United States - MLSSoldier FieldData current as of 23 July 2026

Chicago Fire vs Toronto: match statistics

Chicago Fire crest
Chicago Fire
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Toronto crest
Toronto

Chicago Fire vs Toronto: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chicago Fire play Toronto in MLS (United States). The match date is 24 May 2026 at 02:30. Venue: Soldier Field. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Chicago Fire: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Toronto: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chicago Fire scores 1.93 and concedes 1.27 goals per match. Toronto scores 1.38 and concedes 1.81. League average: 3.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chicago Fire 60%, Toronto 75%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire 73%, Toronto 63%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Chicago Fire has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.34. Chicago Fire: 14.9 shots per match, Toronto: 11.7.

Match halves

Chicago Fire: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.13. Toronto: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 1.06.

Goals by minute

Chicago Fire: 61-75 (7 goals). Toronto: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.31 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Chicago Fire are favorites at home: hosts average 2.00 goals per home match, have average xG 1.92 and record 17.86 shots per game, of which 5.57 are on target, while Toronto away manage only 1.00 goal, xG 1.21 and 10.25 shots. Defensively the hosts also look superior — Chicago concede 1.14 goals per home match and have 57% of matches with a clean sheet, whereas Toronto concede 2.25 goals away and keep a clean sheet in only 25% of games. In current form the gap is clear: in the last 5 matches Chicago scored 9 goals and average 1.2 points per game, while Toronto scored 6 goals and average just 0.2 points per game over the same period — the visitors are without a win in their last 5 (0 wins, 1 draw, 4 losses). Additionally the hosts have 0% of home matches without scoring this season (always score), and shot conversion is 11% versus the guests’ 10%; these figures, together with the xG advantage and higher number of shots on target, point to a Chicago victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Chicago FireToronto
15Shots11
Chicago FireToronto
6Shots on target4
Chicago FireToronto
1.68xG1.19
Chicago FireToronto
3Corners4
Chicago FireToronto
44Dangerous attacks29
Chicago FireToronto
12Fouls12
Chicago FireToronto
4Cards4
Chicago FireToronto

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.93Goals scored / match1.38
Chicago FireToronto
1.27Goals conceded / match1.81
Chicago FireToronto
53%Average possession47%
Chicago FireToronto
5.13Shots on target / match4.13
Chicago FireToronto

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.87Shots per match11.69
Chicago FireToronto
5.13Shots on target4.13
Chicago FireToronto
13%Shot conversion11.8%
Chicago FireToronto
53%Possession47%
Chicago FireToronto
1.64xG for1.34
Chicago FireToronto
1.41xG against1.37
Chicago FireToronto

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire: AttackingToronto: Balanced
Chicago FireToronto
Accuracy (shots on target)34%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire is 350% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire · 0.4 pts / match - Toronto

Chicago Fire
LWWWL
Season result split
53% W13% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-5
1.73 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Toronto
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
19% W44% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

1.93 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 1.38 goals / match - Toronto

Chicago Fire is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.27 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 1.81 goals / match - Toronto

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 93% of matches (14 of 15 matches), while Toronto keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

Toronto scoring profile: strong

Toronto scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

29Goals scored (season)22
Chicago FireToronto
19Goals conceded (season)29
Chicago FireToronto
3.2Average goals in match3.19
Chicago FireToronto
10Goals scored (last 5)4
Chicago FireToronto
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
Chicago FireToronto

How often they score at least...

93%1 goal81%
Chicago FireToronto
60%2 goals38%
Chicago FireToronto
27%3 goals19%
Chicago FireToronto
7%4 goals0%
Chicago FireToronto

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal81%
Chicago FireToronto
40%2 goals56%
Chicago FireToronto
27%3 goals38%
Chicago FireToronto
0%4 goals6%
Chicago FireToronto

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time25%
Chicago FireToronto
13%BTTS in both halves6%
Chicago FireToronto
40%Scored in both halves6%
Chicago FireToronto

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
Chicago FireToronto
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Chicago FireToronto
80%BTTS - last 560%
Chicago FireToronto

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Chicago FireToronto
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Chicago FireToronto
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Chicago FireToronto

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Chicago FireToronto
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Chicago FireToronto
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Chicago FireToronto

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 142% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Chicago Fire · 0.69 pts / match - Toronto

Chicago Fire - half-time state
40% leading47% draw13% trailing
Toronto - half-time state
6% leading50% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)0.69
Chicago FireToronto
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.31
Chicago FireToronto
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.81
Chicago FireToronto
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.13
Chicago FireToronto
53%Clean sheet before half-time44%
Chicago FireToronto
33%No goal before half-time69%
Chicago FireToronto

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.31
Chicago FireToronto
1.13Goals scored (2nd half)1.06
Chicago FireToronto
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Chicago FireToronto
1.87Average goals (2nd half)2.06
Chicago FireToronto
60%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Chicago FireToronto
33%No goal after half-time44%
Chicago FireToronto

Chicago Fire - second-half results

40% W20% R40% P
25
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Toronto - second-half results

31% W38% R31% P
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding317%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Toronto - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
6
2
16-30
3
6
31-45
3
2
46-60
7
1
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Toronto
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
5
61-75
9
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Toronto

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Chicago FireLigaToronto
Average goals in match 3.203.31 3.19
Both teams scored 60%61% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%63% 63%
Clean sheets 40%22% 19%
Goal before half-time 80%77% 63%
Goal after half-time 80%80% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.31
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.92
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Chicago Fire vs Toronto?

The MLS match finished Chicago Fire 2:1 Toronto. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire vs Toronto?

Chicago Fire score 1.93 goals per game on average and Toronto 1.38. The MLS average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Chicago Fire's matches and 75% of Toronto's.

What form are Chicago Fire and Toronto in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Toronto 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire vs Toronto?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chicago Fire vs Toronto: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.