Cheonan City vs Cheongju: match statistics
Cheonan City vs Cheongju: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cheonan City played Cheongju in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Cheonan City: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Cheongju: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cheonan City scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Cheongju scores 1.17 and concedes 1.83. League average: 2.92 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cheonan City 40%, Cheongju 83%. Over 2.5: Cheonan City 40%, Cheongju 67%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.
xG, shots and style
Cheonan City has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.31. Cheonan City: 12.0 shots per match, Cheongju: 11.7.
Match halves
Cheonan City: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.40. Cheongju: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Cheonan City: 31-45+ (2 goals). Cheongju: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw due to a strong mutual points-splitting trend: Cheonan have 3 draws in their last 5 matches (dlddw), while Cheongju recorded 4 draws in their last 5 (dddld). The hosts show clear defensive superiority at home — conceding only 0.33 goals per game and keeping clean sheets in 67% of matches, whereas the visitors concede 1.33 goals on the road with a 33% clean sheet rate. Cheonan’s poor offensive efficiency is crucial: only 0.33 goals per game at home and 67% of matches without scoring, with a conversion rate around 3%, while Cheongju averages 1.33 goals away with a 15% conversion and 3.33 shots on target. xG indicates the hosts create more (xG 1.25 at home vs. visitors’ 1.06 xG away), but chances are not being converted into goals, increasing the likelihood of a low-scoring outcome. Considering the hosts’ better recent form (1.2 points per game in the last 5 vs. 0.8 for the visitors) and the high share of draws, I assign probabilities: draw 50%, home win 30%, away win 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS comes from season-long indicators: Cheonan has BTTS at 100% this season, Cheongju 67%, and the league averages 65% of matches with both teams scoring. The home side concedes 2.33 goals per game at home on average, while opponents score 1.33 goals per game this season; concurrently Cheonan produces xG 1.56 versus Cheongju’s xG against 1.06, suggesting both sides have a realistic chance to score. Additionally Cheonan has no clean sheets (0%), whereas Cheongju has 33% of matches without conceding; in the last 5 fixtures BTTS was 40% for Cheonan and 80% for Cheongju, and goals per game over the last 5 matches are 1.0–1.2 (scored) and 1.0–1.4 (conceded). The league averages 2.94 goals per match, and both teams register simultaneous over 2.5 goals and BTTS in 67% of cases, which further supports a both-teams-to-score scenario. Based on this I forecast an 80% probability for BTTS - Yes and 20% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis points to approximately 2.45 goals: Cheonan has xG_for 1.56 versus Cheongju’s xG_against 1.06, implying ~1.31 goals for the home side, while Cheongju’s xG_for 1.06 versus Cheonan’s xG_against 1.21 implies ~1.14 away goals (total 2.45). Cheonan averages 14.67 shots and 4.0 on target, Cheongju 8.67 and 3.33; Cheonan creates more chances but posts a lower conversion rate (7% vs 15% for Cheongju), and the BTTS rate is 100% for Cheonan and 67% for Cheongju, which supports goals from both sides. Historically 100% of Cheonan’s home matches and 67% of Cheongju’s matches exceeded 1.5 goals, so I give Over 1.5 a strong priority (88%). The 2.5 line is more balanced: both teams sit on 67% Over 2.5 seasonally and the league records 63% Over 2.5, but the predicted total xG of 2.45 is slightly below 2.5, hence a moderate stance on Over 2.5 (58%). For 3.5 the signals favor the under: the league averages 2.94 goals and our xG 2.45 is well below 3.5, and the home side has only 33% of matches above 3.5 (away 67%), so I rate Under 3.5 at 72%. Recommendation: play Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X). Cheongju has drawn all of their matches this season (100% draws), and in the last five fixtures home teams have drawn 60% while away teams have drawn 80%, which strongly favors a final result of a draw. Both teams frequently score and concede: the home side have 100% of matches with both teams scoring, the visitors 67%, with home xG at 1.56 versus 1.06 for the visitors; however, shot conversion is better for the visitors (15% vs 7%), which evens the chances and supports a 1-1 scoreline. In the second half the visitors average 1.0 goals scored while the home side concede on average 1.33, increasing the likelihood of an equalizer after the break rather than a defeat for the visitors; therefore HT/FT — draw at the break and draw at the end — appears the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cheonan City | Cheongju | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cheonan City is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Cheonan City · 0.8 pts / match - Cheongju
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cheongju is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Cheonan City · 1.17 goals / match - Cheongju
Cheonan City is 83% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Cheonan City · 1.83 goals / match - Cheongju
Cheonan City scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
Cheongju scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Cheonan City keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cheonan City
Over / Under - Cheongju
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cheonan City is 260% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.8 pts / match - Cheonan City · 0.5 pts / match - Cheongju
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cheonan City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cheongju - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cheonan City
Cheongju
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Cheonan City | Liga | Cheongju | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.00 | 2.92 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 63% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 62% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 22% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 85% | ▼ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 69% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Cheonan City 1 - 0 - 2 Cheongju. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cheonan City vs Cheongju?
The K League 2 match finished Cheonan City 2:2 Cheongju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cheonan City and Cheongju?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cheonan City won 1, Cheongju won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cheonan City vs Cheongju?
Cheonan City score 1.00 goals per game on average and Cheongju 1.17. The K League 2 average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Cheonan City's matches and 83% of Cheongju's.
What form are Cheonan City and Cheongju in?
Over the last 5 games Cheonan City have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Cheongju 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheonan City vs Cheongju?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Cheonan City vs Cheongju: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.