United States - MLSData current as of 07 September 2026

Chicago Fire vs New York RB: match statistics

Chicago Fire crest
Chicago Fire
1 : 3half-time 0:1
New York RB crest
New York RB

Chicago Fire vs New York RB: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chicago Fire played New York RB in MLS (United States). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Chicago Fire: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. New York RB: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chicago Fire scores 1.90 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. New York RB scores 1.45 and concedes 2.45. League average: 3.20 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chicago Fire 50%, New York RB 64%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire 70%, New York RB 64%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Chicago Fire: 15.3 shots per match, New York RB: 14.3.

Match halves

Chicago Fire: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00. New York RB: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.91.

Goals by minute

Chicago Fire: 76-90+ (5 goals). New York RB: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chicago Fire enjoy a clear statistical advantage at home: they score 2.17 goals per home match and concede 0.83, with xG 1.97 versus xG against 1.20 and a home goal difference of +8. New York RB away average is just 1.17 goals scored and 2.67 conceded, with xG for 1.77 and xG against 1.56 and a negative goal difference of -9, indicating defensive issues for the visitors. Recent form further favors the hosts — Chicago have scored 13 goals in the last 5 matches and average 1.4 points per game in that period, while New York have only 6 goals, 0.2 points per game and 0 wins in the last 5. Additionally, the hosts are more efficient in front of goal (conversion rate 12% vs 8% for the visitors), have 67% of home matches with a clean sheet while NYRB have 0% clean sheets on the road, and 67% home win rate vs 17% away wins for the visitors. Based on these numbers I predict a Chicago Fire victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Defensive and attacking metrics point to a high likelihood of goals at both ends: New York RB concedes an average of 2.67 goals per game this season and as many as 3.0 goals in the last 5 matches, while Chicago Fire scores an average of 2.6 goals in the last 5 games (compared to NYRB’s 1.2 in the same period). Additionally, NYRB’s season BTTS rate is 83%, and Chicago’s season BTTS is 40% but 80% over the last 5 matches, indicating that despite a lower seasonal percentage Chicago has recently been involved in many Goal/Goal games. Scoring potential is visible in xG and shots: seasonal average xG is 1.77 for NYRB and 1.57 for Chicago, while in the last 5 matches Chicago has xG 1.87 versus NYRB 1.41; NYRB also averages 6.17 shots on target per game versus Chicago’s 3.8, which increases the chances of both teams scoring. NYRB have no clean sheets (0% clean sheets this season) and Chicago’s clean sheet rate is low (20%), which further boosts BTTS probability, and NYRB’s 27 goals conceded this season confirms the visitors’ defensive weakness. Considering NYRB’s 83% season BTTS, Chicago’s 80% BTTS in the last 5, high average goals and xG, and NYRB’s weak defense, I assess 'BTTS - Yes' at 78% and 'BTTS - No' at 22%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I recommend Over 1.5 because both teams have weak defenses: Chicago concedes 2.2 goals per match on average, and New York RB concedes 2.67 (in the last 5 matches NYRB concedes even 3.0). Based on xG: home xG 1.57 and xG against NYRB 1.56 yield an expected ~1.57 goals for Chicago; NYRB xG 1.77 and xG against Chicago 1.36 yield ~1.56 goals for the visitors; total expected goals = 3.13. Historical metrics confirm a goal-prone tendency: Over 1.5 occurred in 80% of Chicago’s matches and 100% of NYRB’s matches, and Over 2.5 in 60% of Chicago’s matches and 67% of NYRB’s matches (Chicago last 5 matches: Over 2.5 = 100%). Additional offensive signals are NYRB’s 6.17 shots on target vs Chicago’s 3.8 and Chicago’s higher conversion rate 14% vs NYRB 8%, which increases the probability of chance conversion and goal exchange. On this basis I assign a 90% probability to Over 1.5 (Over 2.5 66%, Over 3.5 44%) and recommend betting the over at 1.5 as the strongest and most reliable signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Chicago Fire hold the form edge and home advantage: they average 1.4 points per match this season versus 0.83 for New York RB, and in the last 5 matches Chicago have won 40% of games while NYRB have won none (0%). In terms of Half-Time, over the last 5 fixtures Chicago were leading at the break in 40% of matches and averaged 1.2 goals by Half-Time, whereas NYRB were trailing at the break in 60% of cases and averaged 0.6 goals by Half-Time. The second half further favors the hosts — in the last 5 matches Chicago have scored on average 1.4 goals after the break and there was a goal after Half-Time in 100% of those games, which increases the likelihood of a decisive goal in the second half. Although the visitors’ xG is 1.77 versus 1.57 for the hosts, NYRB have a lower finishing efficiency (8% vs Chicago’s 14%) and conceded on average 1.4 goals by Half-Time in their last 5 matches, reducing the visitors’ realistic chances of resistance in the second half. As a result, the strongest signal is Half-Time/Full-Time: draw at the break and Chicago to win after 90 minutes (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
Chicago FireNew York RB
15Shots9
Chicago FireNew York RB
4Shots on target4
Chicago FireNew York RB
1.6xG1.1
Chicago FireNew York RB
6Corners3
Chicago FireNew York RB
51Dangerous attacks35
Chicago FireNew York RB
7Fouls10
Chicago FireNew York RB
1Cards3
Chicago FireNew York RB

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chicago FireNew York RB
1.9Goals scored / match1.45
Chicago FireNew York RB
1.1Goals conceded / match2.45
Chicago FireNew York RB
53%Average possession58%
Chicago FireNew York RB
5.1Shots on target / match5.09
Chicago FireNew York RB

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.3Shots per match14.27
Chicago FireNew York RB
5.1Shots on target5.09
Chicago FireNew York RB
12.4%Shot conversion10.2%
Chicago FireNew York RB
53%Possession58%
Chicago FireNew York RB
1.68xG for1.68
Chicago FireNew York RB
1.36xG against1.47
Chicago FireNew York RB

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire: AttackingNew York RB: Dominant
Chicago FireNew York RB
Accuracy (shots on target)33%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire is 400% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Chicago Fire · 0.4 pts / match - New York RB

Chicago Fire
WWDWL
Season result split
50% W20% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-3
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.97Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
New York RB
DLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
27% W27% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-5
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

1.9 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 1.45 goals / match - New York RB

Chicago Fire is 123% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.1 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 2.45 goals / match - New York RB

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while New York RB keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).

New York RB scoring profile: mixed

New York RB scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 50% (5 of 10 matches).

19Goals scored (season)16
Chicago FireNew York RB
11Goals conceded (season)27
Chicago FireNew York RB
3Average goals in match3.91
Chicago FireNew York RB
12Goals scored (last 5)7
Chicago FireNew York RB
6Goals conceded (last 5)14
Chicago FireNew York RB

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal73%
Chicago FireNew York RB
50%2 goals36%
Chicago FireNew York RB
30%3 goals18%
Chicago FireNew York RB
10%4 goals18%
Chicago FireNew York RB

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal91%
Chicago FireNew York RB
40%2 goals73%
Chicago FireNew York RB
20%3 goals36%
Chicago FireNew York RB
0%4 goals27%
Chicago FireNew York RB

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time27%
Chicago FireNew York RB
10%BTTS in both halves27%
Chicago FireNew York RB
30%Scored in both halves27%
Chicago FireNew York RB

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
Chicago FireNew York RB
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Chicago FireNew York RB
40%BTTS - last 560%
Chicago FireNew York RB

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
Chicago FireNew York RB
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time64%
Chicago FireNew York RB
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Chicago FireNew York RB

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
Chicago FireNew York RB
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
Chicago FireNew York RB
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time36%
Chicago FireNew York RB

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 120% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Chicago Fire · 0.91 pts / match - New York RB

Chicago Fire - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
New York RB - half-time state
18% leading36% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)0.91
Chicago FireNew York RB
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.55
Chicago FireNew York RB
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)1
Chicago FireNew York RB
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.55
Chicago FireNew York RB
70%Clean sheet before half-time27%
Chicago FireNew York RB
30%No goal before half-time64%
Chicago FireNew York RB

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1
Chicago FireNew York RB
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.91
Chicago FireNew York RB
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)1.45
Chicago FireNew York RB
1.7Average goals (2nd half)2.36
Chicago FireNew York RB
60%Clean sheet after half-time27%
Chicago FireNew York RB
50%No goal after half-time36%
Chicago FireNew York RB

Chicago Fire - second-half results

30% W30% R40% P
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

New York RB - second-half results

27% W18% R55% P
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
New York RB - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match1.21.6
Average goals in match1.82.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
4
1
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

New York RB
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
7
31-45
4
7
46-60
2
3
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

New York RB

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.98
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Chicago FireLigaNew York RB
Average goals in match 3.003.20 3.91
Both teams scored 50%58% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 70%61% 64%
Clean sheets 50%24% 9%
Goal before half-time 70%73% 82%
Goal after half-time 70%78% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.20
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.92
Home goals / match
1.28
Away goals / match
+50%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. New York RBYellow cardRobert Voloder
  2. New York RBGoalJorge RuvalcabaAssist: Emil Forsberg
  3. New York RBSubstitutionOn: Jean-Eric Maxim Choupo-MotingOff: Julian Hall
  4. New York RBGoalCade CowellAssist: Ronald Donkor
  5. New York RBSubstitutionOn: Gustav BerggrenOff: Emil Forsberg
  6. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Puso DithejaneOff: Jonathan Bamba
  7. New York RBSubstitutionOn: Justin CheOff: Robert Voloder
  8. New York RBYellow cardJorge Ruvalcaba
  9. Chicago FireYellow cardMaren Haile-Selassie
  10. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Dylan BorsoOff: Maren Haile-Selassie
  11. Chicago FireGoalHugo Jean-Marc Cuypers
  12. New York RBYellow cardOmar Javier Valencia Arauz

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Allen ChapmanMatches officiated: 11
3.55Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 245%Home wins18%Draws36%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Chicago Fire vs New York RB?

The MLS match finished Chicago Fire 1:3 New York RB. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire vs New York RB?

Chicago Fire score 1.90 goals per game on average and New York RB 1.45. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Chicago Fire's matches and 64% of New York RB's.

What form are Chicago Fire and New York RB in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and New York RB 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire vs New York RB?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.