United States - MLS Next ProSeatGeek StadiumData current as of 20 September 2026

Chicago Fire II vs Toronto II: match statistics

Chicago Fire II crest
Chicago Fire II
2 : 4half-time 1:2
Toronto II crest
Toronto II

Chicago Fire II vs Toronto II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chicago Fire II played Toronto II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 10 August 2026. Venue: SeatGeek Stadium. Final score: 2:4.

Current form

Chicago Fire II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Toronto II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chicago Fire II scores 2.00 and concedes 1.55 goals per match. Toronto II scores 1.55 and concedes 1.90. League average: 3.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chicago Fire II 70%, Toronto II 60%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire II 85%, Toronto II 75%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Chicago Fire II has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.25. Chicago Fire II: 12.8 shots per match, Toronto II: 10.1.

Match halves

Chicago Fire II: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.85. Toronto II: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (12 goals). Toronto II: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chicago Fire II boast a very strong home profile: they win 67% of their matches, score an average of 2.56 goals, and have a positive goal difference of +11. Toronto II lose as many as 64% of their away games, concede an average of 2.00 goals, and score just 1.27 per match. The hosts are also clearly in better form, having won 3 of their last five matches and scored 19 goals, while the visitors have suffered 4 defeats and scored only 7 goals. Chicago also hold the edge in the quality of chances created, with an average home xG of 1.75 compared with Toronto’s 1.20 away from home, while the visitors fail to score in 45% of their away matches. Toronto may take advantage of Chicago conceding an average of 1.33 goals at home, but the statistics strongly point to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Chicago Fire II have recorded BTTS in 89% of their matches this season, well above the league average of 62%, while in their last five games, both teams scored in 80% of fixtures. The hosts average 1.89 goals per match, while Toronto II concede as many as 2.00 goals per game, strongly supporting a Chicago goal. The visitors score an average of 1.27 goals, while Chicago allow opponents 1.78 goals per match and have kept a clean sheet in only 11% of games. Toronto II have a lower season BTTS rate of 36% and have failed to score in 45% of their appearances, but their current 80% BTTS run and 1.4 goals scored per match increase the likelihood of a response. The “Yes” pick is more likely because both sides’ defensive weaknesses are combined with a high current scoring frequency, particularly from the in-form hosts.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Chicago Fire II average 1.89 goals per match, while Toronto II concede as many as 2.00, clearly favoring the hosts in the goals market. In their last five matches, Chicago scored 19 goals, averaging 3.8 per game, with an xG of 1.76, while Toronto conceded 2.0 goals per match during this period. The 1.5 line was surpassed in 89% of Chicago’s matches and 73% of Toronto’s, while the league-wide average stands at a high 3.28 goals. Additionally, Over 2.5 goals landed in 100% and 80% of the teams’ last five matches respectively, making a one-goal game scenario unlikely. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5 goals, as it combines a very high historical frequency with the hosts’ attacking form and the visitors’ defensive weakness.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Chicago Fire II were leading at the break in 5 of their 9 home matches, or 56% of games, while Toronto II were trailing at half-time in 36% of their away fixtures. The hosts average 1.22 goals scored and concede just 0.44 before the break, whereas Toronto II score only 0.36 goals during this phase. Chicago’s advantage is also evident in their last five matches: the team won 60% of games and averaged 3.8 goals, while Toronto II lost 80% of matches and conceded an average of 2.0 goals. Across the season as a whole, the hosts won 56% of their matches, compared with just 18% victories for the visitors, while their average goals scored stand at 1.89 and 1.27 respectively. Although both teams have been less consistent after half-time, Chicago’s current attacking strength and Toronto’s poor away form most strongly support the HT/FT 1/1 scenario, with the hosts leading at the break and securing the win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
19Shots11
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
7Shots on target6
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
2.2xG1.52
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
4Corners0
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
72Dangerous attacks55
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
14Fouls9
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
0Cards3
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chicago Fire IIToronto II
2Goals scored / match1.55
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
1.55Goals conceded / match1.9
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
51%Average possession48%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
4.65Shots on target / match4.3
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.75Shots per match10.05
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
4.65Shots on target4.3
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
15.7%Shot conversion15.4%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
51%Possession48%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
1.56xG for1.25
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
1.49xG against1.64
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire II: Efficient finishingToronto II: Efficient finishing
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
Accuracy (shots on target)36%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire II is 233% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Chicago Fire II · 0.6 pts / match - Toronto II

Chicago Fire II
DWLWW
Season result split
40% W25% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-7
1.45 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-2
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Toronto II
LLLWL
Season result split
35% W15% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-10
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-7
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire II is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Chicago Fire II · 1.55 goals / match - Toronto II

Chicago Fire II is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.55 goals / match - Chicago Fire II · 1.9 goals / match - Toronto II

Chicago Fire II scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire II scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while Toronto II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).

Toronto II scoring profile: very strong

Toronto II scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).

40Goals scored (season)31
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
31Goals conceded (season)38
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
3.55Average goals in match3.45
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
19Goals scored (last 5)7
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal75%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
55%2 goals55%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
30%3 goals15%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
15%4 goals5%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal80%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
55%2 goals50%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
20%3 goals35%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
0%4 goals15%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time15%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
15%BTTS in both halves10%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
45%Scored in both halves25%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

BTTS and goal count

65%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
80%BTTS - last 580%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
55%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire II is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.7 pts / match - Chicago Fire II · 1.45 pts / match - Toronto II

Chicago Fire II - half-time state
45% leading35% draw20% trailing
Toronto II - half-time state
35% leading40% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.7Points per match (1st half)1.45
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
1.15Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
1.75Average goals (1st half)1.2
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
55%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
35%No goal before half-time50%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per match (2nd half)0.8
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
0.85Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
0.95Goals conceded (2nd half)1.45
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
1.8Average goals (2nd half)2.25
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
25%Clean sheet after half-time30%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II
40%No goal after half-time50%
Chicago Fire IIToronto II

Chicago Fire II - second-half results

30% W40% D30% L
34
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 40%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Toronto II - second-half results

15% W35% D50% L
29
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.20
Goals scored / match2.21.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match3.22.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%80%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+6+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 11
Toronto II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chicago Fire II
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
6
1
16-30
12
6
31-45
8
8
46-60
2
4
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Toronto II
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
4
8
46-60
6
6
61-75
6
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chicago Fire II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Toronto II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Chicago Fire IILigaToronto II
Average goals in match 3.553.23 3.45
Both teams scored 70%61% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 85%65% 75%
Clean sheets 20%22% 20%
Goal before half-time 80%75% 70%
Goal after half-time 90%83% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / match
1.40
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Toronto IIYellow cardAdisa De Rosario
  2. Chicago Fire IIGoalDamyan VillanuevaAssist: Damian Nigg
  3. Chicago Fire IISubstitutionOn: Tidiane DiawaraOff: Dean Boltz
  4. Toronto IIYellow cardMicah Chisholm
  5. Chicago Fire IIGoalTidiane Diawara
  6. Toronto IIYellow cardBryce Richard Boneau

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Chicago Fire II 2 - 0 - 1 Toronto II. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Toronto FC II USL
2 : 3
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
Toronto FC II USL
2 : 0
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
1 : 0
Toronto FC II USL

FAQ

What was the result of Chicago Fire II vs Toronto II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Chicago Fire II 2:4 Toronto II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Chicago Fire II and Toronto II?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Chicago Fire II won 2, Toronto II won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire II vs Toronto II?

Chicago Fire II score 2.00 goals per game on average and Toronto II 1.55. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Chicago Fire II's matches and 60% of Toronto II's.

What form are Chicago Fire II and Toronto II in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire II have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Toronto II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire II vs Toronto II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.