Cheonan City vs Seongnam: match statistics
Cheonan City vs Seongnam: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cheonan City played Seongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Cheonan City: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Seongnam: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cheonan City scores 1.29 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Seongnam scores 1.14 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.88 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cheonan City 57%, Seongnam 57%. Over 2.5: Cheonan City 57%, Seongnam 43%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Seongnam has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.43. Cheonan City: 12.0 shots per match, Seongnam: 10.4.
Match halves
Cheonan City: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.86. Seongnam: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.29.
Goals by minute
Cheonan City: 76-90+ (4 goals). Seongnam: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.88 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Seongnam holds a clear offensive edge away — averaging 2.0 goals per match with 7 shots and 29% conversion, whereas Cheonan at home scores only 0.75 goals with 11 shots and 7% conversion, despite similar shots on target per game (2.5). The visitors have scored in every away fixture (0% home games without a goal), while the hosts failed to score in 50% of their home matches, which significantly increases Seongnam’s chance of netting at least once. Cheonan, however, shows better short-term form — 1.8 points per game over the last 5 matches versus Seongnam’s 1.4 — and keeps 50% clean sheets at home, but their home xG (1.3) is lower than xG against (1.57), suggesting they create chances but struggle to finish them. Seongnam’s away xG for is 1.0 and xG against 1.31, yet they actually score 2.0 and concede 1.0, meaning they convert chances efficiently; therefore, considering 29% vs 7% conversion and no away matches without scoring, I tip the visitors to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I forecast BTTS - Yes, because Seongnam has a seasonal rate of matches with both teams scoring at 100%, while the league records 63% BTTS, providing a strong goal-friendly context. Seongnam scores on average 2.0 goals per game and Cheonan concedes 1.0 on average, so the opponent shows clear scoring capability (2.0 vs 1.0); additionally Seongnam demonstrates high efficiency — shot conversion 29% versus Cheonan’s mere 7%. Cheonan’s seasonal home goals average is 0.8, but home xG is 1.65 and in the last 5 matches they scored 1.4 goals on average with 11.8 shots and 3.8 on target, indicating they create chances and have a real opportunity to score. Defensive signals confirm this: Seongnam has 0% clean sheets this season, Cheonan 20%, and over the last 5 matches both teams conceded around 1.0 goal on average (Cheonan 1.0, Seongnam 0.8), which combined with the league average goals of 2.81 increases BTTS probability. Taking this into account, I assess BTTS probability at roughly 80% versus 20% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Estimated xG indicates 1.48 expected goals for Cheonan (attack xG 1.65 and xG conceded vs Seongnam 1.31) and 1.04 for Seongnam (attack xG 1.00 and xG conceded vs Cheonan 1.08), total 2.52 goals. The 2.52 total is close to the league average of 2.81 and aligns with Seongnam averaging 2.0 goals per match and having 100% of matches with more than 1.5 goals. Cheonan produces more shots (11.8 vs 7.0) and more shots on target (3.8 vs 2.5) but has low conversion (7% vs Seongnam’s 29%), explaining the divergence between xG and actual returns of 0.8 vs 2.0. With lambda=2.52, a Poisson distribution yields about a 72% chance of Over 1.5, 46% for Over 2.5 and 25% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5. I recommend betting Over 1.5 — expected goals 2.52 and Seongnam’s stats (2.0 goals per match, 100% >1.5) reduce the risk of this selection.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seongnam are clear offensive favorites: they score an average of 2.0 goals per game versus Cheonan’s 0.8 and win 50% of matches compared to the home side’s 20% wins, indicating an away advantage. The visitors lead at the break in 50% of games and average 1.5 goals by half-time versus the hosts’ 0.6, so a Seongnam lead after 45 minutes is the most likely scenario. Cheonan generate higher xG (1.65 vs 1.0) and more shots (11.8 vs 7.0), but their conversion rate is only 7% versus Seongnam’s 29% (11.8*0.07≈0.8 vs 7.0*0.29≈2.0), which reduces the threat posed by the greater volume of attempts. Additionally, Seongnam have 0% clean sheets and 100% of matches with both teams scoring, so an away win may still involve them conceding. On that basis I select 2/2 with an estimated probability of 32%, with alternatives X/2 at 15% and X/X at 9% as less likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cheonan City | Seongnam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cheonan City is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Cheonan City · 1.4 pts / match - Seongnam
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cheonan City is 13% better for: goals scored per match.
1.29 goals / match - Cheonan City · 1.14 goals / match - Seongnam
Seongnam is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.14 goals / match - Cheonan City · 1 goals / match - Seongnam
Cheonan City scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).
Seongnam scores in 57% of matches (4 of 7 matches), while Cheonan City keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cheonan City
Over / Under - Seongnam
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Seongnam is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / match - Cheonan City · 1.71 pts / match - Seongnam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cheonan City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Seongnam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cheonan City
Seongnam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Cheonan City | Liga | Seongnam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.43 | 2.88 | ▼ 2.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 64% | ▼ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 57% | 59% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 21% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 80% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 74% | ▼ 57% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Cheonan City 0 - 2 - 1 Seongnam. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cheonan City vs Seongnam?
The K League 2 match finished Cheonan City 1:1 Seongnam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cheonan City and Seongnam?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cheonan City won 0, Seongnam won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cheonan City vs Seongnam?
Cheonan City score 1.29 goals per game on average and Seongnam 1.14. The K League 2 average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Cheonan City's matches and 57% of Seongnam's.
What form are Cheonan City and Seongnam in?
Over the last 5 games Cheonan City have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Seongnam 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheonan City vs Seongnam?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Cheonan City vs Seongnam: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


