Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Youth Island: match statistics
Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Youth Island: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chengdu Better City FC played Qingdao Youth Island in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 3 April 2026. Final score: 5:1.
Current form
Chengdu Better City FC: 2-1-0, 2.33 points/match. Qingdao Youth Island: 1-0-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chengdu Better City FC scores 3.00 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Qingdao Youth Island scores 0.67 and concedes 2.00. League average: 3.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chengdu Better City FC 67%, Qingdao Youth Island 33%. Over 2.5: Chengdu Better City FC 67%, Qingdao Youth Island 33%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Chengdu Better City FC has higher xG: 2.22 vs 1.42. Chengdu Better City FC: 19.0 shots per match, Qingdao Youth Island: 14.0.
Match halves
Chengdu Better City FC: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 1.33. Qingdao Youth Island: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Chengdu Better City FC: 31-45+ (3 goals). Qingdao Youth Island: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 3.04 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chengdu Better City holds a clear home advantage: 100% home wins, averaging 3.0 goals scored and only 0.5 conceded per match, with two recent home victories (ww). Qingdao Youth Island struggle away — 100% defeats, averaging 0.5 goals scored and 3.0 conceded per match and 50% of away games without scoring. The gap in chance creation is significant: Chengdu averages 22.5 shots (8.0 on target) and xG 2.58, while the visitors average 13.5 shots (3.5 on target) and xG 1.34. Match control is reinforced by 70% possession versus 37% and a higher shot efficiency — conversion 13% versus Qingdao’s 4% — indicating the hosts will create and convert more opportunities. Based on these figures I expect a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis favors the "BTTS - No" scenario: Chengdu as home side has a seasonal average of 0.0 goals conceded and 100% clean sheets in home matches, with a seasonal BTTS rate of 0%. Qingdao possesses very limited offensive firepower — seasonal goals scored average 0.5 (2 goals this season) and only 3 goals in the last 5 matches (0.6 per match). Although Chengdu conceded 8 goals in their last 5 games (1.6 per match) and recorded 60% BTTS in that period, xG still favors the hosts (home xG 1.59 vs xG against 1.21) while the visitors post xG_for 1.34 with lower conversion (4% vs 7%) and fewer shots on target (3.5 vs 5.0). The visitors also concede heavily over the season (3.0 conceded per match, 6 goals total), but poor finishing limits realistic chances to breach the hosts' defense. Defensive signals and low visitor efficiency dominate, therefore I pick "No" with a 75% probability vs 25% for "Yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate Chengdu will score about 1.67 goals and Qingdao about 1.34 goals, totaling 3.01 goals. This results from averaging xG: the home side has xG_for 1.59 and the opponent concedes on average 1.90, with the last 5 matches showing 1.68 and 1.50, which together give ~1.67; for the visitors xG_for 1.34 against the home xG_against 1.21 (last 5: 1.57 and 1.24) yields ~1.34. The hosts average 15 shots and 5 on target with a conversion rate of 7%, the visitors 13.5 shots and 3.5 on target with a 4% conversion, and in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 11 goals (2.2 avg) versus 3 goals (0.6) for the visitors, which reinforces the home advantage. With a league average of 3.04 goals per match and our expectation of 3.01, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (high probability), Over 2.5 looks moderately likely (around 68%), and Over 3.5 is less certain (around 38%). Therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the primary play, since the xG edge and the hosts’ shot stats increase the chance of at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal statistics show Chengdu were level at the break in 100% of matches and average 0.0 goals by half-time, strongly indicating a draw at 45 minutes. In the second half the hosts score on average 1.0 goal and find the net in 100% of games after the break, while Qingdao concedes an average of 2.0 goals after half-time and a season total of 3.0 goals conceded, indicating significant vulnerability from the visitors after the break. Additionally, Chengdu have a 100% win rate and an average of 3.0 points per match, whereas Qingdao have a 0% win rate and 0.0 points per match; expected goals (xG) are 1.59 for the hosts versus 1.34 for the visitors, which corroborates Chengdu’s advantage. For these reasons the strongest signal is a Half-Time/Full-Time draw at half-time and home win at full-time (X/1), and I therefore assign the highest probability to that scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chengdu Better City FC | Qingdao Youth Island | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.17 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chengdu Better City FC is 133% better for: last-5 form.
2.33 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1 pts / match - Qingdao Youth Island
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chengdu Better City FC is 348% better for: goals scored per match.
3 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 0.67 goals / match - Qingdao Youth Island
Chengdu Better City FC is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.33 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 2 goals / match - Qingdao Youth Island
Chengdu Better City FC scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Qingdao Youth Island keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).
Qingdao Youth Island scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Chengdu Better City FC keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chengdu Better City FC
Over / Under - Qingdao Youth Island
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chengdu Better City FC is 248% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.33 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 0.67 pts / match - Qingdao Youth Island
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chengdu Better City FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Qingdao Youth Island - second-half results
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.33 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.3 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 67% |
| No goal | 33% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.67 | 1.33 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.7 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.7 | 1.3 |
| Average goals in match | 0.7 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 33% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 67% |
| No goal | 100% | 33% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chengdu Better City FC
Qingdao Youth Island
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Chengdu Better City FC | Liga | Qingdao Youth Island | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.33 | 3.04 | ▼ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 54% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 54% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 25% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 63% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 88% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Chengdu Better City FC 0 - 2 - 0 Qingdao Youth Island. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Youth Island?
The Chinese Super League match finished Chengdu Better City FC 5:1 Qingdao Youth Island. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City FC and Qingdao Youth Island?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chengdu Better City FC won 0, Qingdao Youth Island won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Youth Island?
Chengdu Better City FC score 3.00 goals per game on average and Qingdao Youth Island 0.67. The Chinese Super League average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Chengdu Better City FC's matches and 33% of Qingdao Youth Island's.
What form are Chengdu Better City FC and Qingdao Youth Island in?
Over the last 5 games Chengdu Better City FC have a 2-1-0 record (2.33 points per game) and Qingdao Youth Island 1-0-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chengdu Better City FC vs Qingdao Youth Island?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


