches the home team scored 1.2 and conceded 1.2 on average (6 scored, 6 conceded), while the away team averaged 1.0 scored and 2.0 conceded (5 scored, 10 conceded), suggesting both teams are susceptible to conceding. xG corroborates this: the home attack’s recent xG is 1.54 versus the away side’s average xG conceded of 0.93 — the home side creates more chances than the away side normally defends; the away team has xG 1.15 against the home average xG conceded of 1.13 — both sides have the potential to score around 1 goal. Additionally, the away team averages 13.0 shots and 3.67 on target per match, and season stats show the away team concedes 2.0 goals per match with 6 goals conceded this season, while the home team’s seasonal data is incomplete (seasonal average scored 0.0 and conceded 0.0 in the seasonal dataset). Considering the 61% league BTTS, the 60% home BTTS in the last 5, and the recent xG and goal balances 6:6 versus 5:10, I forecast BTTS - Yes as the stronger scenario and assign probabilities of 70% for Yes and 30% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals based on xG from the last 5 matches are 1.54 for Chattanooga and 1.15 for Fort Wayne, totaling 2.69 xG. A Poisson distribution with λ=2.69 suggests roughly a 75% probability of Over 1.5 goals, about 50% for Over 2.5 goals and around 28% for Over 3.5 goals. Additionally, Fort Wayne conceded 10 goals in their last 5 matches (2.0 per match on average), while Chattanooga scored 6 goals in those 5 matches (1.2 on average), which raises the expected number of goals. Seasonal metrics show Fort Wayne matches have a 100% incidence of Over 1.5 and 33% for Over 2.5, and Chattanooga’s last 5 matches have a 60% Over 2.5 rate; therefore the strongest and most reliable signal for this pairing is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics indicate a half-time draw with a home win at full-time (X/1) as the most likely scenario. Chattanooga were level at the break in 60% of their last five matches (3 of 5), while Fort Wayne led at half only 25% and were trailing at half in 75% of those games. Across the season Fort Wayne average 0.67 goals scored and concede 2.0 per match, with an xG of 1.46 from 13.0 shots and 3.67 on target, indicating chance creation paired with low finishing (conversion rate 5%). Chattanooga do not yet have home-season data (seasonScoredAVG_home = 0.0), but over the last five matches they average 1.4 points per game and 1.2 goals for and against, which represents a quality edge over Fort Wayne (0.8 points per game and 1.0 goals scored in the last five). Second-half data reinforce this conclusion — Fort Wayne concede on average 1.0 goal after the break and lost the second half in 75% of their last five matches; therefore I assigned the X/1 scenario the highest probability at 33%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Fort Wayne | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.57 | 0.18 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 506% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 0.33 pts / match - Fort Wayne
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 199% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 0.67 goals / match - Fort Wayne
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 2 goals / match - Fort Wayne
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Fort Wayne keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).
Fort Wayne scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Over / Under - Fort Wayne
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1 pts / match - Fort Wayne
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Fort Wayne - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 2.5 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 50% |
| No goal | 0% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.7 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.7 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 67% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chattanooga Red Wolves
Fort Wayne
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Liga | Fort Wayne | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.50 | 2.74 | • 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 57% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 51% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 26% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 71% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 74% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Fort Wayne?
The USL League One match finished Chattanooga Red Wolves 0:1 Fort Wayne. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Fort Wayne?
Chattanooga Red Wolves score 2.00 goals per game on average and Fort Wayne 0.67. The USL League One average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's matches and 33% of Fort Wayne's.
What form are Chattanooga Red Wolves and Fort Wayne in?
Over the last 5 games Chattanooga Red Wolves have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Fort Wayne 0-1-2 (0.33 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Fort Wayne?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Fort Wayne: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


