Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics
Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cheongju played Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Cheongju: 0-5-0, 1.00 points/match. Gimpo Citizen: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cheongju scores 1.00 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.33 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.76 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cheongju 70%, Gimpo Citizen 56%. Over 2.5: Cheongju 50%, Gimpo Citizen 44%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.47. Cheongju: 12.5 shots per match, Gimpo Citizen: 12.1.
Match halves
Cheongju: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.60. Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.78.
Goals by minute
Cheongju: 31-45+ (3 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw (X). Cheongju has not won at home this season (0 wins), recording 8 draws and 2 losses, and in their last five matches overall they had 5 draws with a goal record of 3-3. Gimpo Citizen shows better offensive efficiency (3 wins, 4 draws, 2 losses this season) and scored 8 goals in their last 5 matches; they also have higher PPG in the last 5 (1.2 vs 1.0 for Cheongju) and average 1.33 goals away with xG 1.54. The visitors convert more chances (11% vs 5% for the hosts) and concede on average 1.11 goals away, whereas Cheongju concedes 1.6 goals at home and despite a higher home xG (1.66) struggle to finish actions (avg. 0.8 goals per match). Given Cheongju’s lack of home wins, the high draw rate for both teams (Cheongju 5 draws in last 5, Gimpo 44% draws away) and the visitors’ superior efficiency, a shared point is the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Gimpo Citizen have an away BTTS rate of 56% this season and an 80% overall BTTS rate in their last 5 matches, with an average of 1.33 goals scored and 1.11 conceded away—strongly indicating involvement in matches with goals at both ends. K League 2 records 63% BTTS and an average of 2.76 goals per game, so the competition context favors open games and Goal/Goal outcomes. Cheongju formally shows 0% BTTS at home this season by the data, but in the last 5 matches BTTS was 40% and they scored 3 and conceded 3 (0.6 scored and 0.6 conceded per match), so recent performances indicate they can both score and concede. Additionally, Cheongju’s last 5 matches show average xG 1.51 with xG against 1.06, while Gimpo away have team xG 1.54 and xG against 1.07, meaning both sides create chances (xG ~1.5) and there is a real probability of goals from both teams. Considering Gimpo’s 80% BTTS in the last 5, the 63% league trend and the repeated high xG figures (1.51 and 1.54), I recommend a BTTS - Yes bet with a 70% probability vs 30% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The forecast is based on xG and recent results: Cheongju has an xG of 1.51 over the last 5 matches but actually scores an average of 0.6 goals per game, while Gimpo has a seasonal xG of 1.54 and scores an average of 1.33 goals per game (last 5: 1.6). Averaging xG and actual figures yields an expected 1.06 goals for Cheongju and 1.57 for Gimpo, a combined 2.63 goals. Since 2.63 is well above the 1.5 threshold, I assign Over 1.5 a high probability of 89% (Under 11%), and rate Over 2.5 as moderate at 58% given the league records Over 2.5 in 56% of matches and Gimpo has Over 2.5 in 60% of their last 5. Over 3.5 is only 23% likely due to the home side’s low efficiency (3 goals in the last 5 matches, 0.6 avg) and Cheongju’s season-long low goals scored.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is X/X (draw at half-time and draw at full-time), because Gimpo was level at the break in 6 of their last 9 matches (67%) and finished matches as draws in 4 of 9 appearances (44%). Cheongju has no recorded seasonal home statistics (all home values = 0) and has registered 5 draws in their last 5 matches, which reduces the likelihood that the home side will hold a lead at the break. Gimpo scores an average of 1.33 goals per match with an xG of 1.54 against an xG conceded of 1.07 and averages 1.44 goals in the second half; 89% of their matches have at least one goal after the break, hence I assigned significant weight to scenarios decided after half-time (X/2 17% and 2/2 18%). Scenarios with Cheongju leading at the break I rate very low (total 5%) due to the lack of home data and the recent form of 5 draws in 5 matches, while Gimpo leading at the break occurs in only 2 of 9 matches (22%), which limits the contribution of the 2/1 and 2/X options.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cheongju | Gimpo Citizen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gimpo Citizen is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.2 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gimpo Citizen is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.33 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen
Gimpo Citizen is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.11 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen
Cheongju scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).
Gimpo Citizen scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cheongju
Over / Under - Gimpo Citizen
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gimpo Citizen is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.9 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.33 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cheongju - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gimpo Citizen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cheongju
Gimpo Citizen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Cheongju | Liga | Gimpo Citizen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.40 | 2.76 | ▼ 2.44 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 62% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 23% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 78% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 74% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Cheongju 1 - 0 - 2 Gimpo Citizen. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen?
The K League 2 match finished Cheongju 1:1 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cheongju and Gimpo Citizen?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cheongju won 1, Gimpo Citizen won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen?
Cheongju score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 1.33. The K League 2 average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Cheongju's matches and 56% of Gimpo Citizen's.
What form are Cheongju and Gimpo Citizen in?
Over the last 5 games Cheongju have a 0-5-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


