United States - MLSData current as of 23 July 2026

Chicago Fire vs Montreal Impact: match statistics

Chicago Fire crest
Chicago Fire
3 : 0half-time 1:0
Montreal Impact crest
Montreal Impact
165%(1.61)
X22%(4.32)
213%(4.40)

Chicago Fire clearly outperforms Montreal Impact in terms of form and offensive efficiency. The hosts have scored 8 goals while conceding 10 in their last 5 matches, whereas the visitors recorded merely 5 goals with as many as 12 conceded. Montreal Impact suffers from disastrous away form – 100% losses, 0% goals scored on the road, and an average of 5 conceded goals per match. Additionally, the visitors' negative goal difference (-5), very low possession (31%), and conversion rate (0%) indicate huge problems in creating scoring chances. Despite one defeat this season, Chicago Fire holds the home advantage and significantly better shooting form, making them the clear favorite for this encounter. xG statistics also speak in favor of the hosts, who should control the match and effectively exploit Montreal's defensive weaknesses.

Chicago Fire vs Montreal Impact: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chicago Fire play Montreal Impact in MLS (United States). The match date is 28 February 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Chicago Fire: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Montreal Impact: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chicago Fire scores 1.93 and concedes 1.27 goals per match. Montreal Impact scores 1.47 and concedes 2.07. League average: 3.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chicago Fire 60%, Montreal Impact 47%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire 73%, Montreal Impact 73%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Chicago Fire has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.52. Chicago Fire: 14.9 shots per match, Montreal Impact: 13.8.

Match halves

Chicago Fire: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.13. Montreal Impact: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Chicago Fire: 61-75 (7 goals). Montreal Impact: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.31 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Chicago Fire clearly outperforms Montreal Impact in terms of form and offensive efficiency. The hosts have scored 8 goals while conceding 10 in their last 5 matches, whereas the visitors recorded merely 5 goals with as many as 12 conceded. Montreal Impact suffers from disastrous away form – 100% losses, 0% goals scored on the road, and an average of 5 conceded goals per match. Additionally, the visitors' negative goal difference (-5), very low possession (31%), and conversion rate (0%) indicate huge problems in creating scoring chances. Despite one defeat this season, Chicago Fire holds the home advantage and significantly better shooting form, making them the clear favorite for this encounter. xG statistics also speak in favor of the hosts, who should control the match and effectively exploit Montreal's defensive weaknesses.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
17Shots4
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
11Shots on target2
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
2.08xG0.61
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
9Corners3
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
33Dangerous attacks28
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
12Fouls13
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
3Cards2
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chicago FireMontreal Impact
1.93Goals scored / match1.47
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
1.27Goals conceded / match2.07
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
53%Average possession49%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
5.13Shots on target / match4.93
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.87Shots per match13.8
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
5.13Shots on target4.93
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
13%Shot conversion10.6%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
53%Possession49%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
1.64xG for1.52
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
1.41xG against1.39
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire: AttackingMontreal Impact: Balanced
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
Accuracy (shots on target)34%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire · 1.2 pts / match - Montreal Impact

Chicago Fire
LWWWL
Season result split
53% W13% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-5
1.73 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Montreal Impact
WDLDD
Season result split
27% W20% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-6
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.02Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

1.93 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 1.47 goals / match - Montreal Impact

Chicago Fire is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.27 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 2.07 goals / match - Montreal Impact

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 93% of matches (14 of 15 matches), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

Montreal Impact scoring profile: strong

Montreal Impact scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

29Goals scored (season)22
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
19Goals conceded (season)31
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
3.2Average goals in match3.53
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
10Goals scored (last 5)8
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

How often they score at least...

93%1 goal67%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
60%2 goals40%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
27%3 goals27%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
7%4 goals13%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal73%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
40%2 goals67%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
27%3 goals40%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0%4 goals20%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time33%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
13%BTTS in both halves13%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
40%Scored in both halves27%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS27%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
80%BTTS - last 540%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time87%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Chicago Fire · 1.33 pts / match - Montreal Impact

Chicago Fire - half-time state
40% leading47% draw13% trailing
Montreal Impact - half-time state
40% leading13% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)1.33
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.87
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.87
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.73
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
53%Clean sheet before half-time40%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
33%No goal before half-time40%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
1.13Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)1.2
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
1.87Average goals (2nd half)1.8
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
60%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact
33%No goal after half-time67%
Chicago FireMontreal Impact

Chicago Fire - second-half results

40% W20% R40% P
25
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Montreal Impact - second-half results

27% W20% R53% P
20
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding68%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Montreal Impact - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
6
2
16-30
3
6
31-45
3
2
46-60
7
1
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Montreal Impact
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
3
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
1
7
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.37
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Montreal Impact

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Chicago FireLigaMontreal Impact
Average goals in match 3.203.31 3.53
Both teams scored 60%61% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%63% 73%
Clean sheets 40%22% 27%
Goal before half-time 80%77% 87%
Goal after half-time 80%80% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.31
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.92
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Chicago Fire 1 - 0 - 0 Montreal Impact. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Chicago Fire vs Montreal Impact?

The MLS match finished Chicago Fire 3:0 Montreal Impact. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire vs Montreal Impact?

Chicago Fire score 1.93 goals per game on average and Montreal Impact 1.47. The MLS average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Chicago Fire's matches and 47% of Montreal Impact's.

What form are Chicago Fire and Montreal Impact in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Montreal Impact 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire vs Montreal Impact?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.