Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Spokane Velocity: match statistics
Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Spokane Velocity: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chattanooga Red Wolves play Spokane Velocity in USL League One (United States). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: David Stanton Field At CCS.
Current form
Chattanooga Red Wolves: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Spokane Velocity: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.90 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Spokane Velocity scores 1.52 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.96 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chattanooga Red Wolves 67%, Spokane Velocity 52%. Over 2.5: Chattanooga Red Wolves 71%, Spokane Velocity 67%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Spokane Velocity has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.34. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 10.9 shots per match, Spokane Velocity: 12.1.
Match halves
Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.10. Spokane Velocity: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (12 goals). Spokane Velocity: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Spokane Velocity | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.47 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Spokane Velocity is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 2.4 pts / match - Spokane Velocity
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 25% better for: goals scored per match.
1.9 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.52 goals / match - Spokane Velocity
Spokane Velocity is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.29 goals / match - Spokane Velocity
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 90% of matches (19 of 21 matches), while Spokane Velocity keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 matches).
Spokane Velocity scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Over / Under - Spokane Velocity
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Spokane Velocity is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.19 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves · 1.62 pts / match - Spokane Velocity
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Spokane Velocity - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chattanooga Red Wolves
Spokane Velocity
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Liga | Spokane Velocity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.57 | 2.96 | ▼ 2.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 59% | ▼ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 61% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | • 24% | 23% | • 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 73% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 81% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Chattanooga Red Wolves 2 - 0 - 0 Spokane Velocity. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.