Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC: match statistics
Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chicago Fire played Atlanta United FC in MLS (United States). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Chicago Fire: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Atlanta United FC: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chicago Fire scores 1.33 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Atlanta United FC scores 1.00 and concedes 1.83. League average: 3.08 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chicago Fire 50%, Atlanta United FC 50%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire 67%, Atlanta United FC 50%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 63%.
xG, shots and style
Chicago Fire has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.06. Chicago Fire: 11.2 shots per match, Atlanta United FC: 9.3.
Match halves
Chicago Fire: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.67. Atlanta United FC: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Chicago Fire: 76-90+ (3 goals). Atlanta United FC: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS: 3.08 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 63%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chicago Fire have a clear home advantage: at home they average 1.67 goals scored and 0.67 conceded per game, with an average xG of 1.57 and 5.33 shots on target. Atlanta United are almost barren away — 0.0 goals scored and 2.0 conceded on average per away match, xG 0.86, just 2 shots on target and 100% of matches without a goal (FTS 100%). In the last 5 fixtures Chicago scored 7 goals and hold a 3-1-1 record (PPG 2.0), while Atlanta have 1 win in their last 5 and PPG 0.8, conceding 9 goals in that period. Additionally, hosts have 67% wins and 67% clean sheets at home, whereas visitors have 0% wins and 0% clean sheets on the road; the superiority in shot conversion (12% vs 0%) and higher xG strongly favor Chicago.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Analysis indicates BTTS - Yes: Chicago has a season BTTS rate of 75% and at home averages 1.5 goals scored while conceding 1.75 per match, whereas Atlanta concedes 2.0 goals on the road and has not recorded a clean sheet away (0%), increasing the likelihood of a home goal. Atlanta has 0.0 goals on the road for the season, but in the last 5 matches scored 6 goals (1.2 avg) and has BTTS of 60% in that span, while Chicago had BTTS of 40% in their last 5 and conceded only 3 goals (0.6 avg), which is a mixed signal but shows Atlanta can score. Chicago creates more chances: attacking xG 1.17 vs Atlanta 0.86, on average 10 vs 8 shots and 4.0 vs 2.0 shots on target, increasing the probability that the home side will convert at least one opportunity. Atlanta’s poor defence (11 goals conceded this season and 2.0 conceded on the road) and the lack of away clean sheets (0%) argue that the opponent will concede; the league records BTTS 53%, which further supports the both-teams-to-score scenario. Considering Chicago’s 75% BTTS, Atlanta’s 0% away clean sheets, Atlanta’s 60% BTTS in the last 5, and Chicago’s advantage in xG and shots, I assign 68% to 'yes' and 32% to 'no'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimated expected goals at 1.33 for Chicago and 1.07 for Atlanta (total 2.40). Offensive xG are 1.17 for Chicago and 0.86 for Atlanta, and over the last 5 matches xG rose to 1.40 and 1.09 respectively, supporting a higher home potential. Chicago scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4) and conceded 3 (0.6), while Atlanta has 6 scored and 9 conceded in the last 5 (1.2/1.8); shot stats 10/4 vs 8/2 indicate Chicago’s advantage. With an expected total of 2.40 the Poisson model gives P(Over1.5)≈69%, P(Over2.5)≈43% and P(Over3.5)≈22%; additionally seasonal Over1.5 rates are 75% for Chicago and 100% for Atlanta, which further supports Over 1.5 as the best line to play.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is X/1 (draw at half-time, Chicago win at full-time) with a probability of 24%. In Chicago’s last 5 matches they were level at the break in 60% of cases (3 of 5), and they also won 60% of their matches (3 of 5), which suggests frequent turnarounds after a draw at the break. The home side shows superior offensive metrics: xG 1.17 versus Atlanta’s 0.86, on average 4 shots on target vs 2 and a conversion rate of 15% vs 0%, and they have scored 2 goals in minutes 46–60 and 2 goals in minutes 61–75 (4 second-half goals in total), which increases the chance of scoring after the break. Atlanta’s away season average goals is 0.0 and they have only a 20% win rate in their last 5 matches, so the visitors rarely produce a turnaround, hence X/1 as the strongest signal (24%) with 1/1 as the main alternative (22%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chicago Fire | Atlanta United FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chicago Fire is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Chicago Fire · 0.8 pts / match - Atlanta United FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chicago Fire is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 1 goals / match - Atlanta United FC
Chicago Fire is 120% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.83 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 1.83 goals / match - Atlanta United FC
Chicago Fire scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Atlanta United FC keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
Atlanta United FC scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chicago Fire
Over / Under - Atlanta United FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chicago Fire is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / match - Chicago Fire · 1 pts / match - Atlanta United FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chicago Fire - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Atlanta United FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chicago Fire
Atlanta United FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Chicago Fire | Liga | Atlanta United FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.17 | 3.08 | ▼ 2.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 63% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 26% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 73% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 82% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC?
The MLS match finished Chicago Fire 1:0 Atlanta United FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC?
Chicago Fire score 1.33 goals per game on average and Atlanta United FC 1.00. The MLS average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Chicago Fire's matches and 50% of Atlanta United FC's.
What form are Chicago Fire and Atlanta United FC in?
Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Atlanta United FC 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC?
The statistical background for Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


