United States - MLSSoldier FieldData current as of 06 September 2026

Chicago Fire vs Toronto: match statistics

Chicago Fire crest
Chicago Fire
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Toronto crest
Toronto

Chicago Fire vs Toronto: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chicago Fire played Toronto in MLS (United States). The match was played on 24 May 2026. Venue: Soldier Field. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Chicago Fire: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Toronto: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chicago Fire scores 1.92 and concedes 1.15 goals per match. Toronto scores 1.62 and concedes 2.08. League average: 3.28 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chicago Fire 54%, Toronto 85%. Over 2.5: Chicago Fire 69%, Toronto 69%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Chicago Fire has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.40. Chicago Fire: 14.8 shots per match, Toronto: 11.9.

Match halves

Chicago Fire: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.15. Toronto: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 1.31.

Goals by minute

Chicago Fire: 76-90+ (7 goals). Toronto: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.28 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chicago Fire are favorites at home: hosts average 2.00 goals per home match, have average xG 1.92 and record 17.86 shots per game, of which 5.57 are on target, while Toronto away manage only 1.00 goal, xG 1.21 and 10.25 shots. Defensively the hosts also look superior — Chicago concede 1.14 goals per home match and have 57% of matches with a clean sheet, whereas Toronto concede 2.25 goals away and keep a clean sheet in only 25% of games. In current form the gap is clear: in the last 5 matches Chicago scored 9 goals and average 1.2 points per game, while Toronto scored 6 goals and average just 0.2 points per game over the same period — the visitors are without a win in their last 5 (0 wins, 1 draw, 4 losses). Additionally the hosts have 0% of home matches without scoring this season (always score), and shot conversion is 11% versus the guests’ 10%; these figures, together with the xG advantage and higher number of shots on target, point to a Chicago victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS signal is strong: Chicago has 100% BTTS this season and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Toronto has 50% BTTS this season and 100% in the last 5. Both teams concede frequently — Chicago averages 2.0 goals conceded per game this season (1.8 in the last 5), Toronto 2.25 this season (2.6 in the last 5) — which significantly increases the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Chicago scores 1.89 goals per game this season with xG 1.48 and 5.0 shots on target, Toronto has 1.0 goals with xG 1.21 and 4.0 shots on target; additionally the league averages 3.26 goals per game, and Over2.5 is 67% for Chicago and 75% for Toronto, which supports a goal-heavy scenario. Chicago has not kept a single clean sheet this season (0% CS) versus Toronto’s 25%, so the BTTS - Yes outcome is clearly more likely than a No Goal/clean sheet from one side.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project a total of 2.71 goals (Chicago 1.47 vs Toronto 1.24), calculated as the average of home attack xG 1.48 and away defense xG 1.46, and away attack xG 1.21 and home defense xG 1.27. This provides a clear cushion above the 1.5 line: Chicago score 1.89 goals at home on average and have 100% of matches >1.5, while Toronto have 75% of matches >1.5, so Over 1.5 goals is highly probable. The 2.5 line is also supported by statistics — seasonally Over 2.5 occurred in 67% of Chicago’s matches and 75% of Toronto’s, and in the last 5 fixtures both teams recorded Over 2.5 in 80% — however the projected xG of 2.71 only marginally exceeds 2.5. Over 3.5 looks less certain: season-long Over 3.5 is 44% for Chicago and 50% for Toronto, and the projected 2.71 xG remains below 3.5, therefore Under 3.5 has the edge. Considering higher average shots (Chicago 12.67 vs Toronto 10.25), shots on target (5.0 vs 4.0) and a high BTTS rate for the home side (100%), I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the strongest and most data-driven signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time I expect a draw: Chicago averages only 0.22 goals by the break, Toronto 0.5, and the home side has 44% of matches level at half-time. After the break the advantage shifts to the hosts — Chicago averages 1.67 goals after half-time versus 0.5 for Toronto, and the combined average xG is 1.48 for Chicago vs 1.21 for Toronto. Additionally, Chicago records an average of 5.0 shots on target compared to 4.0 for Toronto and has a higher shot conversion rate (15% vs 10%), which increases the likelihood of goals in the second half. Toronto are in poor away form (0% wins in their last five away matches and an average of 0.2 points per game in that period), so it is more likely the hosts will win the match after a draw at half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Chicago FireToronto
15Shots11
Chicago FireToronto
6Shots on target4
Chicago FireToronto
1.68xG1.19
Chicago FireToronto
3Corners4
Chicago FireToronto
44Dangerous attacks29
Chicago FireToronto
12Fouls12
Chicago FireToronto
4Cards4
Chicago FireToronto

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chicago FireToronto
1.92Goals scored / match1.62
Chicago FireToronto
1.15Goals conceded / match2.08
Chicago FireToronto
53%Average possession48%
Chicago FireToronto
5.15Shots on target / match4.69
Chicago FireToronto

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.85Shots per match11.92
Chicago FireToronto
5.15Shots on target4.69
Chicago FireToronto
13%Shot conversion13.5%
Chicago FireToronto
53%Possession48%
Chicago FireToronto
1.64xG for1.4
Chicago FireToronto
1.39xG against1.33
Chicago FireToronto

Shooting quality

Chicago Fire: AttackingToronto: Efficient finishing
Chicago FireToronto
Accuracy (shots on target)35%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire is 350% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire · 0.4 pts / match - Toronto

Chicago Fire
WLLWW
Season result split
54% W15% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-4
1.77 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Toronto
DLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W38% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-5-5
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 away
1-0-3
LLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.92 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 1.62 goals / match - Toronto

Chicago Fire is 81% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.15 goals / match - Chicago Fire · 2.08 goals / match - Toronto

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Toronto keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).

Toronto scoring profile: very strong

Toronto scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 matches).

25Goals scored (season)21
Chicago FireToronto
15Goals conceded (season)27
Chicago FireToronto
3.08Average goals in match3.69
Chicago FireToronto
13Goals scored (last 5)8
Chicago FireToronto
7Goals conceded (last 5)13
Chicago FireToronto

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal92%
Chicago FireToronto
54%2 goals46%
Chicago FireToronto
31%3 goals23%
Chicago FireToronto
8%4 goals0%
Chicago FireToronto

How often they concede at least...

54%1 goal92%
Chicago FireToronto
38%2 goals62%
Chicago FireToronto
23%3 goals46%
Chicago FireToronto
0%4 goals8%
Chicago FireToronto

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time23%
Chicago FireToronto
8%BTTS in both halves8%
Chicago FireToronto
31%Scored in both halves8%
Chicago FireToronto

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS62%
Chicago FireToronto
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Chicago FireToronto
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Chicago FireToronto

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Chicago FireToronto
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Chicago FireToronto
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
Chicago FireToronto

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Chicago FireToronto
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
Chicago FireToronto
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
Chicago FireToronto

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 185% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.77 pts / match - Chicago Fire · 0.62 pts / match - Toronto

Chicago Fire - half-time state
46% leading38% draw15% trailing
Toronto - half-time state
8% leading38% draw54% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.77Points per match (1st half)0.62
Chicago FireToronto
0.77Goals scored (1st half)0.31
Chicago FireToronto
0.46Goals conceded (1st half)0.92
Chicago FireToronto
1.23Average goals (1st half)1.23
Chicago FireToronto
62%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Chicago FireToronto
38%No goal before half-time69%
Chicago FireToronto

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.46
Chicago FireToronto
1.15Goals scored (2nd half)1.31
Chicago FireToronto
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)1.15
Chicago FireToronto
1.85Average goals (2nd half)2.46
Chicago FireToronto
62%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Chicago FireToronto
38%No goal after half-time31%
Chicago FireToronto

Chicago Fire - second-half results

38% W23% R38% P
23
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Toronto - second-half results

38% W31% R31% P
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding288%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.62.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.42.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+7
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Toronto - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.80
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.6
Average goals in match1.42.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
4
1
16-30
3
5
31-45
3
1
46-60
5
1
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Toronto
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
9
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
85%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Toronto

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.75
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Chicago FireLigaToronto
Average goals in match 3.083.28 3.69
Both teams scored 54%61% 85%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%62% 69%
Clean sheets 46%22% 8%
Goal before half-time 77%77% 69%
Goal after half-time 77%81% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.28
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.94
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+44%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TorontoYellow cardMalik Henry
  2. Chicago FireGoalRobin LodAssist: Maren Haile-Selassie
  3. Chicago FireYellow cardHugo Jean-Marc Cuypers
  4. TorontoSubstitutionOn: Zane MonlouisOff: Nickseon Gomis
  5. Chicago FireYellow cardAndrew Gutman
  6. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Dje Tah D'AvillaOff: Mauricio Pineda
  7. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Joel WatermanOff: Mbekezeli Mbokazi
  8. TorontoSubstitutionOn: Theo CorbeanuOff: Derrick Burckley Etienne Jr.
  9. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Puso DithejaneOff: Maren Haile-Selassie
  10. TorontoYellow cardWalker Dwain Zimmerman
  11. TorontoSubstitutionOn: Jules-Anthony VilsaintOff: Malik Henry
  12. Chicago FireYellow cardAnton Jönsson Salétros
  13. TorontoYellow cardJonathan Osorio
  14. TorontoYellow cardTheo Corbeanu
  15. Chicago FireYellow cardChristopher Brady

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Chicago Fire vs Toronto?

The MLS match finished Chicago Fire 2:1 Toronto. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chicago Fire vs Toronto?

Chicago Fire score 1.92 goals per game on average and Toronto 1.62. The MLS average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Chicago Fire's matches and 85% of Toronto's.

What form are Chicago Fire and Toronto in?

Over the last 5 games Chicago Fire have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Toronto 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chicago Fire vs Toronto?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chicago Fire vs Toronto: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.