United States - MLS Next ProSeatGeek StadiumData current as of 13 September 2026

Chicago Fire II vs Philadelphia Union II: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Chicago Fire II vs Philadelphia Union II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chicago Fire II play Philadelphia Union II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 13 September 2026. Venue: SeatGeek Stadium.

Current form

Chicago Fire II: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Philadelphia Union II: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chicago Fire II scores 1.85 and concedes 1.77 goals per match. Philadelphia Union II scores 1.31 and concedes 1.46. League average: 3.34 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chicago Fire II 65%, Philadelphia Union II 54%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire II 85%, Philadelphia Union II 54%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Chicago Fire II has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.33. Chicago Fire II: 13.5 shots per match, Philadelphia Union II: 11.1.

Match halves

Chicago Fire II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.88. Philadelphia Union II: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (13 goals). Philadelphia Union II: 16-30 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.34 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 50%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
1.85Goals scored / match1.31
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
1.77Goals conceded / match1.46
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
51%Average possession44%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
5.04Shots on target / match4.19
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.5Shots per match11.08
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
5.04Shots on target4.19
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
13.7%Shot conversion11.8%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
51%Possession44%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
1.65xG for1.33
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
1.53xG against1.76
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire II: Efficient finishingPhiladelphia Union II: Balanced
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
Accuracy (shots on target)37%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Philadelphia Union II is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Chicago Fire II · 2.4 pts / match - Philadelphia Union II

Chicago Fire II
WLWLL
Season result split
38% W19% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-5-11
1.35 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-1-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Philadelphia Union II
WWLWW
Season result split
42% W15% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-4-11
1.42 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 2.16BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire II is 41% better for: goals scored per match.

1.85 goals / match - Chicago Fire II · 1.31 goals / match - Philadelphia Union II

Philadelphia Union II is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.77 goals / match - Chicago Fire II · 1.46 goals / match - Philadelphia Union II

Chicago Fire II scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire II scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Philadelphia Union II keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 matches).

Philadelphia Union II scoring profile: very strong

Philadelphia Union II scores in 69% of matches (18 of 26 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 matches).

48Goals scored (season)34
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
46Goals conceded (season)38
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
3.62Average goals in match2.77
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
6Goals scored (last 5)12
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
11Goals conceded (last 5)10
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal69%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
54%2 goals35%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
27%3 goals15%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
12%4 goals12%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal81%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
58%2 goals35%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
27%3 goals15%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
12%4 goals12%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
Philadelphia Union II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 26 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time15%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
15%BTTS in both halves4%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
42%Scored in both halves23%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
23%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
40%BTTS - last 580%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
54%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire II is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.42 pts / match - Chicago Fire II · 1.23 pts / match - Philadelphia Union II

Chicago Fire II - half-time state
38% leading27% draw35% trailing
Philadelphia Union II - half-time state
27% leading42% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.42Points per match (1st half)1.23
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
0.96Goals scored (1st half)0.58
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
1.73Average goals (1st half)1.23
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
46%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
42%No goal before half-time62%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per match (2nd half)1.27
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.46
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
31%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II
38%No goal after half-time50%
Chicago Fire IIPhiladelphia Union II

Chicago Fire II - second-half results

35% W31% D35% L
37
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Philadelphia Union II - second-half results

27% W46% D27% L
32
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.80
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-50
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Philadelphia Union II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.6
Average goals in match2.42.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chicago Fire II
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
6
3
16-30
13
12
31-45
12
8
46-60
3
5
61-75
8
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Philadelphia Union II
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
9
2
16-30
4
9
31-45
4
3
46-60
8
8
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chicago Fire II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Philadelphia Union II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.98
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Chicago Fire IILigaPhiladelphia Union II
Average goals in match 3.623.34 2.77
Both teams scored 65%63% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 85%67% 54%
Clean sheets 19%21% 19%
Goal before half-time 85%76% 69%
Goal after half-time 92%85% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.34
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.43
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Chicago Fire II 1 - 0 - 1 Philadelphia Union II. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Philadelphia Union II
5 : 2
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
2 : 0
Philadelphia Union II

FAQ

When do Chicago Fire II and Philadelphia Union II play?

Chicago Fire II face Philadelphia Union II on 13 September 2026 in MLS Next Pro at SeatGeek Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chicago Fire II and Philadelphia Union II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Chicago Fire II won 1, Philadelphia Union II won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire II vs Philadelphia Union II?

Chicago Fire II score 1.85 goals per game on average and Philadelphia Union II 1.31. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Chicago Fire II's matches and 54% of Philadelphia Union II's.

What form are Chicago Fire II and Philadelphia Union II in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Philadelphia Union II 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire II vs Philadelphia Union II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.