Chonburi vs Muang Thong United: match statistics
Chonburi vs Muang Thong United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chonburi played Muang Thong United in Thai League T1 (Thailand). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Chonburi: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Muang Thong United: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chonburi scores 1.26 and concedes 1.41 goals per match. Muang Thong United scores 0.96 and concedes 1.78. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chonburi 56%, Muang Thong United 52%. Over 2.5: Chonburi 44%, Muang Thong United 56%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Muang Thong United has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.34. Chonburi: 12.7 shots per match, Muang Thong United: 13.7.
Match halves
Chonburi: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.81. Muang Thong United: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.70.
Goals by minute
Chonburi: 46-60 (8 goals). Muang Thong United: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Thai League T1: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chonburi holds a clear statistical edge at home: the hosts average 1.46 goals scored and concede 1.08 per home match, while Muang Thong on the road score only 0.92 and concede 2.00. Additionally, Chonburi convert shots more efficiently (10% conversion at home vs. 7% for the visitors), and their home goal difference is +5 versus Muang Thong’s -14 away. Both teams attempt a similar number of shots (around 14 shots and 4.69 on target per match), but the visitors have a higher away xG (1.54) than actual goals (0.92), indicating finishing issues. Short-term form is comparable (3 wins in the last 5 and 1.8 points per match each), yet the “failed to score” rate is worse for the visitors at 38% versus 23% for the hosts, and Muang Thong’s away win percentage is only 8%. Given the superior home defence, higher conversion and favorable home goal balance, I back a Chonburi win, though a draw remains possible.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The Both Teams To Score (BTTS - Yes) scenario appears more likely because Muang Thong concedes an average of 2.00 goals per match this season and has only 8% clean sheets, while Chonburi concedes 1.57 and keeps a clean sheet in 36% of matches. Both teams generate similar scoring opportunities: xG 1.50 for Chonburi and 1.54 for Muang Thong, and shots on target 4.71 vs 4.69, which increases the likelihood that both sides will convert at least one chance. Season BTTS rates are 50% (Chonburi) and 54% (Muang Thong), with the league BTTS level at 56%, meaning historically more than half of matches in this league end Goal/Goal. Additionally, in the last 5 matches Muang Thong had BTTS in 80% of games (Chonburi 40%), and over that period average goals scored are 2.0 for Chonburi and 1.4 for Muang Thong with average goals conceded 1.4 and 1.2 respectively; therefore I assign 70% to 'yes' and 30% to 'no'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined expected goals for both teams are around 2.86 (xG Chonburi 1.51, xG Muang Thong 1.35), which is clearly above the 2.5 threshold and indicates a higher probability of three or more goals. Season Over 2.5 rates are 50% for Chonburi and 62% for Muang Thong (average 56%), and in the last 5 matches Over 2.5 occurred in 40% for the home side and 80% for the away side (average 60%), further supporting the Over 2.5 scenario. Both teams register a similar number of shots (13.43 vs 14.08) and shots on target (4.71 vs 4.69) with a conversion rate of 7%, and BTTS appears in 50% and 54% of matches, so goals from both sides are realistic. Chonburi have scored 34 and conceded 38 goals this season, while Muang Thong have 26 scored and 48 conceded and only 8% clean sheets – this further increases the likelihood of goals. For these reasons I select Over at the 2.5 line as the strongest signal: expected 2.86 goals and historical Over 2.5 metrics (~56% season, ~60% in last 5) give an edge to this selection.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Chonburi average 1.29 points per home match this season, while Muang Thong averages only 0.46 points away, which favors the home side for the Full-Time result. Season-to-date Muang Thong have scored 21 first-half goals versus 8 for Chonburi, but in the last 5 fixtures Chonburi led at the break in 40% (2/5) and the visitors only in 20% (1/5), so recent first-half form favors the hosts. The second half often decides these matches: the home team averages 2.0 goals in the second half versus 1.31 for the away side, and the proportion of matches with goals after the break is 79% for Chonburi and 92% for Muang Thong, meaning decisive strikes frequently come post-break. Both teams’ xG are nearly even (1.50 vs 1.54), but Chonburi concede fewer expected goals (xGA 1.17 vs 1.52 for Muang Thong) and have a higher clean sheet rate this season (36% vs 8%), hence the strongest signal is Half-Time/Full-Time: draw at the break and home win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chonburi | Muang Thong United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chonburi is 31% better for: goals scored per match.
1.26 goals / match - Chonburi · 0.96 goals / match - Muang Thong United
Chonburi is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.41 goals / match - Chonburi · 1.78 goals / match - Muang Thong United
Chonburi scores in 63% of matches (17 of 27 matches), while Muang Thong United keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).
Muang Thong United scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while Chonburi keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chonburi
Over / Under - Muang Thong United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chonburi is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - Chonburi · 0.74 pts / match - Muang Thong United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chonburi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Muang Thong United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chonburi
Muang Thong United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Thai League T1).
Teams vs league
| Chonburi | Liga | Muang Thong United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.67 | 2.67 | • 2.74 |
| Both teams scored | • 56% | 56% | ▼ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 46% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 26% | ▼ 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 69% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 82% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Chonburi 1 - 0 - 0 Muang Thong United. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Chonburi vs Muang Thong United?
The Thai League T1 match finished Chonburi 0:0 Muang Thong United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chonburi vs Muang Thong United?
Chonburi score 1.26 goals per game on average and Muang Thong United 0.96. The Thai League T1 average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Chonburi's matches and 52% of Muang Thong United's.
What form are Chonburi and Muang Thong United in?
Over the last 5 games Chonburi have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Muang Thong United 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chonburi vs Muang Thong United?
The statistical background for Chonburi vs Muang Thong United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


