South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 13 September 2026

Cheongju vs Busan I'Park: match statistics

Cheongju crest
Cheongju
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Busan I'Park crest
Busan I'Park

Cheongju vs Busan I'Park: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cheongju played Busan I'Park in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 29 March 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Cheongju: 0-3-1, 0.75 points/match. Busan I'Park: 3-1-0, 2.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cheongju scores 1.50 and concedes 2.25 goals per match. Busan I'Park scores 2.50 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cheongju 100%, Busan I'Park 100%. Over 2.5: Cheongju 75%, Busan I'Park 75%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Busan I'Park has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.14. Cheongju: 10.0 shots per match, Busan I'Park: 14.3.

Match halves

Cheongju: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.75. Busan I'Park: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.75.

Goals by minute

Cheongju: 31-45+ (2 goals). Busan I'Park: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The away side, Busan I'Park, are the clear favorites — sitting 2nd in the table and showing excellent away form (3 wins, 1 draw, 0 losses). Busan’s attacking metrics are superior: 3.0 goals per away match, 19 shots, 16% conversion and average xG 1.99 while conceding just 1.5. Cheongju struggle at home — 0 wins (Win% 0), conceding 2.5 goals per home match with a negative goal difference and lower attacking efficiency (12 shots, 8% conversion). Additionally, the hosts have 0% clean sheets and higher real goals conceded despite slightly higher possession, which increases the visitors’ chances of taking points. Based on this, I predict a Busan I'Park win, with a draw as the secondary, lower-probability outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have 100% seasonal BTTS, with Cheongju 80% and Busan I'Park 100% in the last 5 — a strong case for this market. Average xG (1.15 Cheongju vs 1.99 Busan) plus substantial shot volume and conversion efficiency indicate both teams create enough chances. Cheongju concedes ~1 per match, Busan ~1.5, increasing the likelihood of both scoring. No clean sheets (CS% = 0 for both) and a high share of Over2.5, especially for Busan, further confirm BTTS. Based on all available stats I recommend BTTS = YES as the strongest signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Model xG suggests 1.15 for Cheongju and 1.99 for Busan, totaling 3.14 expected goals, above typical thresholds. Both teams have BTTS at 100% and a high share of matches over 1.5 goals; shot and xG metrics particularly favor Busan (more shots and higher xG). Seasonal Over2.5 and Over3.5 rates show a strong signal from the away side (100%) and a moderate inclination from the home side (50%), boosting the probability of higher lines. League average ~3.06 also supports bets on more goals. The strongest and most reliable signal from the data is over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Busan I'Park shows markedly better offensive metrics (xG 1.99 vs 1.15, more shots and higher goal averages), supporting an away win at full-time. Cheongju, however, has stronger first-half stats (avg 1.0 HT goals vs 0.5 for the visitors and higher HT PPG), raising the probability they lead at the break. Both teams have high first-half scoring rates (seasonOver05PercentageHT 100% for both), indicating an active first half with goals. Considering the visitors’ second-half advantage and the hosts’ tendency to score before half-time, the most likely scenario is HT/FT 1/2 (home leads at HT, away wins FT).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
CheongjuBusan I'Park
20Shots14
CheongjuBusan I'Park
5Shots on target6
CheongjuBusan I'Park
2.14xG1.66
CheongjuBusan I'Park
7Corners3
CheongjuBusan I'Park
74Dangerous attacks49
CheongjuBusan I'Park
17Fouls19
CheongjuBusan I'Park
3Cards1
CheongjuBusan I'Park

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CheongjuBusan I'Park
1.5Goals scored / match2.5
CheongjuBusan I'Park
2.25Goals conceded / match1.25
CheongjuBusan I'Park
55%Average possession46%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
3.5Shots on target / match4.75
CheongjuBusan I'Park

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10Shots per match14.25
CheongjuBusan I'Park
3.5Shots on target4.75
CheongjuBusan I'Park
15%Shot conversion17.5%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
55%Possession46%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
1.14xG for1.57
CheongjuBusan I'Park
1.07xG against1.27
CheongjuBusan I'Park

Shooting quality

Cheongju: Efficient finishingBusan I'Park: Counter-attacking
CheongjuBusan I'Park
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.53

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Busan I'Park is 233% better for: last-5 form.

0.75 pts / match - Cheongju · 2.5 pts / match - Busan I'Park

Cheongju
LDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W75% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-1
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-1
0.75 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 2.3xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 75%
Busan I'Park
DWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
75% W25% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-0
2.50 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-0
2.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.5Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Busan I'Park is 67% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Cheongju · 2.5 goals / match - Busan I'Park

Busan I'Park is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.25 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.25 goals / match - Busan I'Park

Cheongju scoring profile: very strong

Cheongju scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Busan I'Park keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

Busan I'Park scoring profile: very strong

Busan I'Park scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

6Goals scored (season)10
CheongjuBusan I'Park
9Goals conceded (season)5
CheongjuBusan I'Park
3.75Average goals in match3.75
CheongjuBusan I'Park
6Goals scored (last 5)10
CheongjuBusan I'Park
9Goals conceded (last 5)5
CheongjuBusan I'Park

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
50%2 goals75%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
0%3 goals75%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
0%4 goals0%
CheongjuBusan I'Park

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
75%2 goals25%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
25%3 goals0%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
25%4 goals0%
CheongjuBusan I'Park

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

59%
League average

Goal patterns

75%BTTS at half-time25%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
0%BTTS in both halves0%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
25%Scored in both halves50%
CheongjuBusan I'Park

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
100%BTTS - last 5100%
CheongjuBusan I'Park

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
75%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
CheongjuBusan I'Park

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time75%
CheongjuBusan I'Park

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Busan I'Park is 250% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.75 pts / match - Busan I'Park

Cheongju - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Busan I'Park - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)1.75
CheongjuBusan I'Park
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.75
CheongjuBusan I'Park
1.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
CheongjuBusan I'Park
2Average goals (1st half)1.25
CheongjuBusan I'Park
0%Clean sheet before half-time50%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
25%No goal before half-time25%
CheongjuBusan I'Park

After half-time (2nd half)

1.75Points per match (2nd half)2.5
CheongjuBusan I'Park
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)1.75
CheongjuBusan I'Park
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
CheongjuBusan I'Park
1.75Average goals (2nd half)2.5
CheongjuBusan I'Park
50%Clean sheet after half-time25%
CheongjuBusan I'Park
50%No goal after half-time25%
CheongjuBusan I'Park

Cheongju - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
2
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Busan I'Park - second-half results

75% W25% D0% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cheongju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.501.75
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.31.0
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal100%75%
2 goals75%50%
3 goals25%50%
Clean sheet0%50%
No goal25%50%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 25% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 75% - Half-time goals total: 3
Busan I'Park - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.752.50
Goals scored / match0.81.8
Goals conceded / match0.50.8
Average goals in match1.32.5
1 goal100%75%
2 goals25%75%
3 goals0%75%
Clean sheet50%25%
No goal25%25%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 50% leading - 25% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 25% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cheongju
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Busan I'Park
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 2.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
135%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cheongju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
157%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Busan I'Park

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.95
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.93
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
175%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

CheongjuLigaBusan I'Park
Average goals in match 3.752.78 3.75
Both teams scored 100%59% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%54% 75%
Clean sheets 0%24% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%84% 100%
Goal after half-time 75%68% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.78
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.43
Away goals / match
+-6%
Home attack advantage
+-6%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Busan I'ParkSubstitutionOn: Se-Hoon KimOff: Hyun-Beom Ahn
  2. CheongjuYellow cardGeon-Woo Park
  3. Busan I'ParkGoalGabriel Honorio RamosAssist: Chan Kim
  4. Busan I'ParkYellow cardGabriel Honorio Ramos
  5. CheongjuYellow cardJong-Eon Lee
  6. CheongjuSubstitutionOn: Jae-Won SeoOff: Jong-Eon Lee
  7. CheongjuGoalIrakli BughridzeAssist: Seung-Chan Heo
  8. Busan I'ParkGoalGa-On Baek
  9. Busan I'ParkSubstitutionOn: Hee-Seung KimOff: Jun-Seok Son
  10. CheongjuYellow cardKang-Han Lee

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Cheongju 0 - 2 - 1 Busan I'Park. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Busan I'Park
2 : 2
Cheongju FC
Busan I'Park
2 : 2
Cheongju FC
Cheongju FC
0 : 2
Busan I'Park

FAQ

What was the result of Cheongju vs Busan I'Park?

The K League 2 match finished Cheongju 1:2 Busan I'Park. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cheongju and Busan I'Park?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cheongju won 0, Busan I'Park won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cheongju vs Busan I'Park?

Cheongju score 1.50 goals per game on average and Busan I'Park 2.50. The K League 2 average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Cheongju's matches and 100% of Busan I'Park's.

What form are Cheongju and Busan I'Park in?

Over the last 5 games Cheongju have a 0-3-1 record (0.75 points per game) and Busan I'Park 3-1-0 (2.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheongju vs Busan I'Park?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.