South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 08 September 2026

Cheongju vs Asan Mugunghwa: match statistics

Cheongju crest
Cheongju
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Asan Mugunghwa crest
Asan Mugunghwa

Cheongju vs Asan Mugunghwa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cheongju played Asan Mugunghwa in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Cheongju: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Asan Mugunghwa: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cheongju scores 1.25 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Asan Mugunghwa scores 1.86 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.86 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cheongju 88%, Asan Mugunghwa 86%. Over 2.5: Cheongju 63%, Asan Mugunghwa 71%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Asan Mugunghwa has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.53. Cheongju: 13.4 shots per match, Asan Mugunghwa: 12.7.

Match halves

Cheongju: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.75. Asan Mugunghwa: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.14.

Goals by minute

Cheongju: 31-45+ (3 goals). Asan Mugunghwa: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.86 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Asan Mugunghwa sit 7th in the table while Cheongju are 13th and have 3 wins this season versus 0 for the hosts. In the last 5 matches Cheongju scored 5 goals and have a 0-4-1 record (0.8 pts per match), whereas Asan scored 8 goals and are 2-2-1 (1.6 pts per match). At home Cheongju average 15.75 shots (5 on target) but convert only 6% and register 1.0 goal with an xG of 1.77; Asan away average 11.5 shots (4 on target), 17% conversion and 2.0 goals with xG 1.65 — the visitors are therefore markedly more efficient with fewer attempts. Defensively Cheongju concede 2.0 goals at home with xG against 1.14, while Asan concede 1.5 goals away with xG against 1.2; both teams have 0% clean sheets and 0% matches without conceding, which favors a high-scoring game. Considering the visitors’ superior finishing (17% vs 6%), higher recent points average (1.6 vs 0.8) and Cheongju’s lack of home wins, I forecast an Asan Mugunghwa victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict BTTS - YES — Cheongju has a seasonal BTTS rate of 80% and Asan Mugunghwa 100%; in the last 5 matches both teams produced BTTS in 80% of games, providing a strong historical signal. Seasonally the home side scores 1.8 and concedes 1.6, the away side scores 2.0 and concedes 1.5; attacking xG is 1.56 (Cheongju) vs 1.65 (Asan), and xG against 1.4 vs 1.2 confirm both teams create and allow scoring chances. Asan has 0% clean sheets this season, Cheongju only 20%, and the league has 63% BTTS, so a goalless match looks unlikely; additionally Over 2.5 is 60% (Cheongju) and 100% (Asan). In the last 5 matches Cheongju averaged 1.0 goals scored and 1.2 conceded, Asan 1.6 scored and 1.2 conceded, and last-5 xG is 1.78 for Cheongju and 1.54 for Asan, which confirms chance creation on both sides. Considering the 80%/100% seasonal BTTS, Asan's lack of clean sheets and shots on target of 4.2 and 4.0, I assess BTTS probability at 90% for 'yes' and 10% for 'no', selecting 'yes' as the preferred pick.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG — Cheongju 1.56 and Asan 1.65 — and xG against: Cheongju 1.4 and Asan 1.2, I expect about 1.38 goals for Cheongju and 1.53 for Asan, totaling ~2.91 goals. Seasonal goal averages are 1.8 (Cheongju) and 2.0 (Asan), and the percentage of matches in which both teams scored is 80% for Cheongju and 100% for Asan; season rates of matches over 2.5 are 60% for Cheongju and 100% for Asan, which increases the likelihood of over 2 goals. Shot statistics support this assumption: on average 13.2 shots and 4.2 on target for the home side versus 11.5 and 4.0 for the away side, with conversion rates of 14% vs 17%, translating into realistic scoring chances. A Poisson model with λ=2.91 yields probabilities of: over 1.5 ≈79%, over 2.5 ≈56% and over 3.5 ≈33%, so the strongest signal is over 1.5. Due to the highest probability and consistency with xG and seasonal indicators, I pick the over side at the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Seasonal statistics show Cheongju led at the break in 40% of matches (10 first-half goals, averaging 1.0 goal at half-time), while Asan did not lead at half-time (0% of cases and an average of 0.0 first-half goals), which points toward a home lead after 45 minutes. At the same time Asan posts a higher xG (1.65 vs 1.56) and a markedly stronger second half: averaging 2.0 goals scored after the break versus Cheongju’s 0.8, and second-half ppg of 2.0 vs 1.6, suggesting the visitors’ ability to stage a turnaround. Over the full match Asan averages 2.0 goals per game versus the home side’s 1.8 and holds a higher seasonal win rate (50% vs 40%); in the last 5 matches they have better points form (1.6 pts vs 0.8 pts), which favors an away win on full time. Additionally both teams frequently score (BTTS 80% for Cheongju, 100% for Asan), so comeback goals after the break are likely; for these reasons I assign the highest probability to the 1/2 scenario (home leading at half-time, visitors winning after 90 minutes).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
10Shots10
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1Shots on target4
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1.24xG1.35
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
6Corners6
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
74Dangerous attacks61
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
12Fouls13
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
3Cards4
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1.25Goals scored / match1.86
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1.75Goals conceded / match1.57
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
54%Average possession54%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
4.63Shots on target / match4.14
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.38Shots per match12.71
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
4.63Shots on target4.14
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
9.3%Shot conversion14.6%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
54%Possession54%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1.53xG for1.59
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1.15xG against1.34
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

Shooting quality

Cheongju: BalancedAsan Mugunghwa: Efficient finishing
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.45

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Asan Mugunghwa is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.6 pts / match - Asan Mugunghwa

Cheongju
DLDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W75% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-6-2
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-2
Last 5 at home
0-2-2
LDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.94Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Asan Mugunghwa
LWWDD
Season result split
43% W29% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-2
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Asan Mugunghwa is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.86 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa

Asan Mugunghwa is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.75 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.57 goals / match - Asan Mugunghwa

Cheongju scoring profile: very strong

Cheongju scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Asan Mugunghwa keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).

Asan Mugunghwa scoring profile: very strong

Asan Mugunghwa scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).

10Goals scored (season)13
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
14Goals conceded (season)11
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
3Average goals in match3.43
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
5Goals scored (last 5)8
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal100%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
38%2 goals57%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
0%3 goals29%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
0%4 goals0%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal86%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
63%2 goals57%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
13%3 goals14%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
13%4 goals0%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time43%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
0%BTTS in both halves29%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
25%Scored in both halves43%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS71%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
80%BTTS - last 580%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Asan Mugunghwa is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.88 pts / match - Cheongju · 1 pts / match - Asan Mugunghwa

Cheongju - half-time state
13% leading50% draw38% trailing
Asan Mugunghwa - half-time state
29% leading14% draw57% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.88Points per match (1st half)1
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.71
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)1
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.71
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
38%Clean sheet before half-time29%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
50%No goal before half-time29%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1.71
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)1.14
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.71
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
38%Clean sheet after half-time43%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa
38%No goal after half-time29%
CheongjuAsan Mugunghwa

Cheongju - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Asan Mugunghwa - second-half results

43% W43% R14% P
7
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cheongju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Asan Mugunghwa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cheongju
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
0
1
16-30
3
3
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Asan Mugunghwa
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.22
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
87%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-38%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
88%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cheongju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.88
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Asan Mugunghwa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

CheongjuLigaAsan Mugunghwa
Average goals in match 3.002.86 3.43
Both teams scored 88%66% 86%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%59% 71%
Clean sheets 13%20% 14%
Goal before half-time 75%81% 100%
Goal after half-time 75%76% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.86
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.36
Home goals / match
1.50
Away goals / match
+-9%
Home attack advantage
+-10%
Home defence advantage
+-8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Asan MugunghwaSubstitutionOn: Hye-Sung KimOff: Jung-Hyun Kim
  2. Asan MugunghwaSubstitutionOn: Se-Jun JungOff: Naeem Mohammed
  3. CheongjuYellow cardGeon-Woo Park
  4. Asan MugunghwaYellow cardHye-Sung Kim
  5. Asan MugunghwaYellow cardYeon-woo Lee
  6. Asan MugunghwaYellow cardHee-Won Choe
  7. CheongjuYellow cardJu-Young Cho
  8. CheongjuYellow cardGeon-Woo Park
  9. Asan MugunghwaYellow cardJoon-Ho Son

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Cheongju 0 - 1 - 2 Asan Mugunghwa. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Asan Mugunghwa FC
0 : 0
Cheongju FC
Cheongju FC
0 : 2
Asan Mugunghwa FC
Asan Mugunghwa FC
3 : 1
Cheongju FC

FAQ

What was the result of Cheongju vs Asan Mugunghwa?

The K League 2 match finished Cheongju 0:0 Asan Mugunghwa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cheongju and Asan Mugunghwa?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cheongju won 0, Asan Mugunghwa won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cheongju vs Asan Mugunghwa?

Cheongju score 1.25 goals per game on average and Asan Mugunghwa 1.86. The K League 2 average is 2.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 88% of Cheongju's matches and 86% of Asan Mugunghwa's.

What form are Cheongju and Asan Mugunghwa in?

Over the last 5 games Cheongju have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Asan Mugunghwa 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheongju vs Asan Mugunghwa?

The statistical background for Cheongju vs Asan Mugunghwa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.