Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Spokane Velocity: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Spokane Velocity: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chattanooga Red Wolves play Spokane Velocity in USL League One (United States). The match date is 1 August 2026. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS.
Current form
Chattanooga Red Wolves: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Spokane Velocity: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.88 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Spokane Velocity scores 1.39 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.88 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chattanooga Red Wolves 56%, Spokane Velocity 44%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga Red Wolves 63%, Spokane Velocity 61%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Chattanooga Red Wolves has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.40. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 12.1 shots per match, Spokane Velocity: 11.7.
Match halves
Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.00. Spokane Velocity: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.72.
Goals by minute
Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (7 goals). Spokane Velocity: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.88 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Spokane Velocity | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 35% better for: goals scored per match.
1.88 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.39 goals / match - Spokane Velocity
Spokane Velocity is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.38 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.22 goals / match - Spokane Velocity
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Spokane Velocity keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).
Spokane Velocity scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Chattanooga Red Wolves
Over / Under — Spokane Velocity
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Spokane Velocity - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chattanooga Red Wolves
Spokane Velocity
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Liga | Spokane Velocity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.25 | 2.88 | ▼ 2.61 |
| Both teams scored | • 56% | 55% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 60% | • 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 26% | ▲ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 72% | • 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 80% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Chattanooga Red Wolves 2 - 0 - 0 Spokane Velocity. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
When do Chattanooga Red Wolves and Spokane Velocity play?
Chattanooga Red Wolves face Spokane Velocity on 1 August 2026 in USL League One at David Stanton Field At CCS. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chattanooga Red Wolves and Spokane Velocity?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chattanooga Red Wolves won 2, Spokane Velocity won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Spokane Velocity?
Chattanooga Red Wolves score 1.88 goals per game on average and Spokane Velocity 1.39. The USL League One average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's matches and 44% of Spokane Velocity's.
What form are Chattanooga Red Wolves and Spokane Velocity in?
Over the last 5 games Chattanooga Red Wolves have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Spokane Velocity 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Spokane Velocity?
The statistical background for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Spokane Velocity — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.