Chełmianka Chełm vs Siarka Tarnobrzeg: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Chełmianka Chełm vs Siarka Tarnobrzeg: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chełmianka Chełm play Siarka Tarnobrzeg in 3 Liga Group 4 (Poland). The match date is 12 September 2026.
Current form
Chełmianka Chełm: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Siarka Tarnobrzeg: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chełmianka Chełm scores 1.86 and concedes 0.14 goals per match. Siarka Tarnobrzeg scores 1.29 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.84 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chełmianka Chełm 14%, Siarka Tarnobrzeg 43%. Over 2.5: Chełmianka Chełm 29%, Siarka Tarnobrzeg 29%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Chełmianka Chełm has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.29. Chełmianka Chełm: 3.6 shots per match, Siarka Tarnobrzeg: 5.1.
Match halves
Chełmianka Chełm: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.14. Siarka Tarnobrzeg: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
Chełmianka Chełm: 0-15 (7 goals). Siarka Tarnobrzeg: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3 Liga Group 4: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chełmianka Chełm | Siarka Tarnobrzeg | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.48 | 0.25 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.86 | 0.65 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chełmianka Chełm is 67% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - Chełmianka Chełm · 1.8 pts / match - Siarka Tarnobrzeg
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chełmianka Chełm is 44% better for: goals scored per match.
1.86 goals / match - Chełmianka Chełm · 1.29 goals / match - Siarka Tarnobrzeg
Chełmianka Chełm is 714% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.14 goals / match - Chełmianka Chełm · 1.14 goals / match - Siarka Tarnobrzeg
Chełmianka Chełm scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while Siarka Tarnobrzeg keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).
Siarka Tarnobrzeg scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Chełmianka Chełm keeps a clean sheet in 86% (6 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chełmianka Chełm
Over / Under - Siarka Tarnobrzeg
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chełmianka Chełm is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.86 pts / match - Chełmianka Chełm · 1.29 pts / match - Siarka Tarnobrzeg
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chełmianka Chełm - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Siarka Tarnobrzeg - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chełmianka Chełm
Siarka Tarnobrzeg
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 4).
Teams vs league
| Chełmianka Chełm | Liga | Siarka Tarnobrzeg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.00 | 2.84 | ▼ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 14% | 51% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 51% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 86% | 28% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 43% | 56% | • 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 14% | 57% | ▲ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Chełmianka Chełm 2 - 0 - 0 Siarka Tarnobrzeg. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
When do Chełmianka Chełm and Siarka Tarnobrzeg play?
Chełmianka Chełm face Siarka Tarnobrzeg on 12 September 2026 in 3 Liga Group 4. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chełmianka Chełm and Siarka Tarnobrzeg?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chełmianka Chełm won 2, Siarka Tarnobrzeg won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chełmianka Chełm vs Siarka Tarnobrzeg?
Chełmianka Chełm score 1.86 goals per game on average and Siarka Tarnobrzeg 1.29. The 3 Liga Group 4 average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 14% of Chełmianka Chełm's matches and 43% of Siarka Tarnobrzeg's.
What form are Chełmianka Chełm and Siarka Tarnobrzeg in?
Over the last 5 games Chełmianka Chełm have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Siarka Tarnobrzeg 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chełmianka Chełm vs Siarka Tarnobrzeg?
The statistical background for Chełmianka Chełm vs Siarka Tarnobrzeg — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.