United States - USL League OneDavid Stanton Field At CCSData current as of 01 September 2026

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs NY Cosmos: match statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs NY Cosmos: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chattanooga Red Wolves played NY Cosmos in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS. Final score: 3:3.

Current form

Chattanooga Red Wolves: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. NY Cosmos: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.84 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. NY Cosmos scores 1.05 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.91 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chattanooga Red Wolves 63%, NY Cosmos 55%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga Red Wolves 68%, NY Cosmos 70%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

NY Cosmos has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.36. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 11.2 shots per match, NY Cosmos: 12.0.

Match halves

Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 1.05. NY Cosmos: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (9 goals). NY Cosmos: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chattanooga Red Wolves are significantly more effective at home, averaging 1.89 goals per match, while NY Cosmos score just 0.78 goals away from home. The hosts have won 67% of their home games and kept a clean sheet in 56% of them, whereas Cosmos have lost every away match, conceding an average of 2.89 goals. The difference is also reflected in their current form: Red Wolves have recorded 3 wins in their last 5 matches and scored 10 goals during that run, while the visitors have managed just 2 goals over the same period. Cosmos do have a higher away xG, 1.39 compared with the hosts’ 1.34, but they are extremely inefficient in front of goal, converting just 7% of their shots compared with 18% for Red Wolves. The visitors’ poor defensive record, with not a single clean sheet away from home, should allow the hosts to capitalize on their home advantage and secure the win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Chattanooga Red Wolves have recorded BTTS in 80% of their last five matches, scoring an average of 2.0 goals while conceding as many as 2.2. NY Cosmos have shown weaker recent attacking form, scoring just 2 goals in their last five outings and recording BTTS in 20% of matches, which clearly reduces confidence in the pick. However, the hosts have allowed opponents an xG of 1.89 over their last five league fixtures, while Cosmos create an average of 1.44 xG, giving the visitors a realistic route to scoring at least once. In addition, Cosmos have failed to keep a clean sheet in every match this season and concede an average of 2.89 goals, while Red Wolves register 5.0 shots on target per game. The hosts’ superior attacking quality, combined with their defensive vulnerability, marginally supports BTTS - Yes, although the visitors’ low recent goal output makes this a moderate-strength pick.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Chattanooga Red Wolves should create plenty of chances against an NY Cosmos defense that concedes an average of 2.89 goals per game and has kept no clean sheets. The hosts generate an average of 1.60 xG and 5.0 shots on target, while their opponents allow an average of 1.81 xG. The 1.5 line has been covered in 70% of the hosts’ matches and in all NY Cosmos games, while Over 2.5 goals has landed in 60% and 89% of matches, respectively. Red Wolves’ last five games produced as many as 21 goals, or 4.2 per match, although Cosmos’ scoring form is weaker at just 0.4 goals per game. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5 goals, as even a limited contribution from the visitors should not be enough to halt the hosts’ attack against such a vulnerable defense.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Chattanooga Red Wolves win, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 70% of their matches, while NY Cosmos recorded a half-time draw in 60% of their last five games. The opening stages should be cautious: Red Wolves average just 0.3 goals before the break, compared with Cosmos’ 0.11, while the visitors have failed to score in the first half in each of their last five matches. After the break, the hosts’ advantage increases, as they average 0.9 goals overall and as many as 1.6 goals in the second half across their last five games. Cosmos concede an average of 1.33 goals after half-time and have lost every match played this season, allowing opponents 2.89 goals per game. In addition, Chattanooga have a higher xG of 1.60 compared with 1.39, and average 5.0 shots on target against their opponents’ 3.56, reinforcing the HT/FT turnaround scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

36Possession (%)64
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
8Shots26
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
5Shots on target7
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
1.21xG2.89
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
3Corners8
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
48Dangerous attacks107
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
15Fouls8
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
2Cards2
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
1.84Goals scored / match1.05
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
1.53Goals conceded / match2
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
37%Average possession46%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
4.05Shots on target / match4.25
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.16Shots per match12
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
4.05Shots on target4.25
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
16.5%Shot conversion8.8%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
37%Possession46%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
1.36xG for1.48
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
1.69xG against1.66
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos

Shooting quality

Chattanooga Red Wolves: Counter-attackingNY Cosmos: Balanced
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
WLLWL
Season result split
53% W5% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-1-8
1.63 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-0-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 0.92Opponent xG: 2.06BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
NY Cosmos
LLLWW
Season result split
25% W10% R65% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-13
0.85 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-9
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

1.84 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.05 goals / match - NY Cosmos

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.53 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 2 goals / match - NY Cosmos

Chattanooga Red Wolves scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while NY Cosmos keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).

NY Cosmos scoring profile: very strong

NY Cosmos scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).

35Goals scored (season)21
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
29Goals conceded (season)40
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
3.37Average goals in match3.05
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
8Goals scored (last 5)4
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
12Goals conceded (last 5)7
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal75%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
58%2 goals25%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
16%3 goals5%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
16%4 goals0%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal75%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
47%2 goals75%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
21%3 goals45%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
5%4 goals5%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
Chattanooga Red Wolves - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 19 matches
57%
League average

Goal patterns

37%BTTS at half-time10%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
0%BTTS in both halves5%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
26%Scored in both halves20%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
80%BTTS - last 520%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
26%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time95%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.16 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 0.75 pts / match - NY Cosmos

Chattanooga Red Wolves - half-time state
26% leading37% draw37% trailing
NY Cosmos - half-time state
10% leading45% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.16Points per match (1st half)0.75
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
0.79Goals scored (1st half)0.25
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
0.95Goals conceded (1st half)0.95
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
1.74Average goals (1st half)1.2
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
37%Clean sheet before half-time45%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
47%No goal before half-time80%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos

After half-time (2nd half)

1.74Points per match (2nd half)1.25
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
1.05Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)1.05
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.85
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
58%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos
37%No goal after half-time25%
Chattanooga Red WolvesNY Cosmos

Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results

53% W16% R32% P
22
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding204%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

NY Cosmos - second-half results

35% W20% R45% P
15
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding250%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.201.80
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.60.8
Average goals in match2.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-5+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
NY Cosmos - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
ScoredConceded
5
10
0-15
6
2
16-30
4
6
31-45
9
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

NY Cosmos
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
4
6
16-30
0
8
31-45
7
10
46-60
2
5
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.21
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chattanooga Red Wolves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

NY Cosmos

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Chattanooga Red WolvesLigaNY Cosmos
Average goals in match 3.372.91 3.05
Both teams scored 63%57% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%60% 70%
Clean sheets 26%25% 25%
Goal before half-time 79%70% 65%
Goal after half-time 89%79% 95%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.91
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+58%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+32%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chattanooga Red WolvesGoalPedro Hernandez
  2. Chattanooga Red WolvesGoalOluwatobilba AdewoleAssist: Eric Kinzner
  3. NY CosmosSubstitutionOn: Davide GalazziniOff: Massimo Morabito
  4. NY CosmosYellow cardDavide Galazzini
  5. NY CosmosGoalNestor Cabrera
  6. Chattanooga Red WolvesGoalYanis Lelin VegasAssist: Omar Hernandez
  7. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Beto ApolinarOff: Jordan Ayimbila
  8. NY CosmosGoalPhilip SpenglerAssist: Justin Milovanov
  9. NY CosmosSubstitutionOn: Nicholas ZielonkaOff: Lamin Jawneh
  10. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardMichael Knapp
  11. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Nathan DonohoOff: Matthew Bentley
  12. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardBeto Apolinar
  13. NY CosmosYellow cardAnges Patrick Kader Bohui

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Chattanooga Red Wolves vs NY Cosmos?

The USL League One match finished Chattanooga Red Wolves 3:3 NY Cosmos. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga Red Wolves vs NY Cosmos?

Chattanooga Red Wolves score 1.84 goals per game on average and NY Cosmos 1.05. The USL League One average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's matches and 55% of NY Cosmos's.

What form are Chattanooga Red Wolves and NY Cosmos in?

Over the last 5 games Chattanooga Red Wolves have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and NY Cosmos 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs NY Cosmos?

The statistical background for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs NY Cosmos — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.