United States - USL League OneDavid Stanton Field At CCSData current as of 06 September 2026

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Naples: match statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Naples: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chattanooga Red Wolves played Naples in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 20 June 2026. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Chattanooga Red Wolves: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Naples: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 2.00 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. Naples scores 1.14 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.91 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chattanooga Red Wolves 67%, Naples 43%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga Red Wolves 78%, Naples 43%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Chattanooga Red Wolves has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.44. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 12.4 shots per match, Naples: 12.1.

Match halves

Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.89. Naples: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.64.

Goals by minute

Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (5 goals). Naples: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-0. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a Chattanooga Red Wolves win. At home they average 2.75 goals per game and 5.25 shots on target, while Naples away averages 1.17 goals and 3.5 SOT per game. The hosts have higher offensive xG (1.71 vs 1.31) and a significantly better conversion rate (21% vs 10%), indicating superior quality and efficiency in chance creation. Defensively Naples is weaker — they concede 1.83 goals on the road and have allowed 13 goals in their last 5 matches, whereas Chattanooga have conceded 7 in their last 5 and concede just 1.25 goals at home. Additionally, the hosts have a 50% home win rate and collect 1.4 points per game in their last 5 matches, while the visitors average only 0.6 points and lose 67% of away games, confirming the home side’s form advantage. Given these gaps in finishing, xG and defense, I expect the home team to win, and the match also has potential for multiple goals (the hosts’ matches average 4.0 total goals).

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes with a 70% vs 30% probability because key indicators favor goal exchange. Naples has a seasonal BTTS of 67% and concedes an average of 2.6 goals in the last 5 matches (seasonal 1.83), which significantly raises the likelihood of conceding. Chattanooga has a seasonal BTTS of only 25%, but in the last 5 games records BTTS 60% and scores an average of 2.0 goals; their xG_for is 1.54 versus the opponent’s xG_against of 1.61, so they have a realistic chance to score. Additionally, the league BTTS is 56%, and shot stats show 4.25 on target and 12.63 total shots for Chattanooga versus 3.5 and 11.33 for Naples — both teams create chances. The counterargument is that Chattanooga has 50% clean sheets this season (vs 17% for Naples), so I don’t assign extreme certainty, but a 70/30 split best reflects the data.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I calculate expected goals of 1.58 for Chattanooga and 1.23 for Naples (total 2.81) based on xG: Chattanooga xG_for 1.54 vs xG_against Naples 1.61 => 1.58; Naples xG_for 1.31 vs xG_against Chattanooga 1.15 => 1.23. The total 2.81 is close to the league average of 2.88 and, using a Poisson model, translates to ~77% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) and ~53% probability of at least 3 goals (Over 2.5). In the last 5 matches Chattanooga scored 10 goals (2.0 avg) and conceded 7, while Naples scored 6 (1.2) and conceded 13 (2.6), indicating greater defensive vulnerability for Naples. Seasonal stats reinforce this picture: Over 1.5 occurred in 63% of Chattanooga’s matches and 83% of Naples’s matches, and both teams have 100% of matches with at least one goal (Over 0.5). Therefore the strongest and most reliable signal from the data is a bet on Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The hosts are the clear favorites: they have won 50% of matches this season versus 17% for the visitors and average 1.63 points per match compared to Naples' 0.67, indicating an advantage over the full 90 minutes. xG values confirm this edge: Chattanooga generates 1.54 xG on average, Naples 1.31, while the visitors concede 1.61 xG on average; the mean of 1.54 and 1.61 yields about 1.58 expected goals for the hosts versus roughly 1.23 for the visitors (1.31 and 1.15), so the hosts have the greater win probability. At half-time the hosts also look stronger — they led at the break in 38% of matches (40% in the last five) and in those last five they averaged 1.0 goals by half-time versus Naples' 0.6, which supports HT=1. Although 67% of the visitors' matches featured goals for both teams, the hosts' better half-time form and defense (conceding 0.4 goals on average by half-time in the last five versus 1.0 for the visitors) make the scenario of leading at the break and winning at full-time (1/1) the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
11Shots8
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
3Shots on target2
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
1.33xG1.13
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
4Corners1
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
58Dangerous attacks65
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
15Fouls10
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
1Cards3
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
2Goals scored / match1.14
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
1.44Goals conceded / match1.57
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
38%Average possession53%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
4.44Shots on target / match3.93
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.44Shots per match12.14
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
4.44Shots on target3.93
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
16.1%Shot conversion9.4%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
38%Possession53%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
1.52xG for1.44
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
1.66xG against1.35
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples

Shooting quality

Chattanooga Red Wolves: Counter-attackingNaples: Balanced
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
Accuracy (shots on target)36%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 0.6 pts / match - Naples

Chattanooga Red Wolves
WLWLW
Season result split
44% W11% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-4
1.44 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-2
Last 5 at home
2-0-2
LWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.92BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Naples
LWLLL
Season result split
36% W14% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-7
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.14 goals / match - Naples

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.44 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.57 goals / match - Naples

Chattanooga Red Wolves scoring profile: strong

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Naples keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).

Naples scoring profile: very strong

Naples scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).

18Goals scored (season)16
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
13Goals conceded (season)22
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
3.44Average goals in match2.71
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
13Goals scored (last 5)6
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
7Goals conceded (last 5)13
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal79%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
67%2 goals29%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
22%3 goals7%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
22%4 goals0%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal64%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
44%2 goals50%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
11%3 goals21%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
0%4 goals14%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
Chattanooga Red Wolves - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 9 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

44%BTTS at half-time14%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
0%BTTS in both halves14%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
44%Scored in both halves21%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
60%BTTS - last 560%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

89%Min. 1 goal before half-time93%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.29 pts / match - Naples

Chattanooga Red Wolves - half-time state
44% leading33% draw22% trailing
Naples - half-time state
36% leading21% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)1.29
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
1.11Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
0.89Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
2Average goals (1st half)1.21
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
33%Clean sheet before half-time43%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
33%No goal before half-time50%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)1.07
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)0.64
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
1.44Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
56%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples
44%No goal after half-time50%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNaples

Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results

44% W22% R33% P
15
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Naples - second-half results

21% W43% R36% P
18
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.40
Goals scored / match1.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7
Naples - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.6
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-2-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
3
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Naples
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
2
4
31-45
0
4
46-60
2
3
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chattanooga Red Wolves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Naples

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Chattanooga Red WolvesLigaNaples
Average goals in match 3.442.91 2.71
Both teams scored 67%58% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 78%59% 43%
Clean sheets 11%24% 36%
Goal before half-time 89%74% 93%
Goal after half-time 89%82% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.91
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.81
Home goals / match
1.10
Away goals / match
+65%
Home attack advantage
+39%
Home defence advantage
+35%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NaplesYellow cardWilliam Arevalo
  2. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Angelo Kelly-RosalesOff: Omar Gómez
  3. NaplesSubstitutionOn: Dominick BachsteinOff: Christopher Garcia
  4. Chattanooga Red WolvesGoalOmar Hernandez
  5. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Wynand WesselsOff: Matthew Acosta
  6. NaplesYellow cardRaul Miglietti
  7. NaplesSubstitutionOn: Hudson GayOff: Taylor Gray
  8. NaplesYellow cardHudson Gay
  9. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardGreyson Mercer

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Chattanooga Red Wolves 1 - 2 - 0 Naples. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FC Naples
2 : 2
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
3 : 1
FC Naples
FC Naples
1 : 1
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC

FAQ

What was the result of Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Naples?

The USL League One match finished Chattanooga Red Wolves 1:0 Naples. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chattanooga Red Wolves and Naples?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Chattanooga Red Wolves won 1, Naples won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Naples?

Chattanooga Red Wolves score 2.00 goals per game on average and Naples 1.14. The USL League One average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's matches and 43% of Naples's.

What form are Chattanooga Red Wolves and Naples in?

Over the last 5 games Chattanooga Red Wolves have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Naples 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Naples?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.