United States - MLSData current as of 13 September 2026

Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC: match statistics

Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chicago Fire played Atlanta United FC in MLS (United States). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Chicago Fire: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Atlanta United FC: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chicago Fire scores 1.33 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Atlanta United FC scores 1.00 and concedes 1.83. League average: 3.08 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chicago Fire 50%, Atlanta United FC 50%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire 67%, Atlanta United FC 50%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Chicago Fire has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.06. Chicago Fire: 11.2 shots per match, Atlanta United FC: 9.3.

Match halves

Chicago Fire: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.67. Atlanta United FC: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Chicago Fire: 76-90+ (3 goals). Atlanta United FC: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.08 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chicago Fire have a clear home advantage: at home they average 1.67 goals scored and 0.67 conceded per game, with an average xG of 1.57 and 5.33 shots on target. Atlanta United are almost barren away — 0.0 goals scored and 2.0 conceded on average per away match, xG 0.86, just 2 shots on target and 100% of matches without a goal (FTS 100%). In the last 5 fixtures Chicago scored 7 goals and hold a 3-1-1 record (PPG 2.0), while Atlanta have 1 win in their last 5 and PPG 0.8, conceding 9 goals in that period. Additionally, hosts have 67% wins and 67% clean sheets at home, whereas visitors have 0% wins and 0% clean sheets on the road; the superiority in shot conversion (12% vs 0%) and higher xG strongly favor Chicago.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Analysis indicates BTTS - Yes: Chicago has a season BTTS rate of 75% and at home averages 1.5 goals scored while conceding 1.75 per match, whereas Atlanta concedes 2.0 goals on the road and has not recorded a clean sheet away (0%), increasing the likelihood of a home goal. Atlanta has 0.0 goals on the road for the season, but in the last 5 matches scored 6 goals (1.2 avg) and has BTTS of 60% in that span, while Chicago had BTTS of 40% in their last 5 and conceded only 3 goals (0.6 avg), which is a mixed signal but shows Atlanta can score. Chicago creates more chances: attacking xG 1.17 vs Atlanta 0.86, on average 10 vs 8 shots and 4.0 vs 2.0 shots on target, increasing the probability that the home side will convert at least one opportunity. Atlanta’s poor defence (11 goals conceded this season and 2.0 conceded on the road) and the lack of away clean sheets (0%) argue that the opponent will concede; the league records BTTS 53%, which further supports the both-teams-to-score scenario. Considering Chicago’s 75% BTTS, Atlanta’s 0% away clean sheets, Atlanta’s 60% BTTS in the last 5, and Chicago’s advantage in xG and shots, I assign 68% to 'yes' and 32% to 'no'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimated expected goals at 1.33 for Chicago and 1.07 for Atlanta (total 2.40). Offensive xG are 1.17 for Chicago and 0.86 for Atlanta, and over the last 5 matches xG rose to 1.40 and 1.09 respectively, supporting a higher home potential. Chicago scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4) and conceded 3 (0.6), while Atlanta has 6 scored and 9 conceded in the last 5 (1.2/1.8); shot stats 10/4 vs 8/2 indicate Chicago’s advantage. With an expected total of 2.40 the Poisson model gives P(Over1.5)≈69%, P(Over2.5)≈43% and P(Over3.5)≈22%; additionally seasonal Over1.5 rates are 75% for Chicago and 100% for Atlanta, which further supports Over 1.5 as the best line to play.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is X/1 (draw at half-time, Chicago win at full-time) with a probability of 24%. In Chicago’s last 5 matches they were level at the break in 60% of cases (3 of 5), and they also won 60% of their matches (3 of 5), which suggests frequent turnarounds after a draw at the break. The home side shows superior offensive metrics: xG 1.17 versus Atlanta’s 0.86, on average 4 shots on target vs 2 and a conversion rate of 15% vs 0%, and they have scored 2 goals in minutes 46–60 and 2 goals in minutes 61–75 (4 second-half goals in total), which increases the chance of scoring after the break. Atlanta’s away season average goals is 0.0 and they have only a 20% win rate in their last 5 matches, so the visitors rarely produce a turnaround, hence X/1 as the strongest signal (24%) with 1/1 as the main alternative (22%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
18Shots20
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
3Shots on target6
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
1.72xG2.2
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
6Corners11
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
52Dangerous attacks73
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
12Fouls5
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
2Cards1
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
1.33Goals scored / match1
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0.83Goals conceded / match1.83
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
52%Average possession56%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
4.33Shots on target / match3.33
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.17Shots per match9.33
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
4.33Shots on target3.33
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
11.9%Shot conversion10.7%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
52%Possession56%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
1.32xG for1.06
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
1.21xG against1.28
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire: BalancedAtlanta United FC: Balanced
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
Accuracy (shots on target)39%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Chicago Fire · 0.8 pts / match - Atlanta United FC

Chicago Fire
WDLWW
Season result split
50% W17% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-2
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Atlanta United FC
LLWDL
Season result split
17% W17% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-4
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 1 goals / match - Atlanta United FC

Chicago Fire is 120% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 1.83 goals / match - Atlanta United FC

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Atlanta United FC keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

Atlanta United FC scoring profile: mixed

Atlanta United FC scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).

8Goals scored (season)6
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
5Goals conceded (season)11
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
2.17Average goals in match2.83
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal50%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
33%2 goals33%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
17%3 goals17%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0%4 goals0%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal83%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
33%2 goals67%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0%3 goals33%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0%4 goals0%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
33%Scored in both halves33%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
40%BTTS - last 560%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Chicago Fire · 1 pts / match - Atlanta United FC

Chicago Fire - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Atlanta United FC - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0.17Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0.83Average goals (1st half)1
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
83%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
33%No goal before half-time67%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.17
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1.17
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.83
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
67%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC
50%No goal after half-time50%
Chicago FireAtlanta United FC

Chicago Fire - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
12
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Atlanta United FC - second-half results

33% W17% D50% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Atlanta United FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Atlanta United FC
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
81%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Atlanta United FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Chicago FireLigaAtlanta United FC
Average goals in match 2.173.08 2.83
Both teams scored 50%55% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%63% 50%
Clean sheets 50%26% 17%
Goal before half-time 67%73% 50%
Goal after half-time 67%82% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.08
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.93
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+68%
Home attack advantage
+40%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Atlanta United FCYellow cardTomás Jacob
  2. Chicago FireYellow cardPhilip Aksel Frigast Zinckernagel
  3. Chicago FireGoalMaren Haile-SelassieAssist: Jonathan Bamba
  4. Chicago FireYellow cardLeonardo José Caetano Barroso
  5. Atlanta United FCSubstitutionOn: Steven AlzateOff: Cooper Sanchez
  6. Atlanta United FCSubstitutionOn: Ajani FortuneOff: Matías Galarza Fonda

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Drew FischerMatches officiated: 11
5.09Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 255%Home wins18%Draws27%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC?

The MLS match finished Chicago Fire 1:0 Atlanta United FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC?

Chicago Fire score 1.33 goals per game on average and Atlanta United FC 1.00. The MLS average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Chicago Fire's matches and 50% of Atlanta United FC's.

What form are Chicago Fire and Atlanta United FC in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Atlanta United FC 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC?

The statistical background for Chicago Fire vs Atlanta United FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.