England - Southern League Premier SouthOaklands Park StadiumData current as of 18 October 2026

Chichester City vs Havant & Waterlooville: match statistics

Chichester City vs Havant & Waterlooville: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chichester City played Havant & Waterlooville in Southern League Premier South (England). The match was played on 31 August 2026. Venue: Oaklands Park Stadium. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Chichester City: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Havant & Waterlooville: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chichester City scores 1.60 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Havant & Waterlooville scores 1.00 and concedes 1.80. League average: 3.11 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chichester City 20%, Havant & Waterlooville 40%. Over 2.5: Chichester City 60%, Havant & Waterlooville 40%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Havant & Waterlooville has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.51. Chichester City: 5.6 shots per match, Havant & Waterlooville: 4.6.

Match halves

Chichester City: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.40. Havant & Waterlooville: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Chichester City: 31-45+ (3 goals). Havant & Waterlooville: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Southern League Premier South: 3.11 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chichester City have a clearly superior record over their last five matches: they have collected 7 points from 2 wins and a draw, while Havant & Waterlooville have managed just 3 points and suffered 4 defeats. The hosts average 2.5 goals per home game and have not been held scoreless, whereas the visitors score just 0.5 goals per away match and failed to score in 50% of their outings. Havant & Waterlooville have lost both of their away matches to date, conceding an average of 2 goals per game and keeping no clean sheets. Chichester also enjoy greater possession, 55% compared with 41%, while the visitors’ defence allows opponents chances worth an average of 1.70 xG, which favours the hosts. Although Chichester’s home xG stands at just 0.98, home advantage and the visitors’ poor finishing make a home win the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as Chichester City kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches, while Havant & Waterlooville failed to score in 50% of games. The visitors average just 0.5 goals per match, with their average standing at only 0.6 goals across their last five appearances, despite allowing opponents plenty of chances. BTTS occurred in 0% of the hosts’ matches this season, while the figure for both teams across their last five games stands at 40%, below the league average of 50%. Chichester do create plenty of chances, averaging 18 shots with an xG of 1.92, while Havant’s defence concedes an average of 2.0 goals, making a home goal and at least one team failing to score the most likely scenario. The visitors’ high 1.60 xG across their last five matches limits confidence in the pick, but their poor finishing still tilts the forecast towards BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Chichester City’s latest form points to 1.6 goals scored per match across their last five games, while Havant & Waterlooville have conceded as many as 1.8 goals over the same period. The hosts consistently create chances, averaging 18 shots and recording a season xG of 1.92, while the visitors’ defence allows an average xG of 1.70. Havant & Waterlooville also have an xG of 1.60 across their last five matches, so they should contribute to a total of at least two goals. The Over 1.5 goals line has an edge, as all of the visitors’ matches to date and 50% of the hosts’ games have gone above this threshold, while the projected total of 2.75 goals is clearly higher. Caution is advised with higher lines, as neither team has yet been involved in a match featuring more than 3 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Chichester City possess the stronger attacking potential: their average xG stands at 1.92 compared with Havant & Waterlooville’s 1.27, while over the last five matches the hosts have averaged 1.6 goals scored against 0.6 for the visitors. Havant have lost 80% of their last five fixtures and conceded an average of 1.8 goals in those games, whereas Chichester have won 40% of their matches and recorded 1.4 points per game. The visitors were trailing at half-time in 60% of their last five appearances, with an average first-half record of just 0.4 goals scored and 1.2 conceded. The hosts are also not particularly strong from the outset, having gone into the break behind in 60% of their recent matches, which makes the HT/FT draw/Chichester scenario—level at half-time before a Chichester win after the break—significant. Nevertheless, the strongest individual scenario remains Chichester leading at the break and winning at full-time (1/1), supported by Havant’s weak defence, which is conceding an average of 2.0 goals per match in the current campaign.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
-1Shots-1
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
-1Shots on target-1
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
0xG0
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
-1Corners-1
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
0Dangerous attacks0
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
-1Fouls-1
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
-1Cards-1
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
1.6Goals scored / match1
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
1Goals conceded / match1.8
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
20%Average possession20%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
1Shots on target / match1.6
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.6Shots per match4.6
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
1Shots on target1.6
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
28.6%Shot conversion21.7%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
20%Possession20%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
1.51xG for1.6
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
1.11xG against1.54
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville

Shooting quality

Chichester City: Counter-attackingHavant & Waterlooville: Counter-attacking
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
Accuracy (shots on target)18%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.270.35
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.600.63

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chichester City is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Chichester City · 0.8 pts / match - Havant & Waterlooville

Chichester City
LWLWW
Season result split
60% W0% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Havant & Waterlooville
LLWLD
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chichester City is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - Chichester City · 1 goals / match - Havant & Waterlooville

Chichester City is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Chichester City · 1.8 goals / match - Havant & Waterlooville

Chichester City scoring profile: very strong

Chichester City scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Havant & Waterlooville keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Havant & Waterlooville scoring profile: mixed

Havant & Waterlooville scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Chichester City keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).

8Goals scored (season)5
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
5Goals conceded (season)9
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
2.6Average goals in match2.8
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
8Goals scored (last 5)5
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal60%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
40%2 goals20%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
20%3 goals20%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
20%4 goals0%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal80%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
40%2 goals80%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
20%3 goals20%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
0%4 goals0%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
Havant & Waterlooville - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.2 of 5 matches
56%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time40%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
0%BTTS in both halves20%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
20%Scored in both halves20%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
40%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
20%BTTS - last 540%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
80%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chichester City is 350% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.8 pts / match - Chichester City · 0.4 pts / match - Havant & Waterlooville

Chichester City - half-time state
60% leading0% draw40% trailing
Havant & Waterlooville - half-time state
0% leading40% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.8Points per match (1st half)0.4
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
1.2Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)1.2
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
2Average goals (1st half)1.6
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
60%Clean sheet before half-time20%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
40%No goal before half-time60%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)1.2
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
0.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
0.6Average goals (2nd half)1.2
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
80%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville
60%No goal after half-time60%
Chichester CityHavant & Waterlooville

Chichester City - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
9
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Havant & Waterlooville - second-half results

20% W60% D20% L
2
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.40
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chichester City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match2.00.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals80%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6
Havant & Waterlooville - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chichester City
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Havant & Waterlooville
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
4
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
30%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chichester City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.8
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Havant & Waterlooville

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Southern League Premier South).

Teams vs league

Chichester CityLigaHavant & Waterlooville
Average goals in match▼ 2.603.11▼ 2.80
Both teams scored▼ 20%56%▼ 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 60%56%▼ 40%
Clean sheets▲ 60%25%▼ 20%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%76%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▼ 60%80%▼ 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.11
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.73
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
15%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

—Alfy Whittingham⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Havant & WaterloovilleGoalAlfy Whittingham

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Chichester City vs Havant & Waterlooville?

The Southern League Premier South match finished Chichester City 3:2 Havant & Waterlooville. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chichester City vs Havant & Waterlooville?

Chichester City score 1.60 goals per game on average and Havant & Waterlooville 1.00. The Southern League Premier South average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Chichester City's matches and 40% of Havant & Waterlooville's.

What form are Chichester City and Havant & Waterlooville in?

Over the last 5 games Chichester City have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Havant & Waterlooville 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chichester City vs Havant & Waterlooville?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.