Bulgaria - First LeagueStadion TichaData current as of 01 September 2026

Cherno More vs Dunav 2010: match statistics

Cherno More crest
Cherno More
3 : 1half-time 0:0
Dunav 2010 crest
Dunav 2010

Cherno More vs Dunav 2010: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cherno More played Dunav 2010 in First League (Bulgaria). The match was played on 21 August 2026. Venue: Stadion Ticha. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Cherno More: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Dunav 2010: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cherno More scores 0.80 and concedes 2.40 goals per match. Dunav 2010 scores 0.80 and concedes 1.80. League average: 2.76 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cherno More 60%, Dunav 2010 60%. Over 2.5: Cherno More 60%, Dunav 2010 60%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Cherno More has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.06. Cherno More: 8.4 shots per match, Dunav 2010: 6.8.

Match halves

Cherno More: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40. Dunav 2010: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Cherno More: 0-15 (1 goals). Dunav 2010: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First League: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cherno More remain winless after 5 rounds, having scored only 4 goals and conceded as many as 12, which highlights a clear problem with protecting a lead. At home, the hosts have lost both matches, conceding an average of 3 goals per game, while failing to score in 50% of those appearances. Dunav 2010 also have a poor record, but they have won 1 of their last 5 matches and conceded 9 goals during that period—3 fewer than their opponents. The visitors are more effective away from home, averaging 1.33 goals with a 20% shot conversion rate, while Cherno More average just 1 goal per match with a 9% conversion rate. Although the hosts create more chances, as confirmed by an xG of 1.56 compared with Dunav’s 1.04, their poor defensive record and lack of clean sheets point to a slight advantage for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal against BTTS is Cherno More’s performance in the current setup: the hosts have not scored yet, and their rate of matches without scoring stands at 100%. In their last 5 games, both teams averaged only 0.8 goals per match, which limits the chances of two goals being scored by both sides. Dunav 2010 concede an average of 1.67 goals per game and have not kept a clean sheet, but Cherno More manage just 7.0 shots per match and have an xG of 1.08, so their breakthrough is far from certain. Both teams have recorded BTTS in 60% of their last five matches; however, the hosts’ 0% season BTTS rate and poor finishing shift the assessment towards a scenario in which at least one side fails to score — BTTS No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have very poor defensive records: Cherno More concede an average of 2.0 goals, while Dunav 2010 concede 1.67, with neither side keeping a clean sheet in any of their matches. In their last five games, the hosts allowed opponents to score 2.4 goals per match, compared with 1.8 for the visitors, while at least 3 goals were scored in 60% of matches involving each team. The xG data also supports an open game scenario, as the hosts allow an average of 1.86 xG, while the visitors allow as much as 2.43 xG. The Over 1.5 goals line has the strongest backing: it has landed in 100% of the matches played by both teams so far, while the league average is 2.78 goals. Cherno More’s weaker attacking output, having yet to score at home, limits confidence in higher lines, but the defensive weaknesses clearly point towards at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw is the most likely outcome, as Cherno More have been level at the break in 40% of their last five matches, while the average number of goals in their first halves is just 1.0. Dunav 2010 have scored only 0.2 goals before half-time during this period and have been trailing at the break in as many as 80% of their matches, which limits the visitors’ chances of taking an early lead. After the interval, the home side clearly weaken: in their last five appearances, they conceded an average of 1.8 goals while scoring just 0.4, whereas Dunav scored 0.6 goals in that period. The visitors are also backed by a higher seasonal scoring average—1.33 compared with 0.00 for the hosts at home—and by the fact that Cherno More have lost all of their home matches so far. The X/2 scenario best combines a cautious, low-scoring first half with a higher probability of Dunav gaining the advantage towards the end of the match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

65Possession (%)35
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
10Shots5
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
7Shots on target2
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
1.48xG0.63
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
7Corners4
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
48Dangerous attacks22
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
18Fouls11
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
2Cards2
Cherno MoreDunav 2010

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Cherno MoreDunav 2010
0.8Goals scored / match0.8
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
2.4Goals conceded / match1.8
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
50%Average possession39%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
4.6Shots on target / match3.2
Cherno MoreDunav 2010

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.4Shots per match6.8
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
4.6Shots on target3.2
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
9.5%Shot conversion11.8%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
50%Possession39%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
1.3xG for1.06
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
1.39xG against2.24
Cherno MoreDunav 2010

Shooting quality

Cherno More: BalancedDunav 2010: Balanced
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
Accuracy (shots on target)55%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.170.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dunav 2010 is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Cherno More · 0.6 pts / match - Dunav 2010

Cherno More
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W20% R80% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 at home
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Dunav 2010
LLLLW
Season result split
20% W0% R80% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 away
1-0-2
LLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 2.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dunav 2010 is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.4 goals / match - Cherno More · 1.8 goals / match - Dunav 2010

Cherno More scoring profile: very strong

Cherno More scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Dunav 2010 keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

Dunav 2010 scoring profile: very strong

Dunav 2010 scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Cherno More keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

4Goals scored (season)4
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
12Goals conceded (season)9
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
3.2Average goals in match2.6
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
4Goals scored (last 5)4
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
12Goals conceded (last 5)9
Cherno MoreDunav 2010

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal60%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
20%2 goals20%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
0%3 goals0%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
0%4 goals0%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
60%2 goals80%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
60%3 goals0%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
20%4 goals0%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
20%Scored in both halves0%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
60%BTTS - last 560%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
80%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cherno More is 400% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Cherno More · 0.2 pts / match - Dunav 2010

Cherno More - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
Dunav 2010 - half-time state
0% leading20% draw80% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.2
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.2
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)1
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
1Average goals (1st half)1.2
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
40%Clean sheet before half-time0%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
60%No goal before half-time80%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010

After half-time (2nd half)

0.4Points per match (2nd half)0.8
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
1.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
2.2Average goals (2nd half)1.4
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
20%Clean sheet after half-time20%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010
60%No goal after half-time60%
Cherno MoreDunav 2010

Cherno More - second-half results

0% W40% R60% P
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.2

Concedes 1.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dunav 2010 - second-half results

20% W20% R60% P
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.20
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cherno More - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.8
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-7
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Dunav 2010 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cherno More
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
4
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Dunav 2010
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
0
3
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cherno More

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
52%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
194%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Dunav 2010

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First League).

Teams vs league

Cherno MoreLigaDunav 2010
Average goals in match 3.202.76 2.60
Both teams scored 60%56% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%59% 60%
Clean sheets 0%24% 0%
Goal before half-time 80%76% 100%
Goal after half-time 80%82% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Cherno MoreYellow cardVentsislav Kerchev
  2. Dunav 2010Yellow cardAndré Abreu Alves
  3. Dunav 2010GoalIbrahim Keïta
  4. Dunav 2010SubstitutionOn: José Carlos Cabarcas PérezOff: Denislav Minchev
  5. Dunav 2010Yellow cardAlexander Valiño Navasal
  6. Cherno MoreSubstitutionOn: Jorge Padilla SolerOff: Duarte Miguel Silva Barandas
  7. Cherno MoreSubstitutionOn: Petar Dimitrov AndreevOff: Mohamed Achi Bouakline
  8. Cherno MoreYellow cardLuciano Gastón Squadrone

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Cherno More vs Dunav 2010?

The First League match finished Cherno More 3:1 Dunav 2010. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Cherno More vs Dunav 2010?

Cherno More score 0.80 goals per game on average and Dunav 2010 0.80. The First League average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Cherno More's matches and 60% of Dunav 2010's.

What form are Cherno More and Dunav 2010 in?

Over the last 5 games Cherno More have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Dunav 2010 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cherno More vs Dunav 2010?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.