United States - MLS Next ProSeatGeek StadiumData current as of 06 September 2026

Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II: match statistics

Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chicago Fire II played Inter Miami II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 14 June 2026. Venue: SeatGeek Stadium. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Chicago Fire II: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Inter Miami II: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chicago Fire II scores 1.17 and concedes 1.58 goals per match. Inter Miami II scores 1.09 and concedes 2.91. League average: 3.24 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chicago Fire II 58%, Inter Miami II 73%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire II 75%, Inter Miami II 73%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Chicago Fire II has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.39. Chicago Fire II: 12.8 shots per match, Inter Miami II: 11.3.

Match halves

Chicago Fire II: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.42. Inter Miami II: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (5 goals). Inter Miami II: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.24 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chicago Fire II possess a clear defensive edge and superior form: at home they concede on average 1.5 goals per game with xG against 1.48 and have a positive home goal differential of +1, while Inter Miami II concede 3.0 goals on average away with xG against 2.07 and carry an away goal differential of -11. Offensively the hosts score 1.67 goals per home game (xG 1.63) and record a 50% win rate at home, whereas the visitors score 1.17 goals away (xG 1.43) and have no away wins (0%). In their last five matches Chicago have scored 9 goals and average 1.2 points per game, while Inter have shipped 18 goals in their last five and have 0 points in that period. Additionally the hosts are more efficient in finishing chances – home shot conversion is 13% with an average of 3.17 shots on target, while Inter convert 10% despite 4.67 shots on target and have 0% clean sheets on the road. Given the gap in average goals conceded (1.5 vs 3.0), the visitors’ worse defensive xG (2.07 vs 1.48) and Inter’s poor recent form (5 straight defeats, 18 goals conceded), I forecast a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Strong signal for BTTS - Yes: this season Chicago Fire II have BTTS at 80% and Inter Miami II at 67%, averaging 74% versus the league rate of 61%. In the last 5 matches Inter Miami II have BTTS 100% (5/5) and Chicago 60% (3/5); Inter Miami conceded 18 goals in those 5 games (3.6 per game) while Chicago conceded 9 (1.8 per game), which significantly increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. xG supports the offensive profile of both teams: Chicago xG 1.35 vs xG against 1.91, Inter Miami xG 1.43 vs xG against 2.07 — both sides create ~1.3–1.4 xG but allow ~1.9–2.1 xG. Additionally, both teams have 0% clean sheets this season and high Over 2.5 rates (60% for Chicago and 83% for Inter Miami), further boosting the chance of goals from both teams. Considering seasonal BTTS 80%/67%, last 5 matches 60%/100%, 0% clean sheets and average concessions 1.8 and 3.6 in the last 5, I pick BTTS - Yes as the best bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have 100% of their season matches over 1.5 goals, with Over 2.5 rates of 60% for Chicago Fire II and 83% for Inter Miami II; in the last 5 matches both sides had 100% of games exceeding 2.5 goals. xG analysis shows Fire II xG_for = 1.35 versus the average xG conceded by Inter Miami II = 2.07, yielding 1.71 expected goals for the home side; similarly Inter Miami II xG_for = 1.43 against Fire II average xG conceded = 1.91 gives 1.67 expected goals for the visitors, total expected goals = 3.38. In the last 5 matches Fire II averaged 1.8 scored and 1.8 conceded (3.6 goals/match), while Inter Miami II averaged 1.2 scored and 3.6 conceded (4.8 goals/match), which increases the probability of a high-scoring game. Additionally, in 80% of home matches and 67% of away matches both teams scored, and the league goals average is 3.21; combining this with our expected 3.38 and historical Over 2.5 (roughly 71.5% between the teams), the strongest signal is Over 2.5. I rate Over 1.5 as practically certain (98%), while Over 3.5 is borderline — season Over 3.5 are 40% (Chicago) and 50% (Miami), averaging 45%, so Under 3.5 has a slight edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Chicago Fire II led at the break in 60% of their last 5 matches (3 of 5), while Inter Miami II have lost all of their last 5 fixtures (5 of 5, 100%), giving a clear home advantage. In the first 45 minutes over the last 5 games the hosts have averaged 1.2 goals scored versus the visitors conceding 1.8 goals on average (1.2 vs 1.8), so the HT lead favors Chicago Fire II. On the xG level both teams generate similar values (home xG 1.35 versus away 1.43), but the visitors’ defense is weaker (xG against 2.07 and 3.6 average goals conceded in the last 5), which increases the chance that the home side will maintain their lead through to Full-Time. Additionally Chicago register more shots on target (5.4 vs 4.67) and both teams frequently produce both teams to score this season (BTTS 80% for the hosts and 67% for the visitors), so I expect goals from both sides, but with a Chicago advantage. On this basis I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 scenario (33%), with a moderate chance of a draw or a home win following a Half-Time draw, and a low probability of a turnaround by Inter Miami II given their form.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
15Shots7
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
4Shots on target4
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.61xG1.05
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
3Corners2
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
53Dangerous attacks44
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
10Fouls11
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1Cards2
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.17Goals scored / match1.09
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.58Goals conceded / match2.91
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
50%Average possession55%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
3.58Shots on target / match5
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.75Shots per match11.27
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
3.58Shots on target5
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
9.2%Shot conversion9.7%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
50%Possession55%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.52xG for1.39
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.4xG against2
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire II: BalancedInter Miami II: Balanced
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
Accuracy (shots on target)28%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire II
LWLWL
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Inter Miami II
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W27% R73% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-8
0.27 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-4
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 3.6xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.91BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire II is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.17 goals / match - Chicago Fire II · 1.09 goals / match - Inter Miami II

Chicago Fire II is 84% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.58 goals / match - Chicago Fire II · 2.91 goals / match - Inter Miami II

Chicago Fire II scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire II scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Inter Miami II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 11 matches).

Inter Miami II scoring profile: very strong

Inter Miami II scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).

14Goals scored (season)12
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
19Goals conceded (season)32
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
2.75Average goals in match4
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
9Goals scored (last 5)6
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
9Goals conceded (last 5)18
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal73%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
25%2 goals18%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
17%3 goals9%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
8%4 goals9%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal100%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
58%2 goals82%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
25%3 goals64%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
0%4 goals36%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time27%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
8%BTTS in both halves18%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
25%Scored in both halves18%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time91%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time82%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire II is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Chicago Fire II · 1.09 pts / match - Inter Miami II

Chicago Fire II - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing
Inter Miami II - half-time state
27% leading27% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.09
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)1.18
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.82
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
58%Clean sheet before half-time27%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
50%No goal before half-time55%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

After half-time (2nd half)

0.75Points per match (2nd half)0.27
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)1.73
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
1.5Average goals (2nd half)2.18
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
25%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II
58%No goal after half-time55%
Chicago Fire IIInter Miami II

Chicago Fire II - second-half results

8% W50% R42% P
18
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter Miami II - second-half results

0% W27% R73% P
12
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4-4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Inter Miami II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.81.8
Average goals in match2.42.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%100%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-6-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chicago Fire II
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
0
16-30
5
2
31-45
2
7
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Inter Miami II
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
1
4
16-30
3
6
31-45
2
8
46-60
1
6
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chicago Fire II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Inter Miami II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.91
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
163%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Chicago Fire IILigaInter Miami II
Average goals in match 2.753.24 4.00
Both teams scored 58%62% 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%65% 73%
Clean sheets 25%21% 0%
Goal before half-time 67%75% 91%
Goal after half-time 83%83% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.24
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chicago Fire IIGoalVitaliy HlyutAssist: Robert Turdean
  2. Inter Miami IISubstitutionOn: Alejandro FloresOff: Tyler Hall
  3. Chicago Fire IIYellow cardVitaliy Hlyut
  4. Chicago Fire IIGoalRobert TurdeanAssist: Dean Boltz
  5. Inter Miami IIYellow cardMatías Damián Acevedo
  6. Inter Miami IISubstitutionOn: Mateo SajaOff: Diego Rey
  7. Inter Miami IIGoalMateo Saja
  8. Chicago Fire IISubstitutionOn: Damyan VillanuevaOff: Dean Boltz
  9. Inter Miami IIYellow cardIan Urkidi
  10. Chicago Fire IIAssistRichard Fleming

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Chicago Fire II 1 - 1 - 0 Inter Miami II. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Inter Miami II
1 : 1
Chicago Fire II
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
1 : 3
Chicago Fire Premier FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Chicago Fire II 3:1 Inter Miami II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chicago Fire II and Inter Miami II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chicago Fire II won 1, Inter Miami II won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II?

Chicago Fire II score 1.17 goals per game on average and Inter Miami II 1.09. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Chicago Fire II's matches and 73% of Inter Miami II's.

What form are Chicago Fire II and Inter Miami II in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Inter Miami II 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II?

The statistical background for Chicago Fire II vs Inter Miami II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.