United States - MLSData current as of 06 September 2026

Chicago Fire vs Montreal Impact: match statistics

Chicago Fire crest
Chicago Fire
3 : 0half-time 1:0
Montreal Impact crest
Montreal Impact
165%(1.61)
X22%(4.32)
213%(4.40)

Chicago Fire clearly outperforms Montreal Impact in terms of form and offensive efficiency. The hosts have scored 8 goals while conceding 10 in their last 5 matches, whereas the visitors recorded merely 5 goals with as many as 12 conceded. Montreal Impact suffers from disastrous away form – 100% losses, 0% goals scored on the road, and an average of 5 conceded goals per match. Additionally, the visitors' negative goal difference (-5), very low possession (31%), and conversion rate (0%) indicate huge problems in creating scoring chances. Despite one defeat this season, Chicago Fire holds the home advantage and significantly better shooting form, making them the clear favorite for this encounter. xG statistics also speak in favor of the hosts, who should control the match and effectively exploit Montreal's defensive weaknesses.

Chicago Fire vs Montreal Impact: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chicago Fire played Montreal Impact in MLS (United States). The match was played on 28 February 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Chicago Fire: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match. Montreal Impact: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chicago Fire scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Montreal Impact scores 0.00 and concedes 5.00. League average: 3.07 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chicago Fire 100%, Montreal Impact 0%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire 100%, Montreal Impact 100%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Chicago Fire has higher xG: 0.91 vs 0.69. Chicago Fire: 6.0 shots per match, Montreal Impact: 6.0.

Match halves

Chicago Fire: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.00. Montreal Impact: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Chicago Fire: 31-45+ (1 goals). Montreal Impact: 0-15 (0 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.07 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chicago Fire clearly outperforms Montreal Impact in terms of form and offensive efficiency. The hosts have scored 8 goals while conceding 10 in their last 5 matches, whereas the visitors recorded merely 5 goals with as many as 12 conceded. Montreal Impact suffers from disastrous away form – 100% losses, 0% goals scored on the road, and an average of 5 conceded goals per match. Additionally, the visitors' negative goal difference (-5), very low possession (31%), and conversion rate (0%) indicate huge problems in creating scoring chances. Despite one defeat this season, Chicago Fire holds the home advantage and significantly better shooting form, making them the clear favorite for this encounter. xG statistics also speak in favor of the hosts, who should control the match and effectively exploit Montreal's defensive weaknesses.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
17Shots4
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
11Shots on target2
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
2.08xG0.61
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
9Corners3
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
33Dangerous attacks28
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
12Fouls13
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
3Cards2
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chicago FireMontreal Impact
1Goals scored / match0
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
2Goals conceded / match5
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
57%Average possession31%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
3Shots on target / match2
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6Shots per match6
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
3Shots on target2
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
16.7%Shot conversion0%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
57%Possession31%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0.91xG for0.69
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
1.07xG against1.38
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire: Efficient finishingMontreal Impact: Balanced
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
Accuracy (shots on target)50%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire
L
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% R100% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Montreal Impact
L
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% R100% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 5.0xG: 0.69Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 150% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 5 goals / match - Montreal Impact

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

Montreal Impact scoring profile: mixed

Montreal Impact scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

1Goals scored (season)0
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
2Goals conceded (season)5
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
3Average goals in match5
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
1Goals scored (last 5)0
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
2Goals conceded (last 5)5
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal0%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0%2 goals0%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0%3 goals0%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0%4 goals0%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
100%2 goals100%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0%3 goals100%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0%4 goals100%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0%Scored in both halves0%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS100%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
100%BTTS - last 50%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time100%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time100%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
Montreal Impact - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per match (1st half)0
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
1Goals scored (1st half)0
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0Goals conceded (1st half)2
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
1Average goals (1st half)2
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
100%Clean sheet before half-time0%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0%No goal before half-time100%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per match (2nd half)0
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0Goals scored (2nd half)0
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
2Goals conceded (2nd half)3
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
2Average goals (2nd half)3
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
100%No goal after half-time100%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

Chicago Fire - second-half results

0% W0% R100% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+2.0

Concedes 2.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Montreal Impact - second-half results

0% W0% R100% P
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.000.00
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.02.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Montreal Impact - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.000.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match2.03.0
Average goals in match2.03.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%100%
3 goals0%100%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Montreal Impact
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
3.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
130%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.93
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
44%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
250%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Montreal Impact

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.69
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-4.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.69
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-3.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
220%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Chicago FireLigaMontreal Impact
Average goals in match 3.003.07 5.00
Both teams scored 100%53% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%60% 100%
Clean sheets 0%23% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%80% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%93% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.07
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
2.27
Home goals / match
0.80
Away goals / match
+184%
Home attack advantage
+65%
Home defence advantage
+66%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
93%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Montreal ImpactYellow cardBrayan Emanuel Vera Ramírez
  2. Chicago FireYellow cardPhilip Aksel Frigast Zinckernagel
  3. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Brandan CraigOff: Jalen Neal
  4. Montreal ImpactYellow cardIván Jaime Pajuelo
  5. Chicago FireRed cardRobert Jonathan Dean Jr
  6. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Joel WatermanOff: Jonathan Bamba
  7. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Daniel Armando Ríos CalderónOff: Iván Jaime Pajuelo
  8. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Wikelman José Carmona TorresOff: Matthew Longstaff
  9. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Dje Tah D'AvillaOff: Mauricio Pineda
  10. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Robin LodOff: Philip Aksel Frigast Zinckernagel
  11. Chicago FireGoalHugo Jean-Marc Cuypers

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Chicago Fire vs Montreal Impact?

The MLS match finished Chicago Fire 3:0 Montreal Impact. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire vs Montreal Impact?

Chicago Fire score 1.00 goals per game on average and Montreal Impact 0.00. The MLS average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Chicago Fire's matches and 0% of Montreal Impact's.

What form are Chicago Fire and Montreal Impact in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Montreal Impact 0-0-1 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire vs Montreal Impact?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.