United States - USL League OneDavid Stanton Field At CCSData current as of 17 October 2026

Match suspended or postponed

The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Spokane Velocity: match statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves crest
Chattanooga Red Wolves
vs
Spokane Velocity crest
Spokane Velocity

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Spokane Velocity: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chattanooga Red Wolves play Spokane Velocity in USL League One (United States). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS.

Current form

Chattanooga Red Wolves: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Spokane Velocity: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.74 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. Spokane Velocity scores 1.48 and concedes 1.32. League average: 2.97 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chattanooga Red Wolves 63%, Spokane Velocity 56%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga Red Wolves 59%, Spokane Velocity 64%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Spokane Velocity has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.42. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 11.6 shots per match, Spokane Velocity: 12.2.

Match halves

Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.93. Spokane Velocity: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (12 goals). Spokane Velocity: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.97 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.59Points per matchPPG - points per game.1.72
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
1.74Goals scored / match1.48
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
1.44Goals conceded / match1.32
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
1.42xG forxG - expected goals, the quality of scoring chances.1.46
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
40%Average possession51%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
4.19Shots on target / match3.88
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
26%Clean sheetsClean sheet - a match with no goal conceded.24%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
63%Both teams scoredBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.56%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.63Shots per match12.24
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
4.19Shots on target3.88
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
15%Shot conversion12.1%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
40%Possession51%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
1.42xG for1.46
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
1.69xG against1.4
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

Shooting quality

Chattanooga Red Wolves: Counter-attackingSpokane Velocity: Balanced
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
Accuracy (shots on target)36%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
WDWDL
Season result split
48% W15% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-10
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Spokane Velocity
WDLDW
Season result split
52% W16% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-8
1.72 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-5
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga Red Wolves is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1.74 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.48 goals / match - Spokane Velocity

Spokane Velocity is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.44 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.32 goals / match - Spokane Velocity

Chattanooga Red Wolves scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 89% of matches (24 of 27 matches), while Spokane Velocity keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).

Spokane Velocity scoring profile: very strong

Spokane Velocity scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 26% (7 of 27 matches).

47Goals scored (season)37
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
39Goals conceded (season)33
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
3.19Average goals in match2.8
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
6Goals scored (last 5)8
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
Chattanooga Red Wolves
26%
Clean sheetsClean sheet - a match with no goal conceded.7 of 27 matches
11%
No goalFailed to score - a match where the team did not score.3 of 27 matches
Spokane Velocity
24%
Clean sheetsClean sheet - a match with no goal conceded.6 of 25 matches
24%
No goalFailed to score - a match where the team did not score.6 of 25 matches

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal76%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
52%2 goals48%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
19%3 goals24%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
11%4 goals0%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal76%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
41%2 goals28%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
22%3 goals20%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
4%4 goals8%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
Chattanooga Red Wolves - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.17 of 27 matches
56%
Spokane Velocity - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 25 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time16%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
4%BTTS in both halves0%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
26%Scored in both halves24%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
60%BTTS - last 580%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

100%Min. 1 goal (Over 0.5)Over 0.5 - at least one goal in the match.96%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
74%Min. 2 goals (Over 1.5)Over 1.5 - at least two goals in the match.76%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
59%Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)Over 2.5 - at least three goals in the match.64%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
41%Min. 4 goals (Over 3.5)Over 3.5 - at least four goals in the match.40%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
30%Min. 5 goals (Over 4.5)Over 4.5 - at least five goals in the match.4%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves

Line 0.5 (min. 1 goal)Over 0.5 - at least one goal in the match.
Over 100%Under 0%
Line 1.5 (min. 2 goals)Over 1.5 - at least two goals in the match.
Over 74%Under 26%
Line 2.5 (min. 3 goals)Over 2.5 - at least three goals in the match.
Over 59%Under 41%
Line 3.5 (min. 4 goals)Over 3.5 - at least four goals in the match.
Over 41%Under 59%
Line 4.5 (min. 5 goals)Over 4.5 - at least five goals in the match.
Over 30%Under 70%

Over / Under - Spokane Velocity

Line 0.5 (min. 1 goal)Over 0.5 - at least one goal in the match.
Over 96%Under 4%
Line 1.5 (min. 2 goals)Over 1.5 - at least two goals in the match.
Over 76%Under 24%
Line 2.5 (min. 3 goals)Over 2.5 - at least three goals in the match.
Over 64%Under 36%
Line 3.5 (min. 4 goals)Over 3.5 - at least four goals in the match.
Over 40%Under 60%
Line 4.5 (min. 5 goals)Over 4.5 - at least five goals in the match.
Over 4%Under 96%

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - half-time state
37% leading26% draw37% trailing
Spokane Velocity - half-time state
36% leading32% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.37Points per match (1st half)1.4
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
0.81Goals scored (1st half)0.68
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
0.81Goals conceded (1st half)0.72
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
1.63Average goals (1st half)1.4
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
41%Clean sheet before half-time52%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
44%No goal before half-time56%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

After half-time (2nd half)

1.52Points per match (2nd half)1.52
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
1.56Average goals (2nd half)1.4
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
56%Clean sheet after half-time56%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity
41%No goal after half-time44%
Chattanooga Red WolvesSpokane Velocity

Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results

41% W30% D30% L
37
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Spokane Velocity - second-half results

44% W20% D36% L
35
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chattanooga Red Wolves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Spokane Velocity - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.60
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match1.20.2
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference-4+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chattanooga Red Wolves
ScoredConceded
8
10
0-15
6
3
16-30
8
9
31-45
12
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Spokane Velocity
ScoredConceded
4
8
0-15
7
3
16-30
6
7
31-45
7
6
46-60
8
2
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.99
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chattanooga Red Wolves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Spokane Velocity

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Chattanooga Red WolvesLigaSpokane Velocity
Average goals in match▲ 3.192.97▼ 2.80
Both teams scored▲ 63%61%▼ 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 59%60%▲ 64%
Clean sheets▲ 26%23%• 24%
Goal before half-time▲ 85%74%▲ 76%
Goal after half-time• 81%81%▲ 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.97
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+45%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Home managerScott MacKenzieAway managerLeigh Veidman

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Chattanooga Red Wolves 2 - 0 - 0 Spokane Velocity. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Spokane Velocity FC
1 : 2
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
Chattanooga Red Wolves SC
3 : 0
Spokane Velocity FC