Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Greenville Triumph: match statistics
Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Greenville Triumph: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chattanooga Red Wolves played Greenville Triumph in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 5 September 2026. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Chattanooga Red Wolves: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Greenville Triumph: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.86 and concedes 1.59 goals per match. Greenville Triumph scores 1.23 and concedes 1.59. League average: 2.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chattanooga Red Wolves 64%, Greenville Triumph 45%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga Red Wolves 68%, Greenville Triumph 55%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Greenville Triumph has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.35. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 11.1 shots per match, Greenville Triumph: 12.9.
Match halves
Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 1.05. Greenville Triumph: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.55.
Goals by minute
Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (12 goals). Greenville Triumph: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chattanooga Red Wolves win 55% of their home matches and average 2.00 goals per game on home soil, while Greenville Triumph score just 0.55 goals per away match. The visitors have lost as many as 73% of their league away fixtures, and failed to score in 64% of those games, which significantly limits their chances. The hosts are admittedly in a weaker current run, with 1 win in their last 5 matches and 13 goals conceded, but Greenville have also won just once over the same period. Red Wolves create chances worth an average of 1.30 xG at home, while their opponents allow 1.63 xG away from home. With Greenville keeping clean sheets in just 9% of matches, the hosts should be able to capitalize on their attacking advantage. Chattanooga’s defence concedes an average of 1.27 goals at home, making a goal for the visitors possible, but a home win remains the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by the hosts’ current defensive form: in their last 5 matches, Chattanooga conceded an average of 2.6 goals, with opponents recording an xG of 2.10. Greenville scored 1.4 goals per match during this period, while its xG stood at 1.25, providing solid grounds to exploit the hosts’ defensive weaknesses. Chattanooga should also respond, as they average 1.91 goals at home and register 5.73 shots on target per match, while Greenville concedes an average of 1.64 goals away from home. The underlying trend is positive: BTTS landed in 100% of Chattanooga’s last five matches and in 60% of Greenville’s games, although the visitors’ season-long 27% BTTS rate and 64% of matches ending without a goal reduce confidence in the pick. Despite this reservation, the combination of the hosts’ strong attacking output and Chattanooga’s recent defensive problems marginally favours the BTTS scenario against a league average of 59%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Chattanooga Red Wolves average 1.91 goals at home, while Greenville Triumph concede 1.64 away from home, clearly supporting at least two goals in the match. The hosts average 15.36 shots and 5.73 shots on target, while the visitors have kept a clean sheet in only 9% of their away matches. The 1.5-goal line has been surpassed in 82% of Chattanooga matches and 73% of Greenville matches, with the league average standing at a high 2.96 goals. The hosts’ last five appearances produced as many as 23 goals in total, as they scored 10 and conceded 13. Greenville’s weaker seasonal attacking output, averaging 0.55 goals away from home, limits confidence in higher lines, but Over 1.5 remains the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Chattanooga have a clear advantage in the seasonal data: they average 1.91 goals at home, while Greenville score only 0.55 away from home, with the visitors losing 73% of their matches. The hosts have taken the lead at half-time more frequently, doing so in 40% of their games compared with just 9% for Greenville, who concede an average of 0.91 goals before the break and score only 0.18 themselves. Chattanooga’s superiority is also evident in their chance creation: their average xG stands at 1.74 against 1.26 for their opponents, while shots on target average 5.73 compared with 3.00. The hosts’ last five matches have been weaker, as they were trailing at half-time in 80% of them and won only once. However, Greenville remain a side with very limited attacking efficiency, failing to score in as many as 64% of their away matches. The most likely scenario is therefore that Chattanooga exploit their opponents’ weaknesses in the first half and maintain their lead until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Greenville Triumph | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1 pts / match - Greenville Triumph
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 51% better for: goals scored per match.
1.86 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.23 goals / match - Greenville Triumph
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 91% of matches (20 of 22 matches), while Greenville Triumph keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).
Greenville Triumph scores in 59% of matches (13 of 22 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Over / Under - Greenville Triumph
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.18 pts / match - Greenville Triumph
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Greenville Triumph - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chattanooga Red Wolves
Greenville Triumph
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Liga | Greenville Triumph | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.45 | 2.95 | ▼ 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 59% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 60% | ▼ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 23% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 72% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 81% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Chattanooga Red Wolves 2 - 1 - 1 Greenville Triumph. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Greenville Triumph?
The USL League One match finished Chattanooga Red Wolves 3:1 Greenville Triumph. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chattanooga Red Wolves and Greenville Triumph?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Chattanooga Red Wolves won 2, Greenville Triumph won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Greenville Triumph?
Chattanooga Red Wolves score 1.86 goals per game on average and Greenville Triumph 1.23. The USL League One average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's matches and 45% of Greenville Triumph's.
What form are Chattanooga Red Wolves and Greenville Triumph in?
Over the last 5 games Chattanooga Red Wolves have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Greenville Triumph 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Greenville Triumph?
The statistical background for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Greenville Triumph — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


