China - Chinese Super LeagueDujiangyan Sports Center StadiumData current as of 15 October 2026

Chengdu Better City FC vs Tianjin Teda: match statistics

Chengdu Better City FC vs Tianjin Teda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chengdu Better City FC played Tianjin Teda in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: Dujiangyan Sports Center Stadium. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Chengdu Better City FC: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Tianjin Teda: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chengdu Better City FC scores 1.96 and concedes 1.15 goals per match. Tianjin Teda scores 1.38 and concedes 1.23. League average: 3.11 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chengdu Better City FC 62%, Tianjin Teda 58%. Over 2.5: Chengdu Better City FC 54%, Tianjin Teda 50%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 58%.

xG, shots and style

Chengdu Better City FC has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.18. Chengdu Better City FC: 15.3 shots per match, Tianjin Teda: 11.0.

Match halves

Chengdu Better City FC: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.19. Tianjin Teda: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.92.

Goals by minute

Chengdu Better City FC: 76-90+ (21 goals). Tianjin Teda: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Chinese Super League: 3.11 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 58%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chengdu Better City FC sit 1st in the table and have won 62% of their home matches, while Tianjin Teda are 13th and have won 33% of their away games. At home, Chengdu average 2.38 goals with an xG of 2.04, while Tianjin score 1.25 goals on the road with an xG of 1.09. Chengdu’s edge in chance creation is also reflected in their 6.85 shots on target per match compared with Tianjin’s 3.42. However, caution is warranted: the hosts have won only two of their last five matches and conceded 9 goals, while the visitors have suffered one defeat and conceded 6. Despite Tianjin’s slightly better recent run, Chengdu’s greater attacking strength at home points to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS occurred in 71% of Chengdu’s matches, but in only 42% of Tianjin’s, so the season data is inconclusive. However, recent form points towards both teams scoring: BTTS landed in 60% of each team’s last five matches, while Chengdu conceded an average of 1.8 goals compared with Tianjin’s 1.2. The hosts score an average of 1.5 goals per match and failed to score in just 7% of their games, increasing the likelihood that they will find the net. The greater risk to a BTTS - Yes pick lies with the visitors, who failed to score in 33% of their matches; nevertheless, Chengdu’s average of 1.43 goals conceded and Tianjin’s xG of 1.09 provide grounds to expect them to score as well.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: this outcome occurred in 71% of Chengdu’s matches and as many as 92% of Tianjin’s. The hosts average 1.5 goals per match, while the visitors concede 1.0, which points to Chengdu finding the net but not to an exceptionally high-scoring game. Tianjin average 1.25 goals, but failed to score in 33% of their matches, making their contribution to the total less reliable. The expected 2.67 goals and the clear gap between the share of matches with Over 2.5 goals for Chengdu (64%) and Tianjin (33%) indicate that the 3.5 line offers a safer signal than the 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: Tianjin went into the break level in 67% of matches, compared with 43% for Chengdu. The visitors concede an average of just 0.17 goals in the first half, while the hosts score 0.50, limiting the chances of Chengdu taking an early lead. The hosts could have a greater advantage after the break: they average 1.00 goals in the second half, compared with Tianjin’s 0.83, and also average 4.00 shots on target per match overall, against 3.42 for the visitors. Another argument in favour of a Chengdu win is that they allow opponents chances worth a total xG of 1.37, compared with Tianjin’s 1.78. However, X/1 is not a clear favourite, as Tianjin have conceded an average of just 0.40 goals after the break across their last five matches, making a full-time draw a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

70Possession (%)30
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
3Shots3
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
0Shots on target1
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
0.58xG0.49
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
4Corners1
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
49Dangerous attacks31
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
7Fouls6
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
0Cards0
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
1.96Goals scored / match1.38
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
1.15Goals conceded / match1.23
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
55%Average possession43%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
5.08Shots on target / match3.73
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.31Shots per match11.04
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
5.08Shots on target3.73
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
12.8%Shot conversion12.5%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
55%Possession43%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
1.73xG for1.18
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
1.23xG against1.56
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda

Shooting quality

Chengdu Better City FC: DominantTianjin Teda: Counter-attacking
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
Accuracy (shots on target)33%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tianjin Teda is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.6 pts / match - Tianjin Teda

Chengdu Better City FC
LWLWD
Season result split
58% W27% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-7-4
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Tianjin Teda
LDDWW
Season result split
35% W31% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-9
1.35 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chengdu Better City FC is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

1.96 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.38 goals / match - Tianjin Teda

Chengdu Better City FC is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.15 goals / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.23 goals / match - Tianjin Teda

Chengdu Better City FC scoring profile: very strong

Chengdu Better City FC scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Tianjin Teda keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 matches).

Tianjin Teda scoring profile: very strong

Tianjin Teda scores in 81% of matches (21 of 26 matches), while Chengdu Better City FC keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).

51Goals scored (season)36
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
30Goals conceded (season)32
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
3.12Average goals in match2.62
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
9Goals scored (last 5)6
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
9Goals conceded (last 5)6
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal81%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
54%2 goals38%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
35%3 goals15%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
15%4 goals4%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal69%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
27%2 goals38%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
8%3 goals12%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
4%4 goals4%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
Chengdu Better City FC - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 26 matches
64%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time15%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
4%BTTS in both halves4%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
42%Scored in both halves23%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
60%BTTS - last 560%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chengdu Better City FC is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.62 pts / match - Chengdu Better City FC · 1.35 pts / match - Tianjin Teda

Chengdu Better City FC - half-time state
38% leading46% draw15% trailing
Tianjin Teda - half-time state
27% leading54% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.62Points per match (1st half)1.35
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
0.77Goals scored (1st half)0.46
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
1.12Average goals (1st half)0.85
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
73%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
50%No goal before half-time58%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda

After half-time (2nd half)

1.77Points per match (2nd half)1.27
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
1.19Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
2Average goals (2nd half)1.77
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
50%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda
23%No goal after half-time38%
Chengdu Better City FCTianjin Teda

Chengdu Better City FC - second-half results

50% W27% D23% L
42
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tianjin Teda - second-half results

27% W46% D27% L
35
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chengdu Better City FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Tianjin Teda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chengdu Better City FC
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
6
4
16-30
10
2
31-45
5
6
46-60
5
8
61-75
21
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (21 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.

Tianjin Teda
ScoredConceded
5
0
0-15
1
4
16-30
6
6
31-45
3
7
46-60
4
4
61-75
17
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.86
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chengdu Better City FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

Tianjin Teda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
47% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
47%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).

Teams vs league

Chengdu Better City FCLigaTianjin Teda
Average goals in match• 3.123.11▼ 2.62
Both teams scored▼ 62%64%▼ 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 54%58%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 27%20%▲ 31%
Goal before half-time▼ 58%72%▼ 62%
Goal after half-time▲ 92%87%▼ 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.11
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.77
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tianjin TedaSubstitutionOn: Guilherme Schettine GuimarãesOff: Qiuming Wang
  2. Tianjin TedaSubstitutionOn: Jiahui HuangOff: Zhexuan Chen
  3. Tianjin TedaSubstitutionOn: Dun BaOff: Zhenghao Wang
  4. Chengdu Better City FCSubstitutionOn: Rongxiang LiaoOff: Yiran He
  5. Chengdu Better City FCSubstitutionOn: Mutellip IminqariOff: Wellington Alves da Silva
  6. Chengdu Better City FCSubstitutionOn: Alexander Christian JojoOff: Dongsheng Wang
  7. Tianjin TedaGoalAlberto Quiles PiosaAssist: Ming Him Sun

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Chengdu Better City FC 1 - 0 - 2 Tianjin Teda. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Tianjin Teda
1 : 2
Chengdu Better City FC
Tianjin Teda FC
2 : 1
Chengdu Better City FC
Chengdu Better City FC
1 : 2
Tianjin Teda FC

FAQ

What was the result of Chengdu Better City FC vs Tianjin Teda?

The Chinese Super League match finished Chengdu Better City FC 0:1 Tianjin Teda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City FC and Tianjin Teda?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Chengdu Better City FC won 1, Tianjin Teda won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chengdu Better City FC vs Tianjin Teda?

Chengdu Better City FC score 1.96 goals per game on average and Tianjin Teda 1.38. The Chinese Super League average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Chengdu Better City FC's matches and 58% of Tianjin Teda's.

What form are Chengdu Better City FC and Tianjin Teda in?

Over the last 5 games Chengdu Better City FC have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Tianjin Teda 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chengdu Better City FC vs Tianjin Teda?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.