Cheltenham Town vs Cambridge United: match statistics
Cheltenham Town vs Cambridge United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cheltenham Town played Cambridge United in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 6 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Cheltenham Town: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Cambridge United: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cheltenham Town scores 1.10 and concedes 1.69 goals per match. Cambridge United scores 1.43 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.53 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cheltenham Town 51%, Cambridge United 48%. Over 2.5: Cheltenham Town 44%, Cambridge United 33%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Cambridge United has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.16. Cheltenham Town: 10.3 shots per match, Cambridge United: 11.5.
Match halves
Cheltenham Town: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.74. Cambridge United: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.88.
Goals by minute
Cheltenham Town: 61-75 (13 goals). Cambridge United: 46-60 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League Two: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cambridge United are the favorites for this match: they sit 3rd in the table versus Cheltenham’s 19th and have scored 57 goals this season compared to the hosts’ 43. The visitors’ key advantage is defensively — Cambridge concede an average of 0.85 goals on the road, while Cheltenham concede 1.33 goals per home match; in the last five games the hosts have conceded 9 goals and the visitors only 2. Although Cheltenham attempts more shots at home (11.11 with 3.06 on target) than Cambridge do away (10.20 with 2.65 on target), the xG of both teams is almost identical (1.24 vs 1.23) and shot conversion rate is 11% for both, which suggests the home advantage is quantitative rather than qualitative. Cambridge also have better recent form: 1.6 points per game in their last 5 matches versus 1.0 for Cheltenham, more clean sheets away (40% vs 28%) and a superior goal difference (+5 away vs -2 for Cheltenham at home). Based on this, I predict a Cambridge win, with probabilities: away 55%, draw 25%, home 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back 'No Goal' in the BTTS market: 62% vs 38%. Cambridge have conceded only 2 goals in their last 5 matches (0.4 per game) and record just 20% BTTS in that period, a strong indicator of a clean sheet expected. Cheltenham create more chances — 12.85 shots and 4.55 shots on target per game, xG 1.55 and average 1.75 goals this season — but have also conceded 9 goals in their last 5 matches (1.8 per game), showing significant defensive vulnerability. This season Cambridge have conceded 30 goals versus 66 conceded by Cheltenham, and both teams have 40% of matches with a clean sheet, so overall the edge points to a scenario where at least one side fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Total xG is 1.55 (Cheltenham) + 1.23 (Cambridge) = 2.78, so expected total goals ≈ 2.78. Season metrics show Over 1.5 occurs frequently: 75% of Cheltenham’s matches and 70% of Cambridge’s matches finish above 1.5 goals; additionally Cheltenham averages 4.55 SOT with 14% conversion, and Cambridge 2.65 SOT with 11% conversion, increasing scoring probability. Poisson estimate with λ=2.78 yields ~77% chance of Over 1.5, ~53% for Over 2.5 and ~30% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Although season Over 2.5 rates are moderate (35% for Cheltenham and 30% for Cambridge), the last 5 matches show Cheltenham scoring 1.4 and conceding 1.8 per game, and Cambridge scoring 1.4 and conceding 0.4, which combined favors at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonally Cheltenham has a clear offensive edge: they average 1.75 goals per game versus Cambridge’s average conceded 0.85, with the home side’s xG at 1.55 against 1.02 xG allowed by Cambridge’s defense. The hosts led at the break in 9 of 20 matches (45%) and keep a clean sheet at half-time in 80% of games, whereas Cambridge led at the break in 6 of 20 (30%) and have 65% HT clean sheets, which favors Cheltenham in the first half. After the break Cheltenham scores an average of 1.10 goals and scores at least once in the second half in 85% of matches, versus Cambridge’s 0.65 and 60%, and the hosts have scored 10 goals in minutes 46–60 compared to 3 for the visitors. Additionally Cheltenham averages 4.55 shots on target from 12.85 total shots, Cambridge have 2.65 on target from 10.2 total, and shot conversion is 14% vs 11%, which together with a 65% home win rate for the hosts versus 35% away for Cambridge gives a strong signal for a home win. Therefore the most likely scenario is Cheltenham leading at the break and winning at full-time (HT/FT 1/1), hence the selection of 1/1 as the highest probability outcome (38%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cheltenham Town | Cambridge United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cambridge United is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Cheltenham Town · 1.6 pts / match - Cambridge United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cambridge United is 30% better for: goals scored per match.
1.1 goals / match - Cheltenham Town · 1.43 goals / match - Cambridge United
Cambridge United is 125% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.69 goals / match - Cheltenham Town · 0.75 goals / match - Cambridge United
Cheltenham Town scores in 72% of matches (28 of 39 matches), while Cambridge United keeps a clean sheet in 40% (16 of 40 matches).
Cambridge United scores in 78% of matches (31 of 40 matches), while Cheltenham Town keeps a clean sheet in 23% (9 of 39 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cheltenham Town
Over / Under - Cambridge United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cambridge United is 82% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.85 pts / match - Cheltenham Town · 1.55 pts / match - Cambridge United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cheltenham Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cambridge United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cheltenham Town
Cambridge United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Cheltenham Town | Liga | Cambridge United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.79 | 2.53 | ▼ 2.17 |
| Both teams scored | • 51% | 51% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 46% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 27% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 66% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 78% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Cheltenham Town 0 - 0 - 1 Cambridge United. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cheltenham Town vs Cambridge United?
The EFL League Two match finished Cheltenham Town 1:1 Cambridge United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cheltenham Town vs Cambridge United?
Cheltenham Town score 1.10 goals per game on average and Cambridge United 1.43. The EFL League Two average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 51% of Cheltenham Town's matches and 48% of Cambridge United's.
What form are Cheltenham Town and Cambridge United in?
Over the last 5 games Cheltenham Town have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Cambridge United 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheltenham Town vs Cambridge United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


