China - Chinese Super LeagueDujiangyan Sports Center StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Chengdu Better City FC vs Shanghai SIPG: match statistics

Chengdu Better City FC vs Shanghai SIPG: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chengdu Better City FC play Shanghai SIPG in Chinese Super League (China). The match date is 19 May 2026 at 14:00. Venue: Dujiangyan Sports Center Stadium. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Chengdu Better City FC: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Shanghai SIPG: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chengdu Better City FC scores 2.05 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. Shanghai SIPG scores 1.56 and concedes 1.44. League average: 3.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chengdu Better City FC 58%, Shanghai SIPG 78%. Over 2.5: Chengdu Better City FC 53%, Shanghai SIPG 67%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Chengdu Better City FC has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.33. Chengdu Better City FC: 14.8 shots per match, Shanghai SIPG: 10.9.

Match halves

Chengdu Better City FC: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.21. Shanghai SIPG: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Chengdu Better City FC: 76-90+ (15 goals). Shanghai SIPG: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Chinese Super League: 3.09 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Chengdu Better City FC are clear favorites: at home they have 11 wins and 0 losses (100% win rate), average 3.33 goals scored per match and concede only 0.5, and in the last five appearances they have 5 wins and 13 goals scored. Shanghai SIPG perform poorly away — no away wins (0% wins), suffer 60% away defeats, average 0.8 goals per match, register 2.2 shots on target and fail to score in 40% of away games. xG values corroborate the home advantage: Chengdu generates on average xG 2.06 at home and concedes xG 1.10, while Shanghai posts xG 0.99 away and faces xG against 1.53, suggesting more high-quality chances for the hosts and greater vulnerability for the visitors. Additionally Chengdu averages 7.17 shots on target at home with a 19% conversion rate, whereas the visitors have only 2.2 shots on target and 10% conversion, which increases the hosts’ scoring probability. Considering the advantage in average goals (3.33 vs 0.8), shots on target (7.17 vs 2.2), xG (2.06 vs 0.99) and Shanghai’s lack of away wins, I predict a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
18Shots3
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
6Shots on target1
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
1.99xG0.49
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
6Corners2
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
61Dangerous attacks29
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
8Fouls21
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
3Cards8
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
2.05Goals scored / match1.56
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
0.95Goals conceded / match1.44
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
57%Average possession58%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
5.11Shots on target / match3.61
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.79Shots per match10.89
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
5.11Shots on target3.61
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
13.9%Shot conversion14.3%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
57%Possession58%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
1.72xG for1.33
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
1.16xG against1.29
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

Shooting quality

Chengdu Better City FC: DominantShanghai SIPG: Efficient finishing
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chengdu Better City FC is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG

Chengdu Better City FC
WWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
68% W21% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-2
2.26 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
Shanghai SIPG
DLWLD
Season result split
28% W33% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-7
1.17 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chengdu Better City FC is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

2.05 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.56 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG

Chengdu Better City FC is 52% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.95 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.44 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG

Chengdu Better City FC scoring profile: very strong

Chengdu Better City FC scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while Shanghai SIPG keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).

Shanghai SIPG scoring profile: very strong

Shanghai SIPG scores in 89% of matches (16 of 18 matches), while Chengdu Better City FC keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).

39Goals scored (season)28
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
18Goals conceded (season)26
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
3Average goals in match3
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
7Goals scored (last 5)8
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal89%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
53%2 goals44%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
37%3 goals11%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
16%4 goals11%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal89%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
21%2 goals44%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
5%3 goals11%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
0%4 goals0%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
Chengdu Better City FC - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 19 matches
65%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time22%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
0%BTTS in both halves11%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
42%Scored in both halves33%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS61%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
80%BTTS - last 5100%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time61%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chengdu Better City FC is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.68 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.39 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG

Chengdu Better City FC - half-time state
42% leading42% draw16% trailing
Shanghai SIPG - half-time state
28% leading56% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.68Points per match (1st half)1.39
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
0.84Goals scored (1st half)0.56
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
0.32Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
1.16Average goals (1st half)1
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
74%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
47%No goal before half-time50%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

After half-time (2nd half)

2.05Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
1.21Goals scored (2nd half)1
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
1.84Average goals (2nd half)2
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
58%Clean sheet after half-time28%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG
21%No goal after half-time28%
Chengdu Better City FCShanghai SIPG

Chengdu Better City FC - second-half results

63% W16% R21% P
32
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.68
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shanghai SIPG - second-half results

28% W28% R44% P
25
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chengdu Better City FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Shanghai SIPG - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chengdu Better City FC
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
8
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
4
4
61-75
15
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Shanghai SIPG
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
3
2
16-30
6
1
31-45
7
6
46-60
4
6
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
79%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chengdu Better City FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Shanghai SIPG

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).

Teams vs league

Chengdu Better City FCLigaShanghai SIPG
Average goals in match 3.003.09 3.00
Both teams scored 58%65% 78%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%59% 67%
Clean sheets 32%19% 11%
Goal before half-time 63%70% 61%
Goal after half-time 95%89% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.09
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.80
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Chengdu Better City FC 2 - 0 - 0 Shanghai SIPG. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Chengdu Better City FC
4 : 1
Shanghai SIPG FC
Shanghai SIPG FC
1 : 3
Chengdu Better City FC

FAQ

What was the result of Chengdu Better City FC vs Shanghai SIPG?

The Chinese Super League match finished Chengdu Better City FC 0:1 Shanghai SIPG. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City FC and Shanghai SIPG?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chengdu Better City FC won 2, Shanghai SIPG won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chengdu Better City FC vs Shanghai SIPG?

Chengdu Better City FC score 2.05 goals per game on average and Shanghai SIPG 1.56. The Chinese Super League average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Chengdu Better City FC's matches and 78% of Shanghai SIPG's.

What form are Chengdu Better City FC and Shanghai SIPG in?

Over the last 5 games Chengdu Better City FC have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Shanghai SIPG 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chengdu Better City FC vs Shanghai SIPG?

The statistical background for Chengdu Better City FC vs Shanghai SIPG — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.