Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics
Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cheongju play Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 9 May 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Cheongju: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Gimpo Citizen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cheongju scores 1.18 and concedes 1.59 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.18 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cheongju 76%, Gimpo Citizen 53%. Over 2.5: Cheongju 53%, Gimpo Citizen 35%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.42. Cheongju: 11.3 shots per match, Gimpo Citizen: 12.3.
Match halves
Cheongju: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.65. Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.65.
Goals by minute
Cheongju: 76-90+ (6 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
3 H2H matches: 1-0-2. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 33%.
Match description
I predict a draw (X). Cheongju has not won at home this season (0 wins), recording 8 draws and 2 losses, and in their last five matches overall they had 5 draws with a goal record of 3-3. Gimpo Citizen shows better offensive efficiency (3 wins, 4 draws, 2 losses this season) and scored 8 goals in their last 5 matches; they also have higher PPG in the last 5 (1.2 vs 1.0 for Cheongju) and average 1.33 goals away with xG 1.54. The visitors convert more chances (11% vs 5% for the hosts) and concede on average 1.11 goals away, whereas Cheongju concedes 1.6 goals at home and despite a higher home xG (1.66) struggle to finish actions (avg. 0.8 goals per match). Given Cheongju’s lack of home wins, the high draw rate for both teams (Cheongju 5 draws in last 5, Gimpo 44% draws away) and the visitors’ superior efficiency, a shared point is the most likely outcome.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cheongju | Gimpo Citizen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cheongju is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Cheongju · 1 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gimpo Citizen is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.59 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.12 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen
Cheongju scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
Gimpo Citizen scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Cheongju
Over / Under — Gimpo Citizen
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cheongju - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gimpo Citizen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cheongju
Gimpo Citizen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Cheongju | Liga | Gimpo Citizen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.76 | 2.75 | ▼ 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 76% | 61% | ▼ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 53% | 56% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | • 24% | 24% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 73% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Cheongju 1 - 0 - 2 Gimpo Citizen. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen?
The K League 2 match finished Cheongju 1:1 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cheongju and Gimpo Citizen?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cheongju won 1, Gimpo Citizen won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen?
Cheongju score 1.18 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 1.18. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 76% of Cheongju's matches and 53% of Gimpo Citizen's.
What form are Cheongju and Gimpo Citizen in?
Over the last 5 games Cheongju have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.