Chesterfield vs Crewe Alexandra: match statistics
Chesterfield vs Crewe Alexandra: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chesterfield played Crewe Alexandra in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Chesterfield: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Crewe Alexandra: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chesterfield scores 1.52 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Crewe Alexandra scores 1.45 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chesterfield 61%, Crewe Alexandra 59%. Over 2.5: Chesterfield 45%, Crewe Alexandra 55%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Chesterfield has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.39. Chesterfield: 12.2 shots per match, Crewe Alexandra: 12.1.
Match halves
Chesterfield: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.82. Crewe Alexandra: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.73.
Goals by minute
Chesterfield: 76-90+ (17 goals). Crewe Alexandra: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League Two: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chesterfield appear to be the favorites: at home they average 1.64 goals scored and only 1.09 conceded per match, while Crewe on the road average 1.36 scored and 1.27 conceded. Differences in xG and quality of chances favor the hosts — Chesterfield have home xG for 1.53 versus Crewe’s away 1.32, yielding a home xG difference of +0.44 versus -0.21 for the visitors. Additionally, Chesterfield control the game more often (60% possession vs 50%), register more shots (13.55 vs 11.45) and more on target (4.18 vs 3.68), and the percentage of matches without a goal is significantly lower for the hosts (FTS 14% vs 32%). Form confirms the advantage: in the last 5 matches Chesterfield are 3 wins and 2 draws (PPG 2.2) and have conceded 3 goals, while Crewe have 2 wins and 3 losses (PPG 1.2) and have conceded 9 goals. Considering the higher home win rate (45% vs 32% away wins for Crewe), better home GD (+12 vs +2) and Crewe’s much higher away loss rate (45%), I back a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 59% and 60% in the last 5 matches each, strongly indicating a tendency for both sides to score. Chesterfield averages 1.55 goals scored and 1.27 conceded per match, while Crewe average 1.36 scored and 1.27 conceded; their xG are 1.45 (Chesterfield) vs 1.32 (Crewe), and xG against are 1.58 (Chesterfield) vs 1.53 (Crewe), so both teams create and allow similar chances. In the last 5 matches the home side has conceded 0.6 goals on average (3 total), whereas Crewe conceded 1.8 on average (9 total), indicating Chesterfield have been more airtight recently, which partially reduces BTTS risk. Additionally, Crewe have failed to score in 32% of their season matches versus 18% for Chesterfield, but the strong seasonal and five-match BTTS trends and the attacking xG (1.45 and 1.32) outweigh those signals. Therefore I assign a 68% probability to BTTS vs 32% and select "yes" as the preferred pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model forecasts 1.50 goals for Chesterfield and 1.38 goals for Crewe, totaling 2.88 goals. Both teams have 73% of their matches this season with at least 2 goals, while the league average is 2.56 goals per match, so a result over 1.5 is statistically more likely. xG analysis shows Chesterfield generates 1.45 xG on average while conceding 1.53 xG; Crewe generates 1.32 xG while Chesterfield concedes 1.58 xG — these matchups yield the estimated goals of 1.50 and 1.38. In the last 5 matches Chesterfield scored 6 and conceded 3 (averages 1.2 and 0.6), while Crewe scored 6 and conceded 9 (1.2 and 1.8), and both teams have a season-long Both Teams To Score rate of 59%, which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. On this basis I recommend an Over 1.5 wager as the strongest signal (82% probability), with Over 2.5 assessed at 58% and Over 3.5 at 29%, because the combined expected xG of 2.88 and seasonal Over2.5 rates (59% home, 50% away) point toward a higher goal count.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back Chesterfield to be leading at half-time and to win the match (HT/FT = 1/1), because in their last five matches Chesterfield has led at the break in 60% of games and averaged 0.8 goals in the first half over that period, while Crewe have led at the break in only 20% of their last five. The home side also show superior form and metrics: over the last five matches they average 2.2 points per game versus Crewe’s 1.2, and at home this season they win 55% of matches and average 1.55 goals per home game. A comparison of quality of play shows similar xG figures (Chesterfield xG_for 1.45 versus Crewe xG_against 1.53), but Chesterfield’s advantage in second halves is supported by an average 1.64 points in the second half compared to Crewe’s 1.23 and a 41% rate of winning the second half versus the visitors’ 27%. The risk of a draw or a guest turnaround is, however, real — half-time draws occur in 45% of the home team’s seasonal matches, and both teams score in 59% of games — therefore I also assign a moderate probability to draw scenarios and to guest comebacks.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chesterfield | Crewe Alexandra | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chesterfield is 83% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Chesterfield · 1.2 pts / match - Crewe Alexandra
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chesterfield is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
1.52 goals / match - Chesterfield · 1.45 goals / match - Crewe Alexandra
Chesterfield scores in 89% of matches (39 of 44 matches), while Crewe Alexandra keeps a clean sheet in 18% (8 of 44 matches).
Crewe Alexandra scores in 75% of matches (33 of 44 matches), while Chesterfield keeps a clean sheet in 30% (13 of 44 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chesterfield
Over / Under - Crewe Alexandra
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chesterfield is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Chesterfield · 1.32 pts / match - Crewe Alexandra
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chesterfield - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Crewe Alexandra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chesterfield
Crewe Alexandra
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Chesterfield | Liga | Crewe Alexandra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.77 | 2.56 | ▲ 2.73 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 52% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 48% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 27% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 66% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 78% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Chesterfield 0 - 1 - 0 Crewe Alexandra. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Chesterfield vs Crewe Alexandra?
The EFL League Two match finished Chesterfield 2:0 Crewe Alexandra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chesterfield vs Crewe Alexandra?
Chesterfield score 1.52 goals per game on average and Crewe Alexandra 1.45. The EFL League Two average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Chesterfield's matches and 59% of Crewe Alexandra's.
What form are Chesterfield and Crewe Alexandra in?
Over the last 5 games Chesterfield have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Crewe Alexandra 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chesterfield vs Crewe Alexandra?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chesterfield vs Crewe Alexandra: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


