England - EFL League TwoData current as of 13 September 2026

Cheltenham Town vs Cambridge United: match statistics

Cheltenham Town vs Cambridge United: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cheltenham Town played Cambridge United in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 6 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Cheltenham Town: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Cambridge United: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cheltenham Town scores 1.10 and concedes 1.69 goals per match. Cambridge United scores 1.43 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cheltenham Town 51%, Cambridge United 48%. Over 2.5: Cheltenham Town 44%, Cambridge United 33%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Cambridge United has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.16. Cheltenham Town: 10.3 shots per match, Cambridge United: 11.5.

Match halves

Cheltenham Town: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.74. Cambridge United: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Cheltenham Town: 61-75 (13 goals). Cambridge United: 46-60 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League Two: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cambridge United are the favorites for this match: they sit 3rd in the table versus Cheltenham’s 19th and have scored 57 goals this season compared to the hosts’ 43. The visitors’ key advantage is defensively — Cambridge concede an average of 0.85 goals on the road, while Cheltenham concede 1.33 goals per home match; in the last five games the hosts have conceded 9 goals and the visitors only 2. Although Cheltenham attempts more shots at home (11.11 with 3.06 on target) than Cambridge do away (10.20 with 2.65 on target), the xG of both teams is almost identical (1.24 vs 1.23) and shot conversion rate is 11% for both, which suggests the home advantage is quantitative rather than qualitative. Cambridge also have better recent form: 1.6 points per game in their last 5 matches versus 1.0 for Cheltenham, more clean sheets away (40% vs 28%) and a superior goal difference (+5 away vs -2 for Cheltenham at home). Based on this, I predict a Cambridge win, with probabilities: away 55%, draw 25%, home 20%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back 'No Goal' in the BTTS market: 62% vs 38%. Cambridge have conceded only 2 goals in their last 5 matches (0.4 per game) and record just 20% BTTS in that period, a strong indicator of a clean sheet expected. Cheltenham create more chances — 12.85 shots and 4.55 shots on target per game, xG 1.55 and average 1.75 goals this season — but have also conceded 9 goals in their last 5 matches (1.8 per game), showing significant defensive vulnerability. This season Cambridge have conceded 30 goals versus 66 conceded by Cheltenham, and both teams have 40% of matches with a clean sheet, so overall the edge points to a scenario where at least one side fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Total xG is 1.55 (Cheltenham) + 1.23 (Cambridge) = 2.78, so expected total goals ≈ 2.78. Season metrics show Over 1.5 occurs frequently: 75% of Cheltenham’s matches and 70% of Cambridge’s matches finish above 1.5 goals; additionally Cheltenham averages 4.55 SOT with 14% conversion, and Cambridge 2.65 SOT with 11% conversion, increasing scoring probability. Poisson estimate with λ=2.78 yields ~77% chance of Over 1.5, ~53% for Over 2.5 and ~30% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Although season Over 2.5 rates are moderate (35% for Cheltenham and 30% for Cambridge), the last 5 matches show Cheltenham scoring 1.4 and conceding 1.8 per game, and Cambridge scoring 1.4 and conceding 0.4, which combined favors at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Seasonally Cheltenham has a clear offensive edge: they average 1.75 goals per game versus Cambridge’s average conceded 0.85, with the home side’s xG at 1.55 against 1.02 xG allowed by Cambridge’s defense. The hosts led at the break in 9 of 20 matches (45%) and keep a clean sheet at half-time in 80% of games, whereas Cambridge led at the break in 6 of 20 (30%) and have 65% HT clean sheets, which favors Cheltenham in the first half. After the break Cheltenham scores an average of 1.10 goals and scores at least once in the second half in 85% of matches, versus Cambridge’s 0.65 and 60%, and the hosts have scored 10 goals in minutes 46–60 compared to 3 for the visitors. Additionally Cheltenham averages 4.55 shots on target from 12.85 total shots, Cambridge have 2.65 on target from 10.2 total, and shot conversion is 14% vs 11%, which together with a 65% home win rate for the hosts versus 35% away for Cambridge gives a strong signal for a home win. Therefore the most likely scenario is Cheltenham leading at the break and winning at full-time (HT/FT 1/1), hence the selection of 1/1 as the highest probability outcome (38%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
3Shots11
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
0Shots on target4
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
0.5xG1.28
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
3Corners6
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
41Dangerous attacks42
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
13Fouls11
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
0Cards1
Cheltenham TownCambridge United

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Cheltenham TownCambridge United
1.1Goals scored / match1.43
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
1.69Goals conceded / match0.75
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
48%Average possession52%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
3.03Shots on target / match3.63
Cheltenham TownCambridge United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.26Shots per match11.53
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
3.03Shots on target3.63
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
10.8%Shot conversion12.4%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
48%Possession52%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
1.16xG for1.39
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
1.68xG against1
Cheltenham TownCambridge United

Shooting quality

Cheltenham Town: BalancedCambridge United: Balanced
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
Accuracy (shots on target)30%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cambridge United is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Cheltenham Town · 1.6 pts / match - Cambridge United

Cheltenham Town
DWDLL
Season result split
28% W23% D49% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-19
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-8
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Cambridge United
WDWLD
Season result split
50% W33% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
20-13-7
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-7-6
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 0.85BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cambridge United is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.1 goals / match - Cheltenham Town · 1.43 goals / match - Cambridge United

Cambridge United is 125% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.69 goals / match - Cheltenham Town · 0.75 goals / match - Cambridge United

Cheltenham Town scoring profile: strong

Cheltenham Town scores in 72% of matches (28 of 39 matches), while Cambridge United keeps a clean sheet in 40% (16 of 40 matches).

Cambridge United scoring profile: very strong

Cambridge United scores in 78% of matches (31 of 40 matches), while Cheltenham Town keeps a clean sheet in 23% (9 of 39 matches).

43Goals scored (season)57
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
66Goals conceded (season)30
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
2.79Average goals in match2.17
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
7Goals scored (last 5)7
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
9Goals conceded (last 5)2
Cheltenham TownCambridge United

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal78%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
31%2 goals43%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
8%3 goals15%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
0%4 goals5%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal60%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
49%2 goals13%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
21%3 goals3%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
10%4 goals0%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
Cambridge United - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.19 of 40 matches
51%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time13%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
8%BTTS in both halves3%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
15%Scored in both halves23%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
60%BTTS - last 520%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
62%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cambridge United is 82% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.85 pts / match - Cheltenham Town · 1.55 pts / match - Cambridge United

Cheltenham Town - half-time state
10% leading54% draw36% trailing
Cambridge United - half-time state
38% leading43% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.85Points per match (1st half)1.55
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.55
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
0.74Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
1.1Average goals (1st half)0.9
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
54%Clean sheet before half-time73%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
69%No goal before half-time53%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.7
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
0.74Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
0.95Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
1.69Average goals (2nd half)1.27
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
33%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United
44%No goal after half-time48%
Cheltenham TownCambridge United

Cheltenham Town - second-half results

26% W41% D33% L
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding280%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cambridge United - second-half results

45% W35% D20% L
62
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
68
Second-half points
+19
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cheltenham Town - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Cambridge United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cheltenham Town
ScoredConceded
4
11
0-15
4
8
16-30
6
10
31-45
7
12
46-60
13
12
61-75
9
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Cambridge United
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
12
7
31-45
13
5
46-60
9
6
61-75
13
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.49
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-60%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cheltenham Town

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Cambridge United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-21.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

Cheltenham TownLigaCambridge United
Average goals in match 2.792.53 2.17
Both teams scored 51%51% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%46% 33%
Clean sheets 23%27% 40%
Goal before half-time 56%66% 63%
Goal after half-time 90%78% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Cambridge UnitedGoalSulaiman Borbor KaikaiAssist: Mamadou Jobe
  2. Cambridge UnitedYellow cardDominic Ball
  3. Cheltenham TownSubstitutionOn: Luke YoungOff: Ben Stevenson
  4. Cheltenham TownSubstitutionOn: Mo FaalOff: Josh Davison
  5. Cheltenham TownSubstitutionOn: Ryan James BroomOff: Jake Bickerstaff
  6. Cambridge UnitedSubstitutionOn: Michael MorrisonOff: Adam Major
  7. Cambridge UnitedSubstitutionOn: Elliot NevittOff: Pelly Ruddock Mpanzu
  8. Cambridge UnitedGoalJake Eastwood

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Cheltenham Town 0 - 0 - 1 Cambridge United. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Cambridge United FC
1 : 0
Cheltenham Town FC

FAQ

What was the result of Cheltenham Town vs Cambridge United?

The EFL League Two match finished Cheltenham Town 1:1 Cambridge United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Cheltenham Town vs Cambridge United?

Cheltenham Town score 1.10 goals per game on average and Cambridge United 1.43. The EFL League Two average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 51% of Cheltenham Town's matches and 48% of Cambridge United's.

What form are Cheltenham Town and Cambridge United in?

Over the last 5 games Cheltenham Town have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Cambridge United 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheltenham Town vs Cambridge United?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.