Romania - Liga IIStadionul Ilie OanăData current as of 18 October 2026

Chindia Târgovişte vs Concordia Chiajna: match statistics

Chindia Târgovişte vs Concordia Chiajna: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chindia Târgovişte played Concordia Chiajna in Liga II (Romania). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: Stadionul Ilie Oană. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Chindia Târgovişte: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Concordia Chiajna: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chindia Târgovişte scores 2.13 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Concordia Chiajna scores 2.13 and concedes 1.63. League average: 2.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chindia Târgovişte 50%, Concordia Chiajna 75%. Over 2.5: Chindia Târgovişte 75%, Concordia Chiajna 75%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Chindia Târgovişte has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.44. Chindia Târgovişte: 12.5 shots per match, Concordia Chiajna: 11.1.

Match halves

Chindia Târgovişte: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.38. Concordia Chiajna: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.25.

Goals by minute

Chindia Târgovişte: 76-90+ (5 goals). Concordia Chiajna: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga II: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chindia Târgovişte hold a slight edge thanks to the quality of the chances they create at home: their average xG is 2.52, compared with Concordia Chiajna’s 1.68 away from home. The hosts also average 11 shots on target per home match, versus 6 for the visitors on the road, while conceding 1.00 and 1.25 goals per game, respectively. Concordia remain a threat, however: they have won all 4 of their away matches, scoring an average of 3.25 goals and converting 24% of their shots, compared with Chindia’s 2.67 goals and 13% conversion rate at home. Both teams have won 3 of their last 5 matches, but the hosts conceded 5 goals over that spell, while the visitors let in 8. Chindia’s higher chance creation and slightly more reliable defence give them the edge, although Concordia’s away run makes the hosts only narrow favourites.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for BTTS - Yes is supported by the fact that Concordia scored in every away match included in the sample, while Chindia conceded an average of 2.0 goals at home. The visitors averaged 3.25 goals away from home, although their xG was 1.68, so such a high level of finishing should not be treated as a certainty. The hosts’ chances of scoring are boosted by Concordia’s failure to keep a clean sheet away from home and by the average of 1.6 goals they have conceded across their last 5 matches. BTTS occurred in 100% of Concordia’s away matches and 50% of Chindia’s home matches, while in the teams’ last 5 appearances the figures were 80% and 40%, respectively. Chindia’s less consistent scoring record limits confidence in the prediction, but the visitors’ attacking output and vulnerability to conceding give the edge to the scenario in which both teams score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been cleared in 75% of Chindia’s matches and 100% of Concordia’s. The away side scores an average of 3.25 goals per match, while the hosts concede 2.0; meanwhile, the teams’ average xG figures are 1.68 and 1.19, respectively, pointing to scoring chances at both ends. Chindia’s last five matches averaged 3.0 goals, compared with 4.4 in Concordia’s matches, so recent form also supports a bet on at least two goals. The Over 2.5 line also looks promising, but it has landed in 50% of the hosts’ matches versus 100% of the away side’s, making Over 1.5 the clearer signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is Concordia leading at the break: the visitors led in 3 of their 4 away matches, while Chindia neither led nor scored in the first half in any of their 4 home games. Concordia averaged 1.75 first-half goals away from home, while Chindia conceded an average of 1.0 goal in that period at home. The visitors’ 4 wins from 4 away matches and their higher attacking xG (1.68 compared with the hosts’ 1.19) support them maintaining their lead. However, Chindia could respond after the break, having averaged 1.6 goals in the second half across its last 5 matches, so scenarios in which Concordia relinquishes its lead remain plausible. Despite this risk, the combination of frequent away leads at half-time and a perfect away record makes 2/2 the most likely HT/FT pick.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
18Shots8
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
11Shots on target4
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
2.29xG1.08
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
7Corners7
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
55Dangerous attacks41
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
11Fouls9
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
0Cards0
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
2.13Goals scored / match2.13
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
1Goals conceded / match1.63
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
48%Average possession50%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
6.5Shots on target / match4.88
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match11.13
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
6.5Shots on target4.88
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
17%Shot conversion19.1%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
48%Possession50%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
1.76xG for1.44
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
1.74xG against1.54
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna

Shooting quality

Chindia Târgovişte: Efficient finishingConcordia Chiajna: Efficient finishing
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
Accuracy (shots on target)52%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chindia Târgovişte is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Chindia Târgovişte · 1.2 pts / match - Concordia Chiajna

Chindia Târgovişte
LWLWW
Season result split
63% W0% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-0-3
1.88 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Concordia Chiajna
LWLWL
Season result split
63% W0% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-0-3
1.88 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-0-0
Last 5 away
4-0-0
WWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chindia Târgovişte is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Chindia Târgovişte · 1.63 goals / match - Concordia Chiajna

Chindia Târgovişte scoring profile: very strong

Chindia Târgovişte scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Concordia Chiajna keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).

Concordia Chiajna scoring profile: very strong

Concordia Chiajna scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Chindia Târgovişte keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 matches).

17Goals scored (season)17
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
8Goals conceded (season)13
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
3.13Average goals in match3.75
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
11Goals scored (last 5)10
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
6Goals conceded (last 5)11
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal88%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
63%2 goals63%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
50%3 goals38%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
13%4 goals13%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal88%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
25%2 goals38%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
13%3 goals13%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
0%4 goals13%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Chindia Târgovişte - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.4 of 8 matches
60%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time25%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
50%Scored in both halves50%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
60%BTTS - last 580%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chindia Târgovişte is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.75 pts / match - Chindia Târgovişte · 1.5 pts / match - Concordia Chiajna

Chindia Târgovişte - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing
Concordia Chiajna - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.75Points per match (1st half)1.5
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.88
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.75
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
63%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
38%No goal before half-time50%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna

After half-time (2nd half)

2.13Points per match (2nd half)1.75
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
1.38Goals scored (2nd half)1.25
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
2Average goals (2nd half)2
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
63%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna
25%No goal after half-time13%
Chindia TârgovişteConcordia Chiajna

Chindia Târgovişte - second-half results

63% W25% D13% L
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Concordia Chiajna - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
12
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding166%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chindia Târgovişte - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.61.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.02.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Concordia Chiajna - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match2.02.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chindia Târgovişte
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
2
3
16-30
1
0
31-45
3
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Concordia Chiajna
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
3
3
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
2
46-60
4
1
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.44
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-71%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
77%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chindia Târgovişte

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.74
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Concordia Chiajna

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.69
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
164%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).

Teams vs league

Chindia TârgovişteLigaConcordia Chiajna
Average goals in match▲ 3.132.99▲ 3.75
Both teams scored▼ 50%60%▲ 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 75%57%▲ 75%
Clean sheets▲ 38%22%▼ 13%
Goal before half-time▲ 88%79%▼ 75%
Goal after half-time▲ 88%85%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.69
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Away team

Other recorded players

—Ían Pino Soler⚽ 1
—Santiago Samanes Bonito⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chindia TârgovişteGoalGeorgian Honciu
  2. Chindia TârgovişteGoalMihail Alexandru Băluță
  3. Concordia ChiajnaGoalSantiago Samanes Bonito
  4. Concordia ChiajnaGoalÍan Pino Soler

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Chindia Târgovişte 1 - 0 - 0 Concordia Chiajna. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Chindia Târgovişte vs Concordia Chiajna?

The Liga II match finished Chindia Târgovişte 3:2 Concordia Chiajna. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chindia Târgovişte vs Concordia Chiajna?

Chindia Târgovişte score 2.13 goals per game on average and Concordia Chiajna 2.13. The Liga II average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Chindia Târgovişte's matches and 75% of Concordia Chiajna's.

What form are Chindia Târgovişte and Concordia Chiajna in?

Over the last 5 games Chindia Târgovişte have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Concordia Chiajna 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chindia Târgovişte vs Concordia Chiajna?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.