Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur: match statistics
Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chelsea played Tottenham Hotspur in Premier League (England). The match was played on 19 May 2026. Venue: Stamford Bridge. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Chelsea: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Tottenham Hotspur: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chelsea scores 1.53 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Tottenham Hotspur scores 1.28 and concedes 1.53. League average: 2.76 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chelsea 61%, Tottenham Hotspur 61%. Over 2.5: Chelsea 64%, Tottenham Hotspur 64%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Chelsea has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.32. Chelsea: 13.7 shots per match, Tottenham Hotspur: 11.3.
Match halves
Chelsea: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.83. Tottenham Hotspur: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.75.
Goals by minute
Chelsea: 31-45+ (13 goals). Tottenham Hotspur: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Premier League: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (Chelsea). Chelsea has a clear advantage in chance creation: home xG averages 1.74 versus Tottenham's 1.22; the hosts average 15.5 shots (4.22 on target) with 60% possession, and have scored 55 goals this season versus the visitors' 46. Tottenham is, however, more efficient and in better recent form—conversion 13% versus 9% for Chelsea, 6 goals in the last 5 matches compared to Chelsea's 3, and a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (PPG 1.6) versus the hosts' 1-1-3 and PPG 0.8. Both teams concede on average 1.33 goals per match, but xG against shows Tottenham allows more high-quality chances (1.47 vs 1.21), which increases Chelsea's offensive prospects. Considering the creative advantage and home field edge against the visitors' efficiency, I give Chelsea a small but clear edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season BTTS metrics favor a Both Teams To Score scenario: Chelsea has BTTS at 72% vs Tottenham 50%, with a league average of 56%. In goals and xG terms Chelsea scores 1.17 and concedes 1.72 (xG 1.43) per match, while Tottenham scores 1.39 and concedes 1.33 (xG 1.22), indicating both sides create scoring opportunities. The last 5 matches present a mixed picture: Chelsea BTTS 40% with an average of 0.6 scored and 1.6 conceded, whereas Tottenham BTTS 60% with 1.2 scored and 1.0 conceded, so recent form slightly reduces model confidence. Tottenham keeps clean sheets more often (33% vs Chelsea 11%), but Chelsea have scored 55 and conceded 49 this season with an average of 12.28 shots and 3.94 on target, which raises the opponents’ chance to score; therefore I assign 62% to 'BTTS - Yes' and 38% to 'No' and recommend a bet on BTTS = Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seasonal indicators strongly support at least two goals: Chelsea have 89% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Tottenham 78%, averaging 83.5% and suggesting Over 1.5 at 84%. xG metrics reinforce this: Chelsea’s attacking xG is 1.43, Tottenham’s attacking xG 1.22, while xG against are 1.36 (Chelsea) and 1.47 (Tottenham) — translating to expected ~1.45 goals for Chelsea and ~1.29 for Tottenham, totaling ~2.74 goals. Seasonal Over 2.5 percentages are 67% for Chelsea and 61% for Tottenham (average ~64%), so I rate Over 2.5 at 64%, whereas Over 3.5 has weak backing at 28%/28% (hence Over 3.5 = 28%). Additionally, Chelsea record Both Teams To Score in 72% of matches, Tottenham in 50%, and in the last 5 matches Chelsea scored 3 and conceded 8, while Tottenham scored 6 and conceded 5 — this increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Based on this, I recommend the strongest signal as Over 1.5 (line 1.5) with an expected total goals around 2.74.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a Tottenham victory at full-time (X/2). Tottenham has a 39% win rate this season versus Chelsea’s 11%, and averages 1.44 points away compared to Chelsea’s 0.67 points at home, giving a clear advantage to the visitors. Both teams frequently draw at the break — Chelsea draws at half-time in 33% of matches, Tottenham in 39%, and in their last five games Tottenham were level at the break in 80% of cases — hence an expected draw after the first 45 minutes. In the second half Tottenham are stronger: away they average 1.5 points in second halves and have a +3 goal difference in second halves, while Chelsea have 1.17 points and a -2 goal difference, so the visitors are more likely to achieve a turnaround after half-time. Additionally, Chelsea concede an average of 0.89 goals before the break and their home matches feature both teams scoring in 72% of cases, which increases the likelihood of a Full-Time result in Tottenham’s favor after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chelsea | Tottenham Hotspur | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tottenham Hotspur is 700% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Chelsea · 1.6 pts / match - Tottenham Hotspur
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chelsea is 20% better for: goals scored per match.
1.53 goals / match - Chelsea · 1.28 goals / match - Tottenham Hotspur
Chelsea is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.36 goals / match - Chelsea · 1.53 goals / match - Tottenham Hotspur
Chelsea scores in 81% of matches (29 of 36 matches), while Tottenham Hotspur keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 36 matches).
Tottenham Hotspur scores in 81% of matches (29 of 36 matches), while Chelsea keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chelsea
Over / Under - Tottenham Hotspur
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chelsea is 56% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - Chelsea · 0.94 pts / match - Tottenham Hotspur
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chelsea - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 36%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tottenham Hotspur - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chelsea
Tottenham Hotspur
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Chelsea | Liga | Tottenham Hotspur | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.89 | 2.76 | • 2.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 56% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 55% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 26% | ▼ 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 71% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | • 78% | 79% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Chelsea 1 - 0 - 0 Tottenham Hotspur. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur?
The Premier League match finished Chelsea 2:1 Tottenham Hotspur. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur?
Chelsea score 1.53 goals per game on average and Tottenham Hotspur 1.28. The Premier League average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Chelsea's matches and 61% of Tottenham Hotspur's.
What form are Chelsea and Tottenham Hotspur in?
Over the last 5 games Chelsea have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Tottenham Hotspur 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur?
The statistical background for Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


