United States - MLSSoldier FieldData current as of 15 October 2026

Chicago Fire vs New York City: match statistics

Chicago Fire crest
Chicago Fire
2 : 1half-time 0:1
New York City crest
New York City

Chicago Fire vs New York City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chicago Fire played New York City in MLS (United States). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: Soldier Field. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Chicago Fire: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. New York City: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chicago Fire scores 1.81 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. New York City scores 1.52 and concedes 1.33. League average: 3.22 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chicago Fire 70%, New York City 67%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire 74%, New York City 52%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Chicago Fire has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.34. Chicago Fire: 14.3 shots per match, New York City: 11.6.

Match halves

Chicago Fire: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 1.00. New York City: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.59.

Goals by minute

Chicago Fire: 61-75 (11 goals). New York City: 16-30 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.22 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chicago Fire have a clear home advantage: they have won 58% of their home matches and score an average of 1.83 goals per game there, while New York City have won 31% of their away matches and average 1.15 goals. The hosts also create more chances—their average home xG is 1.76, compared with 1.13 for the visitors away from home, and they record 5.33 shots on target per game to the visitors’ 3.85. New York City’s away defence concedes chances worth an average xG of 1.50, further strengthening the case for a Chicago goal. Caution is warranted, however, as both teams have won just 1 of their last 5 matches, while Chicago conceded 10 goals in that period compared with 5 for their opponents. Despite the hosts’ recent defensive struggles, their superior finishing and chance quality at home make a Chicago win the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS has landed in 64% of Chicago Fire’s matches and 69% of New York City’s, so the full-season data points towards goals for both teams. Chicago average 1.86 goals per match, while New York City concede 1.15, giving the hosts a solid basis for finding the net. The visitors score an average of 1.15 goals, while Chicago concede 1.50; however, their average xG of 1.13 indicates less attacking threat than the hosts, whose xG stands at 1.53. The last five matches warrant caution: BTTS landed in 60% of Chicago’s games, but in only 40% of New York City’s. Despite this weaker recent signal, the season-long BTTS frequency and Chicago’s defensive vulnerability make both teams to score the more likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals: this threshold was reached in 86% of Chicago matches and 85% of New York City matches. The hosts average 1.86 goals scored, while the visitors concede 1.15; meanwhile, Chicago concede 1.50 goals per game, compared with New York City's average of 1.15 goals scored. The hosts' attacking potential is reflected in an average xG of 1.53 and 5.29 shots on target per match, versus 1.13 xG and 3.85 shots on target for the visitors. The Over 2.5 goals line is less reliable, having landed in 64% of Chicago matches but only 38% of New York City matches. Therefore, with a forecast of 2.79 total goals, Over 1.5 goals offers a clearer edge than the higher lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw is likely, as New York City were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, while Chicago averaged just 0.4 goals before half-time over the same period. The hosts do, however, have the potential to take the lead: their average xG is 1.53 compared with the visitors’ 1.13, and they register 5.29 shots on target per match against 3.85. New York City’s more solid defence also supports the draw, with the hosts conceding an average of 1.15 goals per match, compared with Chicago’s 1.50. In addition, the visitors have drawn 38% of their matches this season, and both teams have recorded 2 draws in their last 5 matches. Therefore, X/X is a slightly stronger pick than a home win, although the hosts’ attacking advantage means a draw cannot be considered a certain outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Chicago FireNew York City
14Shots12
Chicago FireNew York City
4Shots on target6
Chicago FireNew York City
1.5xG1.42
Chicago FireNew York City
4Corners4
Chicago FireNew York City
46Dangerous attacks34
Chicago FireNew York City
18Fouls10
Chicago FireNew York City
4Cards0
Chicago FireNew York City

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chicago FireNew York City
1.81Goals scored / match1.52
Chicago FireNew York City
1.44Goals conceded / match1.33
Chicago FireNew York City
52%Average possession54%
Chicago FireNew York City
5.26Shots on target / match4.59
Chicago FireNew York City

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.33Shots per match11.56
Chicago FireNew York City
5.26Shots on target4.59
Chicago FireNew York City
12.7%Shot conversion13.1%
Chicago FireNew York City
52%Possession54%
Chicago FireNew York City
1.61xG for1.34
Chicago FireNew York City
1.42xG against1.41
Chicago FireNew York City

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire: AttackingNew York City: Efficient finishing
Chicago FireNew York City
Accuracy (shots on target)37%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Chicago Fire · 1 pts / match - New York City

Chicago Fire
DLLWW
Season result split
48% W22% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-6-8
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-1-4
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
New York City
DLWLD
Season result split
30% W33% D37% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-10
1.22 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-4
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LDDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.81 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 1.52 goals / match - New York City

New York City is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.44 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 1.33 goals / match - New York City

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 93% of matches (25 of 27 matches), while New York City keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 matches).

New York City scoring profile: very strong

New York City scores in 81% of matches (22 of 27 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 26% (7 of 27 matches).

49Goals scored (season)41
Chicago FireNew York City
39Goals conceded (season)36
Chicago FireNew York City
3.26Average goals in match2.85
Chicago FireNew York City
6Goals scored (last 5)5
Chicago FireNew York City
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Chicago FireNew York City

How often they score at least...

93%1 goal81%
Chicago FireNew York City
56%2 goals41%
Chicago FireNew York City
22%3 goals19%
Chicago FireNew York City
7%4 goals7%
Chicago FireNew York City

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal81%
Chicago FireNew York City
41%2 goals37%
Chicago FireNew York City
26%3 goals11%
Chicago FireNew York City
4%4 goals4%
Chicago FireNew York City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time33%
Chicago FireNew York City
15%BTTS in both halves11%
Chicago FireNew York City
41%Scored in both halves33%
Chicago FireNew York City

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Chicago FireNew York City
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Chicago FireNew York City
60%BTTS - last 540%
Chicago FireNew York City

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
Chicago FireNew York City
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Chicago FireNew York City
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Chicago FireNew York City

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Chicago FireNew York City
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
Chicago FireNew York City
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
Chicago FireNew York City

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire - half-time state
41% leading37% draw22% trailing
New York City - half-time state
41% leading37% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.59Points per match (1st half)1.59
Chicago FireNew York City
0.81Goals scored (1st half)0.93
Chicago FireNew York City
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
Chicago FireNew York City
1.44Average goals (1st half)1.48
Chicago FireNew York City
52%Clean sheet before half-time44%
Chicago FireNew York City
30%No goal before half-time37%
Chicago FireNew York City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per match (2nd half)1.07
Chicago FireNew York City
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.59
Chicago FireNew York City
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
Chicago FireNew York City
1.81Average goals (2nd half)1.37
Chicago FireNew York City
44%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Chicago FireNew York City
37%No goal after half-time48%
Chicago FireNew York City

Chicago Fire - second-half results

37% W26% D37% L
43
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

New York City - second-half results

22% W41% D37% L
43
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding73%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 30%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
New York City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
8
5
16-30
5
10
31-45
7
7
46-60
11
2
61-75
9
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

New York City
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
10
4
16-30
9
6
31-45
7
4
46-60
5
8
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.05
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

New York City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Chicago FireLigaNew York City
Average goals in match• 3.263.22▼ 2.85
Both teams scored▲ 70%63%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 74%63%▼ 52%
Clean sheets▲ 26%21%▼ 19%
Goal before half-time▲ 85%78%▲ 85%
Goal after half-time▲ 85%82%▼ 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.22
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. New York CityGoalHannes WolfAssist: Agustin Ojeda
  2. Chicago FireYellow cardDje Tah D'Avilla
  3. Chicago FireYellow cardDje Tah D'Avilla
  4. New York CitySubstitutionOn: Kevin O'TooleOff: Nico Cavallo
  5. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Mauricio PinedaOff: Jonathan Bamba
  6. Chicago FireYellow cardMbekezeli Mbokazi
  7. New York CitySubstitutionOn: Bénie TraoreOff: Agustin Ojeda
  8. New York CitySubstitutionOn: Jonathan ShoreOff: James Sands
  9. New York CitySubstitutionOn: Malachi JonesOff: Hannes Wolf
  10. Chicago FireGoalMaren Haile-Selassie
  11. Chicago FireYellow cardMauricio Pineda

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Chicago Fire 0 - 0 - 1 New York City. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Chicago Fire vs New York City?

The MLS match finished Chicago Fire 2:1 New York City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire vs New York City?

Chicago Fire score 1.81 goals per game on average and New York City 1.52. The MLS average is 3.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Chicago Fire's matches and 67% of New York City's.

What form are Chicago Fire and New York City in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and New York City 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire vs New York City?

The statistical background for Chicago Fire vs New York City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.