South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 07 September 2026

Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics

Cheongju crest
Cheongju
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen

Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cheongju played Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Cheongju: 0-5-0, 1.00 points/match. Gimpo Citizen: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cheongju scores 1.00 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.33 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.76 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cheongju 70%, Gimpo Citizen 56%. Over 2.5: Cheongju 50%, Gimpo Citizen 44%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.47. Cheongju: 12.5 shots per match, Gimpo Citizen: 12.1.

Match halves

Cheongju: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.60. Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.78.

Goals by minute

Cheongju: 31-45+ (3 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a draw (X). Cheongju has not won at home this season (0 wins), recording 8 draws and 2 losses, and in their last five matches overall they had 5 draws with a goal record of 3-3. Gimpo Citizen shows better offensive efficiency (3 wins, 4 draws, 2 losses this season) and scored 8 goals in their last 5 matches; they also have higher PPG in the last 5 (1.2 vs 1.0 for Cheongju) and average 1.33 goals away with xG 1.54. The visitors convert more chances (11% vs 5% for the hosts) and concede on average 1.11 goals away, whereas Cheongju concedes 1.6 goals at home and despite a higher home xG (1.66) struggle to finish actions (avg. 0.8 goals per match). Given Cheongju’s lack of home wins, the high draw rate for both teams (Cheongju 5 draws in last 5, Gimpo 44% draws away) and the visitors’ superior efficiency, a shared point is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Gimpo Citizen have an away BTTS rate of 56% this season and an 80% overall BTTS rate in their last 5 matches, with an average of 1.33 goals scored and 1.11 conceded away—strongly indicating involvement in matches with goals at both ends. K League 2 records 63% BTTS and an average of 2.76 goals per game, so the competition context favors open games and Goal/Goal outcomes. Cheongju formally shows 0% BTTS at home this season by the data, but in the last 5 matches BTTS was 40% and they scored 3 and conceded 3 (0.6 scored and 0.6 conceded per match), so recent performances indicate they can both score and concede. Additionally, Cheongju’s last 5 matches show average xG 1.51 with xG against 1.06, while Gimpo away have team xG 1.54 and xG against 1.07, meaning both sides create chances (xG ~1.5) and there is a real probability of goals from both teams. Considering Gimpo’s 80% BTTS in the last 5, the 63% league trend and the repeated high xG figures (1.51 and 1.54), I recommend a BTTS - Yes bet with a 70% probability vs 30% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The forecast is based on xG and recent results: Cheongju has an xG of 1.51 over the last 5 matches but actually scores an average of 0.6 goals per game, while Gimpo has a seasonal xG of 1.54 and scores an average of 1.33 goals per game (last 5: 1.6). Averaging xG and actual figures yields an expected 1.06 goals for Cheongju and 1.57 for Gimpo, a combined 2.63 goals. Since 2.63 is well above the 1.5 threshold, I assign Over 1.5 a high probability of 89% (Under 11%), and rate Over 2.5 as moderate at 58% given the league records Over 2.5 in 56% of matches and Gimpo has Over 2.5 in 60% of their last 5. Over 3.5 is only 23% likely due to the home side’s low efficiency (3 goals in the last 5 matches, 0.6 avg) and Cheongju’s season-long low goals scored.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is X/X (draw at half-time and draw at full-time), because Gimpo was level at the break in 6 of their last 9 matches (67%) and finished matches as draws in 4 of 9 appearances (44%). Cheongju has no recorded seasonal home statistics (all home values = 0) and has registered 5 draws in their last 5 matches, which reduces the likelihood that the home side will hold a lead at the break. Gimpo scores an average of 1.33 goals per match with an xG of 1.54 against an xG conceded of 1.07 and averages 1.44 goals in the second half; 89% of their matches have at least one goal after the break, hence I assigned significant weight to scenarios decided after half-time (X/2 17% and 2/2 18%). Scenarios with Cheongju leading at the break I rate very low (total 5%) due to the lack of home data and the recent form of 5 draws in 5 matches, while Gimpo leading at the break occurs in only 2 of 9 matches (22%), which limits the contribution of the 2/1 and 2/X options.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
9Shots8
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1Shots on target2
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1.22xG1.13
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
6Corners2
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
81Dangerous attacks67
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
16Fouls14
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1Cards2
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1Goals scored / match1.33
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1.4Goals conceded / match1.11
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
55%Average possession50%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
4.2Shots on target / match4.67
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match12.11
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
4.2Shots on target4.67
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
8%Shot conversion11%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
55%Possession50%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1.47xG for1.54
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1.12xG against1.07
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

Shooting quality

Cheongju: BalancedGimpo Citizen: Balanced
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)34%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gimpo Citizen is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.2 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Cheongju
DDDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W80% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-8-2
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-5-0
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-3-2
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
LDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Gimpo Citizen
DWDDL
Season result split
33% W44% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-2
1.44 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gimpo Citizen is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.33 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Gimpo Citizen is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.4 goals / match - Cheongju · 1.11 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen

Cheongju scoring profile: strong

Cheongju scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

10Goals scored (season)12
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
14Goals conceded (season)10
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
2.4Average goals in match2.44
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
3Goals scored (last 5)8
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal78%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
30%2 goals33%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
0%3 goals22%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
0%4 goals0%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal67%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
50%2 goals33%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
10%3 goals11%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
10%4 goals0%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time33%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
0%BTTS in both halves11%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
20%Scored in both halves33%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
40%BTTS - last 580%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gimpo Citizen is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.9 pts / match - Cheongju · 1.33 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen

Cheongju - half-time state
10% leading60% draw30% trailing
Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
22% leading67% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.9Points per match (1st half)1.33
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.56
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1Average goals (1st half)1
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
50%Clean sheet before half-time56%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
60%No goal before half-time56%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.56
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.44
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
50%Clean sheet after half-time56%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen
50%No goal after half-time33%
CheongjuGimpo Citizen

Cheongju - second-half results

20% W60% R20% P
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

44% W22% R33% P
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cheongju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.21.0
1 goal20%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cheongju
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
0
1
16-30
3
3
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+38%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cheongju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.75
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

CheongjuLigaGimpo Citizen
Average goals in match 2.402.76 2.44
Both teams scored 70%62% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%56% 44%
Clean sheets 30%23% 33%
Goal before half-time 60%78% 56%
Goal after half-time 60%74% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardDo-Hyuk Kim
  2. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardMin-Sik Kim
  3. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Hak-Min LeeOff: Min-Sik Kim
  4. CheongjuSubstitutionOn: Jin-Woo JeongOff: Finley Welch
  5. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Min-Seog KimOff: Si-Heon Lee
  6. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Bu-Seong JangOff: Chang-Seok Lim
  7. Gimpo CitizenGoalMin-Seog KimAssist: Bu-Seong Jang

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Cheongju 1 - 0 - 2 Gimpo Citizen. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Cheongju FC
0 : 2
Gimpo Citizen FC
Cheongju FC
0 : 3
Gimpo Citizen FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
2 : 3
Cheongju FC

FAQ

What was the result of Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen?

The K League 2 match finished Cheongju 1:1 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cheongju and Gimpo Citizen?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cheongju won 1, Gimpo Citizen won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen?

Cheongju score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 1.33. The K League 2 average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Cheongju's matches and 56% of Gimpo Citizen's.

What form are Cheongju and Gimpo Citizen in?

Over the last 5 games Cheongju have a 0-5-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cheongju vs Gimpo Citizen?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.