Cheongju vs Daegu: match statistics
Cheongju vs Daegu: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cheongju played Daegu in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 4 July 2026. Venue: Cheongju Stadium. Final score: 1:5.
Current form
Cheongju: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Daegu: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cheongju scores 1.21 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Daegu scores 1.93 and concedes 1.36. League average: 2.74 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cheongju 79%, Daegu 64%. Over 2.5: Cheongju 57%, Daegu 64%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Daegu has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.44. Cheongju: 11.5 shots per match, Daegu: 14.3.
Match halves
Cheongju: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.71. Daegu: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.21.
Goals by minute
Cheongju: 76-90+ (5 goals). Daegu: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a Daegu win ('2') — the visitors have 7 wins, 4 draws and 3 losses this season, while Cheongju have only 1 win, 10 draws and 3 losses. In the last 5 matches Daegu scored 9 goals with a 3-2-0 record, whereas Cheongju scored 6 goals, failed to win and are 0–3–2, highlighting a clear difference in form momentum. Offensively, Daegu away average 1.83 goals with xG 1.72 and 5.17 shots on target, while Cheongju at home average 1.00 goal per game with xG 1.60 and 4.14 shots on target; a conversion rate of 15% versus 8% further favors the visitors. Defensively, Cheongju concede 1.71 goals at home on average and have allowed 8 goals in the last 5 matches, while Daegu concede 1.5 goals away and only 2 goals in their last 5 fixtures, indicating greater defensive stability for the visitors. Cheongju also have a 0% win rate and 57% draws in home matches and average 0.6 points per game in the last 5 matches versus 2.2 points per game for Daegu, therefore I assess win probability as: Daegu 65%, draw 25%, Cheongju 10%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators favor BTTS - Daegu has a season rate of matches with both teams scoring at 83%, versus a league average of 63%. Both teams' xG are high (Cheongju 1.93 vs Daegu 1.72), suggesting goals from both sides. Both sides also have a high share of matches over 2.5 goals (Cheongju 63%, Daegu 67%), and across the season Daegu scored 27 goals compared to Cheongju's 17, reinforcing an offensive scenario. The counterargument is Daegu's recent form: in their last 5 matches BTTS is 40% and they conceded a total of 2 goals (0.4 per game), whereas Cheongju in their last 5 has BTTS 80%, conceded 8 goals (1.6 per game) and scored 6 (1.2 per game), showing hosts have been conceding more recently. Cheongju has had no matches this season without scoring (0% matches without a goal), while at home they have 50% clean sheets, which is a mixed signal but also indicates the hosts usually score. Considering the strong seasonal signal for Daegu (83%), the high xG for both sides (1.93 vs 1.72) and the league BTTS average of 63%, I favor the 'both teams to score' scenario and price it at 65% vs 35% for 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG (Cheongju xG_for 1.93, Daegu xG_for 1.72) and xG against (Cheongju 1.48, Daegu 1.34) I project 1.64 goals for the home side and 1.60 for the away side, totaling 3.24 goals. This season 75% of Cheongju’s matches and 83% of Daegu’s matches have finished over 1.5 goals, while the league average is 2.74, so I assess Over 1.5 at 88%. The 2.5 line has solid backing: Cheongju records 63% of games over 2.5 and Daegu 67%, and the expected 3.24 goals implies Over 2.5 at roughly 68%. Signals for 3.5 are mixed — Daegu has 67% of matches over 3.5, Cheongju only 38%, but the combined expected total of 3.24 is below 3.5, so I give a slight edge to Under (Over 48% / Under 52%). BTTS is 50% for the home side and 83% for the away side, which further increases the likelihood of a multi-goal game and confirms that the strongest signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time a draw looks most likely: Cheongju are drawing at the break in 63% of their home matches, with first-half goals averaging 0.75 for the hosts versus 0.67 for Daegu. After the break there is significant goal activity – 88% of home fixtures see at least one second-half goal, Daegu also have 83% of away matches with a second-half goal, and second-half goals average 1.88 (Cheongju) vs 2.00 (Daegu), which raises the likelihood of a decision after the break. The final result favors the hosts: Cheongju win 63% of home games, have the higher xG (1.93 vs 1.72) and more shots (15.63 vs 12.5), so a draw at HT is more often turned into a Cheongju victory. Despite the hosts’ poor form over the last five matches (dddll, 0% wins) and Daegu’s good recent form (60% wins in their last five), the seasonal metrics and the advantage in xG/shots support the scenario of a half-time draw and a Cheongju win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cheongju | Daegu | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Daegu is 83% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Cheongju · 2.2 pts / match - Daegu
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Daegu is 60% better for: goals scored per match.
1.21 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.93 goals / match - Daegu
Daegu is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.36 goals / match - Daegu
Cheongju scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Daegu keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
Daegu scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cheongju
Over / Under - Daegu
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Daegu is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.36 pts / match - Daegu
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cheongju - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 7%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Daegu - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cheongju
Daegu
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Cheongju | Liga | Daegu | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.71 | 2.74 | ▲ 3.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 79% | 63% | • 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 57% | 57% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 23% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 73% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Cheongju vs Daegu?
The K League 2 match finished Cheongju 1:5 Daegu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cheongju vs Daegu?
Cheongju score 1.21 goals per game on average and Daegu 1.93. The K League 2 average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 79% of Cheongju's matches and 64% of Daegu's.
What form are Cheongju and Daegu in?
Over the last 5 games Cheongju have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Daegu 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheongju vs Daegu?
The statistical background for Cheongju vs Daegu — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


