Chicago Fire II vs Orlando City II: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Chicago Fire II vs Orlando City II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chicago Fire II play Orlando City II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 16 August 2026. Venue: SeatGeek Stadium.
Current form
Chicago Fire II: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Orlando City II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chicago Fire II scores 2.00 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Orlando City II scores 1.95 and concedes 1.82. League average: 3.24 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chicago Fire II 71%, Orlando City II 82%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire II 86%, Orlando City II 77%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Orlando City II has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.59. Chicago Fire II: 13.1 shots per match, Orlando City II: 13.8.
Match halves
Chicago Fire II: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.86. Orlando City II: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 1.23.
Goals by minute
Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (13 goals). Orlando City II: 61-75 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.24 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 4.33, BTTS 100%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chicago Fire II | Orlando City II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chicago Fire II is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire II · 0.8 pts / match - Orlando City II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chicago Fire II is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - Chicago Fire II · 1.82 goals / match - Orlando City II
Chicago Fire II scores in 81% of matches (17 of 21 matches), while Orlando City II keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 22 matches).
Orlando City II scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chicago Fire II
Over / Under - Orlando City II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chicago Fire II is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.62 pts / match - Chicago Fire II · 1 pts / match - Orlando City II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chicago Fire II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 38%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Orlando City II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 3.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 80% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chicago Fire II
Orlando City II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Chicago Fire II | Liga | Orlando City II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.67 | 3.24 | ▲ 3.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 71% | 61% | ▲ 82% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 86% | 66% | ▲ 77% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 22% | ▼ 5% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 75% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 83% | ▲ 95% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Chicago Fire II 1 - 0 - 2 Orlando City II. Average goals 4.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
When do Chicago Fire II and Orlando City II play?
Chicago Fire II face Orlando City II on 16 August 2026 in MLS Next Pro at SeatGeek Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Chicago Fire II and Orlando City II?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Chicago Fire II won 1, Orlando City II won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire II vs Orlando City II?
Chicago Fire II score 2.00 goals per game on average and Orlando City II 1.95. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Chicago Fire II's matches and 82% of Orlando City II's.
What form are Chicago Fire II and Orlando City II in?
Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire II have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Orlando City II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire II vs Orlando City II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chicago Fire II vs Orlando City II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.