United States - USL League OneDavid Stanton Field At CCSData current as of 20 September 2026

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Portland Hearts of Pine: match statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Portland Hearts of Pine: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chattanooga Red Wolves played Portland Hearts of Pine in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 19 September 2026. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Chattanooga Red Wolves: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Portland Hearts of Pine: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.84 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. Portland Hearts of Pine scores 1.46 and concedes 1.73. League average: 2.96 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chattanooga Red Wolves 64%, Portland Hearts of Pine 77%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga Red Wolves 64%, Portland Hearts of Pine 65%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Portland Hearts of Pine has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.37. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 11.3 shots per match, Portland Hearts of Pine: 12.0.

Match halves

Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.96. Portland Hearts of Pine: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.96.

Goals by minute

Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (12 goals). Portland Hearts of Pine: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-1. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chattanooga Red Wolves sit higher in the table, in 6th place compared with Portland Hearts of Pine in 11th, and have won 12 matches this season against their opponents’ 7 victories. At home, the hosts win 58% of their matches and score an average of 2.08 goals, while Portland win just 15% of their away games and concede as many as 2.08 goals per match. The Red Wolves’ superiority is also evident in their finishing: they convert 21% of their shots compared with the visitors’ 15%, and fail to score in only 8% of their home matches, versus 23% of Portland’s away fixtures. The visitors do have slightly more possession, 48% to 39%, but create weaker chances away from home, with an average xG of 1.22, while their defense allows opponents an xG of 2.14. Recent form is fairly similar, with Chattanooga collecting 8 points from five matches and Portland 7; however, the hosts’ significantly stronger home statistics point to a Chattanooga victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for goals from both sides is very strong, as both Chattanooga Red Wolves and Portland Hearts of Pine have recorded BTTS in 77% of their matches, compared with the league average of 60%. Over their last five matches, this figure has risen to 80% for both teams, while they conceded an average of 1.6 and 1.8 goals, respectively. The hosts score an average of 1.46 goals, while Portland concede as many as 2.08 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in only 8% of their appearances. The visitors have a lower attacking potential, with an average xG of 1.22, but Chattanooga allow opponents an xG of 1.60, rising to 2.03 over their last five matches. The most likely scenario is therefore that the hosts will exploit Portland’s defensive weakness, while the visitors will find at least one goal against the vulnerable Red Wolves defence.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have surpassed the 1.5-goal mark in 85% of their matches this season, creating a very strong signal for at least two goals. Chattanooga average 1.46 goals per game, while Portland concede as many as 2.08 per match, with the hosts’ average xG standing at 1.66 compared to the 2.14 xG allowed by their opponents. Portland score an average of 1.46 goals, while Chattanooga’s defence allows opponents 1.60 xG, meaning the visitors should also create genuine scoring opportunities. In their last five matches, the teams averaged 3.6 total goals each, and in both cases, 60% of those games finished Over 2.5 goals. However, the safest selection remains Over 1.5 goals, as the low line is supported by both full-season statistics and the high 77% rate of matches in which both teams scored.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is Chattanooga Red Wolves leading at the break and securing the win after the final whistle, as the hosts were ahead at half-time in 80% of their last five matches, scoring an average of 1.2 goals during that period. Over the same timeframe, Portland Hearts of Pine scored just 0.4 goals before the break, while across the season they failed to score in the first half in 75% of their matches. The hosts possess greater attacking potential: their average xG stands at 1.66 compared with 1.22 for the visitors, and they also average 14.15 shots per match versus 9.85 for their opponents. Portland’s defence concedes an average of 2.08 goals per match and allows an xG of 2.14, which favours the Red Wolves maintaining their lead. Caution is warranted because both teams have scored and conceded in 77% of their league matches, making a draw at half-time followed by a home win a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
13Shots9
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
5Shots on target2
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
1.62xG0.98
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
10Corners4
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
63Dangerous attacks37
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
15Fouls9
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
2Cards0
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
1.84Goals scored / match1.46
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
1.48Goals conceded / match1.73
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
38%Average possession51%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
4.08Shots on target / match4
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.32Shots per match12
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
4.08Shots on target4
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
16.3%Shot conversion12.2%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
38%Possession51%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
1.37xG for1.44
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
1.73xG against1.87
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

Shooting quality

Chattanooga Red Wolves: Counter-attackingPortland Hearts of Pine: Balanced
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Accuracy (shots on target)36%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.4 pts / match - Portland Hearts of Pine

Chattanooga Red Wolves
LWWDW
Season result split
52% W12% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-3-9
1.68 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Portland Hearts of Pine
DLLWW
Season result split
27% W31% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-11
1.12 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-6
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LDDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 26% better for: goals scored per match.

1.84 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.46 goals / match - Portland Hearts of Pine

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.48 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.73 goals / match - Portland Hearts of Pine

Chattanooga Red Wolves scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 92% of matches (23 of 25 matches), while Portland Hearts of Pine keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 26 matches).

Portland Hearts of Pine scoring profile: very strong

Portland Hearts of Pine scores in 81% of matches (21 of 26 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).

46Goals scored (season)38
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
37Goals conceded (season)45
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
3.32Average goals in match3.19
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal81%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
56%2 goals38%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
20%3 goals19%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
12%4 goals4%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal88%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
44%2 goals50%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
24%3 goals23%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
4%4 goals8%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
Chattanooga Red Wolves - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 25 matches
77%
Portland Hearts of Pine - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.20 of 26 matches
60%
League average

Goal patterns

32%BTTS at half-time8%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
4%BTTS in both halves0%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
28%Scored in both halves15%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS62%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
60%BTTS - last 580%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time35%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.48 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.08 pts / match - Portland Hearts of Pine

Chattanooga Red Wolves - half-time state
40% leading28% draw32% trailing
Portland Hearts of Pine - half-time state
23% leading38% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.48Points per match (1st half)1.08
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.38
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
1.68Average goals (1st half)0.92
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
44%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
40%No goal before half-time69%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

After half-time (2nd half)

1.48Points per match (2nd half)1.04
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
0.96Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
1.64Average goals (2nd half)2.04
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
52%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine
40%No goal after half-time38%
Chattanooga Red WolvesPortland Hearts of Pine

Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results

40% W28% D32% L
37
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Portland Hearts of Pine - second-half results

19% W46% D35% L
28
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.400.80
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Portland Hearts of Pine - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
ScoredConceded
8
10
0-15
6
3
16-30
8
7
31-45
12
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Portland Hearts of Pine
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
2
6
16-30
4
5
31-45
8
5
46-60
3
9
61-75
14
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
71%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chattanooga Red Wolves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Portland Hearts of Pine

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Chattanooga Red WolvesLigaPortland Hearts of Pine
Average goals in match 3.322.96 3.19
Both teams scored 64%60% 77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%59% 65%
Clean sheets 28%23% 12%
Goal before half-time 84%73% 65%
Goal after half-time 84%81% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+45%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Portland Hearts of PineSubstitutionOn: Felipe Rodriguez-GentileOff: Ollie Wright
  2. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardMichael Knapp
  3. Portland Hearts of PineGoalFelipe Rodriguez-GentileAssist: Matteo Kidd
  4. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Wynand WesselsOff: Michael Knapp
  5. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Aaron LombardiOff: Matthew Bentley
  6. Chattanooga Red WolvesSubstitutionOn: Dyson ClapierOff: James Vaughan
  7. Portland Hearts of PineSubstitutionOn: Diego LetayfOff: Aboubacar Camara
  8. Chattanooga Red WolvesYellow cardWynand Wessels
  9. Chattanooga Red WolvesGoalOmar HernandezAssist: Omar Gómez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Chattanooga Red Wolves 2 - 1 - 1 Portland Hearts of Pine. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 75% matches.

Portland Hearts of Pine
1 : 2
Chattanooga Red Wolves
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
0 : 1
Portland Hearts of Pine SC
Portland Hearts of Pine SC
1 : 1
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
2 : 1
Portland Hearts of Pine SC

FAQ

What was the result of Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Portland Hearts of Pine?

The USL League One match finished Chattanooga Red Wolves 1:1 Portland Hearts of Pine. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chattanooga Red Wolves and Portland Hearts of Pine?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Chattanooga Red Wolves won 2, Portland Hearts of Pine won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Portland Hearts of Pine?

Chattanooga Red Wolves score 1.84 goals per game on average and Portland Hearts of Pine 1.46. The USL League One average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's matches and 77% of Portland Hearts of Pine's.

What form are Chattanooga Red Wolves and Portland Hearts of Pine in?

Over the last 5 games Chattanooga Red Wolves have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Portland Hearts of Pine 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Portland Hearts of Pine?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.